Compare the Harry Potter films just to the first Star Wars trilogy.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Star Wars is for Everybody. You are the one saying different and the only one here that is having Emotional Issues. Hence your Trump Derangement Syndrome poking is head into this "Debate". [/B]

Potter is more mature with far deeper characters than Han Solo and Chewbacca.

😂

Take the L.

Ha Solo and Chewbacca= Fun.

Harry Potter = lazy melodrama for kids.

And whats her face that wrote the Potter Books. Her Level of kooKooforCoCoPuffs is Way Higher Then Georgies.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Ha Solo and Chewbacca= Fun.

Harry Potter = lazy melodrama for kids.

And whats her face that wrote the Potter Books. Her Level of kooKooforCoCoPuffs is Way Higher Then Georgies. [/B]

The rest is more nonsense from a lonely idiot named fly who types in green font.

Which really just points out how you Cherry Picked out one line of Dialogue that Georgie said. Here is what He said in a Vid.

YouTube video

Yes. He Says they are for 12 year olds,and that the movies have Pshcyoligcal Issues in them, and that they are to ALSO HELP those 12 year old Grow Up. Stop ACTING like a 12 year old and Mature.

SOmething YOU Have NOT Done!

Hence your voting Democrat only.

Ha Ha!

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Which really just points out how you Cherry Picked out one line of Dialogue that Georgie said. Here is what He said in a Vid.

YouTube video

Yes. He Says they are for 12 year olds,and that the movies have Pshcyoligcal Issues in them, and that they are to ALSO HELP those 12 year old Grow Up. Stop ACTING like a 12 year old and Mature.

SOmething YOU Have NOT Done!

Hence your voting Democrat only.

Ha Ha! [/B]

I never said they did not have psychological issues in them but they are still intended for 12 year olds and above. Potter deals with more mature and psychological issues than these three Star Wars films.

You have a sub high school level intelligence level. Did you drop out?

Originally posted by quanchi112
You cannot even spell the word. 😂

I never said they did not have psychological issues in them but they are still intended for 12 year olds and above. Potter deals with more mature and psychological issues than these three Star Wars films.

You have a sub high school level intelligence level. Did you drop out?

No . You said they were just Dumb Kid Stuff.

You just Lied and tried to cover it up.

I accept your conceding.

😮‍💨

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]No . You said they were just Dumb Kid Stuff.

You just Lied and tried to cover it up.

I accept your conceding.

😮‍💨 [/B]

Potter deals with more mature issues than the Ot Star Wars. I accept your concession while duly noting your stupidity.

YOu said they were ONLY for 12 year olds.

You were Lying and also WRONG!

Conceding and incompetence.

You do both so well.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]YOu said they were ONLY for 12 year olds.

You were Lying and also WRONG!

Conceding and incompetence.

You do both so well. [/B]

No, they were made for kids 12 and up. You only have to be 12 to handle the psychological issues contained with the film unless you are an idiot like fly. I bet you cannot handle any of it but you are a mental midget.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No movie is ever intended for one single age alone..

That part is DEF NOT TRUE!

Lots of Movies are Aimed at Specific Groups.

You and your lying.

😂

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]That part is DEF NOT TRUE!

Lots of Movies are Aimed at Specific Groups.

You and your lying.

😂 [/B]

Except Star Wars which is only intended for 12 year old's. George Said So!

Lie Lie Lie.

It is all You do any more.

Originally posted by quanchi112

Potter deals with more mature issues than the Ot Star Wars.

Lmao no.

Potter is definitely more kiddish.

This is not even a debate you Star Wars hater.

Also I love how you are showing your true colours now Warner Bros boy 😂

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Lmao no.

Potter is definitely more kiddish.

This is not even a debate you Star Wars hater.

Also I love how you are showing your true colours now Warner Bros boy 😂

Originally posted by gold slorg
As far as movies alone go, HP > Star Wars. More mature themes, deeper characters. Original Trilogy was just a spark that started the fire, honestly it's hard to defend characters quality and plot maturity to HP, lol.

On the other hand, as far as their universes go, I much prefer SW due to insane scale and having basically everything possible, drama, comedy, mature, dark things, lighthearted comedy stuff, epic adventures, politics. SW expanded universe is greater to me since it has every shade possible, like an alternate unvierse literally.

Movies alone, yeah, HP trumps.

The ratings board, the deepness of the later films, and the ratings board overwhelmingly agrees. You are just up in your feelings like any woman that time of the month. Bart is a Star Wars fan and his honesty is appreciated and respected unlike your feelings based delusional opinion.

I love how you are all over the map and now admit my opinion is not company based. This changes from thread to thread because you never really have an actual legitimate basis just personal insults because you are another thoughtless dweeb.

Firstly, Disney is not responsible for the Ot nor have I ever said this trilogy was impressive to me. So I have been consistent and honest throughout my tenure on kmc unlike yourself. Secondly, Harry Potter to me is miles above the Ot trilogy. So this way I am clear. It is not about the companies it is about the films. Thirdly, if we are comparing companies Disney to Warner that is not a contest. Disney has given me my all time favorite film Infinity War and my favorite Star Wars film of The Last Jedi. Warner Bros. has given me two decent Fb films but neither were even close to these two films to me personally.

So while Disney is still my favorite studio that does not mean every Disney film is better than every Warner bros. release because that would be blind fanboyism which you admit moronically that I am not. You just are not bright enough to realize you talk out of both sides of your mouth because you hate me that much. I enjoy your hatred, boy.

Just remember George admits the films were made for 12 year olds whereas Potter gets 13 year old ratings thus making you factually incorrect. Continue to cry over it.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Except Star Wars which is only intended for 12 year old's. George Said So!

