Originally posted by SurturI cannot help you struggle to comprehend my reply and you let whatever thoughts you have out of your head without thinking them through. Good stuff.
I'm inferring you're not an intelligent person and you routinely use words and phrases wrong.Sorry if that was not made clear earlier 🙂
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Or what he is peddling to Incels.Plagiarized with amusement.
Women wear red lipstick because "the lips turn red during sexual arousal" and therefore women do it solely to sexually titillate men, and therefore any workplace where women wear red lipstick is inherently sexual and thus all bets are off and it's open season on sexual behavior (he claims he does not mean to imply this, yet he then goes on to say that he believes that women have some culpability for sexualizing in the workplace by this meager definition - still others insist that he never said that, in which case I might ask what the point of this observation even is? If nobody is responsible for it and he is not suggesting that any course of action is necessary that would incorporate this knowledge in any way, then why bring it up?)
In addition, men sexually harassing women in the workplace is actually women's fault because they wear makeup, which of course is only ever done for the express purpose of sexually titillating men (this is news to me as a male who doesn't find makeup attractive, and whose SO has only ever worn light makeup to an interview to appear clean and professional)
Also high heels are a secret ploy by women to attract men just so they can manipulate men ("silly cuck he doesn't use the word 'secret ploy,' he only said that women deliberately manipulate men using sex! That's totally different!)
When asked what we should do about these things, he suggests, "The Maoists gave everyone uniforms to keep this thing from happening," implying that the only "solutions" are to either (A) go full-blown Communist China, or (B) just allow literally everything and hold nobody accountable for their actions in the workplace. This is clever, but in an extremely sinister way - he's insinuating that communism and sexual harassment are two sides of the same coin. This is borderline newspeak levels of manipulative. Of course his defenders claim that he isn't doing this on purpose. But if you look at it in any other context then this comment seems out of place - he's extremely anti-communist so it's obvious that he's not advocating this course of action unironically, and if he is being ironic then the point is that he's satirizing the idea that people should try to control these behaviors as some kind of totalitarian collectivism. So what does he "actually mean," then?)
We as a society are "deteriorating rapidly" as a direct result of men and women working together because of this "provocation"
Sexual harassment in the workplace won't stop because "We don't know the rules" (literally just don't take any action which connotes a sense of entitlement to another person's personal space or body, it's literally that simple, I've been doing this for more than a decade and I've never once even been accused of sexual harassment and I've never felt inclined to do so)
I agree with this for the most part.
I do believe a double standard exists, where men are always perceived as "threat" compared to women, and this is provable by cases where the same judge presides over a minor having sexual relations with an adult, and gives vastly different penalties based on whether the adult is male or female.
But in the end if a guy isn't acting like a creep he has nothing to fear.
Originally posted by Scribble
Let's get cancelled together. We'll make our own discourse, with blackjack, and abhorrent hookers.
Deal.
I make good blueberry pancakes. And omelets. You bring the hookers and cards.
All the people caught and cancelled for jokes and moments of emotional outbursts are going to have to form a society of abhorrents.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Deal.I make good blueberry pancakes. And omelets. You bring the hookers and cards.
All the people caught and cancelled for jokes and moments of emotional outbursts are going to have to form a society of abhorrents.
this is just like the island of misfit toys, ill bring some weed
Originally posted by dadudemonThis sounds great! We'll be a veritable basket of deplorables.
Deal.I make good blueberry pancakes. And omelets. You bring the hookers and cards.
All the people caught and cancelled for jokes and moments of emotional outbursts are going to have to form a society of abhorrents.
Originally posted by SurturYou're hired. When can you start?
this is just like the island of misfit toys, ill bring some weed
Originally posted by Surtur
Jordan Peterson, Tim Pool, Ben Shapiro.Man these people can trigger the saddest souls 🙂
To be honest I rarely hear about these people much anymore outside of this website. Peterson especially. That guy was really popular like 2 years ago and now it’s like he fell off the face of the earth. Milo too. Last thing I heard about Milo was that he lost his book deal a few years ago. Only other time I hear about him is when people make jokes about him getting banned on twitter.
Originally posted by BackFireyeah, don't disagree, this thread is 2018.
To be honest I rarely hear about these people much anymore outside of this website. Peterson especially. That guy was really popular like 2 years ago and now it’s like he fell off the face of the earth. Milo too. Last thing I heard about Milo was that he lost his book deal a few years ago. Only other time I hear about him is when people make jokes about him getting banned on twitter.