Lie Lie Lie.

It is all You do any more. [/B]

Originally posted by quanchi112
D. Thor you have been and always will be emotionally and factually wrong. To say you enjoy the Ot more than Harry Potter is fine as this is subjective but to suggest of films Lucas himself said were created for 12 year olds are more mature than Potter is absurd.

The ratings board, the deepness of the later films, and the ratings board overwhelmingly agrees. You are just up in your feelings like any woman that time of the month. Bart is a Star Wars fan and his honesty is appreciated and respected unlike your feelings based delusional opinion.

I love how you are all over the map and now admit my opinion is not company based. This changes from thread to thread because you never really have an actual legitimate basis just personal insults because you are another thoughtless dweeb.

Firstly, Disney is not responsible for the Ot nor have I ever said this trilogy was impressive to me. So I have been consistent and honest throughout my tenure on kmc unlike yourself. Secondly, Harry Potter to me is miles above the Ot trilogy. So this way I am clear. It is not about the companies it is about the films. Thirdly, if we are comparing companies Disney to Warner that is not a contest. Disney has given me my all time favorite film Infinity War and my favorite Star Wars film of The Last Jedi. Warner Bros. has given me two decent Fb films but neither were even close to these two films to me personally.

So while Disney is still my favorite studio that does not mean every Disney film is better than every Warner bros. release because that would be blind fanboyism which you admit moronically that I am not. You just are not bright enough to realize you talk out of both sides of your mouth because you hate me that much. I enjoy your hatred, boy.

Just remember George admits the films were made for 12 year olds whereas Potter gets 13 year old ratings thus making you factually incorrect. Continue to cry over it.

Holy crap what a total meltdown over a couple of lines.

Who cares who they are aimed for? If you cant tell The Philosophers Stone where the leads were all 10 year olds is more kiddish than ANH where the leads were all adults (one was 34), and that the latter is more likely to appeal to adults, then you are beyond Hope and repair. Thats the equivalence of not understanding that the Goonies appeals more to kids than Raiders of the Lost Arc. And Raiders more to adults than Goonies. You cant seriously be that retarded.

Disney worships the OT and have literally gone back there with the ST. Get over it.

Your Sig and Avatar shows where your allegiance lies (regardless of quality). But what you actually like and hate in terms of the material, and what naturally appeals to your 12 year old brain, is clear cut with this thread.

You are a Potter fanboy and have always hated Star Wars. Just trying to bandwagon because Disney bought it but no one is buying it.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Holy crap what a total meltdown over a couple of lines.

Who cares who they are aimed for. If you cant tell The Philosophers Stone where the leads were all 10 year olds is more kiddish than ANH where the leafs were all adults, and that the latter is more likely to appeal to adults, then you are beyond Hope and repair.

Disney worships the OT and have literally gone back there with the ST. Get over it.

Your Sig and Avatar shows where your allegiance lies (regardless of quality). But you actually like and hate in terms of the material is clear cut with this thread.

You are a Potter fanboy and have always hated Star Wars. Just trying to bandwagon because Disney bought it but no one is buying it.

I said the later films not every single one. You again now go to misrepresenting my position when thecratungs board factually disagrees with your feelings.

Disney is a company and wants to maximize profits so they want to appeal to the masses. Your feelings of them worshipping anything is just more of your own childlike perception attempting to make sense of a company trying to make money. TLJ went into new unchartered territory hence the backlash. Some fans could not handle it and resorted to crying over it. Either way it has nothing to do with my point you keep attempting to move the discussion away from the fact the later films are factually more mature than films designed for 12 year olds.

I love Disney not every film they release. Come on even a 12 year old could figure this out so why cant you.

I love both. Potter decimates the Ot which was never a Disney released franchise. The new trilogy I prefer vastly to the Ot as well.

I love multiple franchises but that is not the discussion so try to stay on topic and quit self harming over what I love. You hate the new trilogy and love the Ot. I was never a huge Star Wars fan until Disney. This is not a secret either. Your love of Star Wars is pre Disney. It will be ok, kid.

Originally posted by quanchi112

I said the later films not every single one.

And did I say EVERY SINGLE ONE is more childish? You've become an emotional wreck.

Clearly ANH and TPM are more childish than Deathly Hallows. But Philosopher Stone is more childish than any Star Wars film. And overall Potter is definitely the more childish franchise, given it starts with 10 years old lead characters, the nature of the way they use magic to showcase things in a very childish manner (e.g. talking, flying envelopes), and the over the top nature of the bullies (kids and adults).

Way to fail your own topic, by not being able to stand other people's opinions and becoming an emotional wreck over it.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
And did I say EVERY SINGLE ONE is more childish? You've become an emotional wreck.

Clearly ANH and TPM are more childish than Deathly Hallows. But Philosopher Stone is more childish than any Star Wars film. And overall Potter is definitely the more childish franchise, given it starts with 10 years old lead characters, the nature of the way they use magic to showcase things in a very childish manner (e.g. talking, flying envelopes), and the over the top nature of the bullies (kids and adults).

Way to fail your own topic, by not being able to stand other people's opinions and becoming an emotional wreck over it.

This is about the Ot films. Reread the op your vagina has led you to crazily and desperately going off topic.

Ewoks, Chewbacca, etc.

I respect a difference of opinion but lying that kiddie films are more mature than the later Potter films is la la land fanboyism. I get it your vagina bleeds and you start the incoherence and misrepresenting someone elses position because you get worked up. Slow down and breathe. It will be ok, chica.

Yes. It is fun to watch Quanni Pretend that Harry Movies are Adult and Serious when they solve all their problems by waving glowing sticks in the air.