Yoda vs Anakin

Originally posted by Xiggy
My god Thor, you've been in this game for eons and still greener than grass in the thinking department.

Anakin sword fights more often? With Yoda having 800+ years of mastery on his side? Yoda jumping around a lot is a necessity for him in combat. He's also a featherweight compared to any regular person with Superhuman augmentation. He jumps higher, no doubt he has a little more skill too.

Maybe I have been here too long because right now I feel like I am debating a couple of 10year olds😊

Clearly if you are also taking on this ridiculous argument that Yoda must be capable of jumping higher because his combat style involves a lot of small leaps around his opponent.

Tell me how high would he usually leap in a sword fight? Would it be the kind of heights Anakin or even Obi-Wan are capable of leaping at their best? I think not.

Also neither you nor Vik seem to understand that Mastery and Experience are not the Only factors relevant when it comes to Force augmentation.

Well, if there is an athlete who runs short laps for 7 years while another runs long laps for 2, who do you think can run the longest?

Do you get what I am saying?

Originally posted by The Ellimist
A hypothetical prime Yoda might win.

As of RotS, a motivated and unleashed Anakin wins.

Yoda wins. For logic reasons. Both Anakin and Obi-Wan are comparable in terms of Force abilities and lightsabre skills. If Kenobi was not suited to face Sidious, then Anakin is not suited to face Yoda either.

Originally posted by Freedon Nadd
Yoda wins. For logic reasons. Both Anakin and Obi-Wan are comparable in terms of Force abilities and lightsabre skills. If Kenobi was not suited to face Sidious, then Anakin is not suited to face Yoda either.

KEK.

Yoda outclasses him in sabers and especially in force

Originally posted by DarthCaedus77
KEK.

If anything - given that Lucas' canon applies to the Extended Universe - it is natural to state that Anakin<Yoda. Yoda is the reverse character of Sidious.

Midi-chlorians or not - Anakin was not yet powerful enough to defeat the likes of Palpatine and Yoda. He was on the same level as his Jedi Master.

Originally posted by Freedon Nadd
If anything - given that Lucas' canon applies to the Extended Universe - it is natural to state that Anakin<Yoda. Yoda is the reverse character of Sidious.

Midi-chlorians or not - Anakin was not yet powerful enough to defeat the likes of Palpatine and Yoda. He was on the same level as his Jedi Master.

Lucas himself stated Anakin was as powerful as Sidious. Nothing more to add, your entire argument becomes moot and is normie tier nonsense.

Originally posted by DarthCaedus77
Lucas himself stated Anakin was as powerful as Sidious. Nothing more to add, your entire argument becomes moot and is normie tier nonsense.

That means Kenobi is more powerful than Sidious given that both Kenobi and Anakin had that Force push content and neither was able to penetrate through the other's Force defenses.
Oh, wait, Yoda literally said that Kenobi is not powerful enough to take on Sidious.
It does not take enough to an intelligent being to understand such trivial things.

First off this post legit caused me to lose brain cells just reading it.

That means Kenobi is more powerful than Sidious given that both Kenobi and Anakin had that Force push content and neither was able to penetrate through the other's Force defenses.

Using an emotional wreck who was hindered as the basis for your argument when we're discussing peak Anakin is retarded.

Oh, wait, Yoda literally said that Kenobi is not powerful enough to take on Sidious.

The one correct thing in this post.

It does not take enough to an intelligent being to understand such trivial things.

Being told this by a ****ing troll who cannot grasp basic concepts is hilarious. Anakin was confirmed to be as strong as Sidious, go spew your bullshit somewhere else.

No. I think you have a problem with your brain cells. The original poster stated the primes of these characters represented on the screen, books, et cetera

The original poster was not referring to the supposed "full potential" Anakin who had the "potential" strength in The
Force, more or less, of a One

If it's just plain RotS Anakin, Yoda wins. KF Vader? Might be a different story.

Originally posted by Freedumb Nadd
No. I think you have a problem with your brain cells. The original poster stated the primes of these characters represented on the screen, books, et cetera

The original poster was not referring to the supposed "full potential" Anakin who had the "potential" strength in The
Force, more or less, of a One

Except Anakin was stated to be as powrful as Sidious as of ROTS, not full potential Anakin. How can anybody be this ****ing braindead.

^quote

Yoda wins.

Originally posted by DarthCaedus77
Except Anakin was stated to be as powrful as Sidious as of ROTS, not full potential Anakin. How can anybody be this ****ing braindead.

Where was it stated? You mean his own words or Lucas'? Lucas spews a lot of bullshit.

Yoda rapes.

This is already the worst thread in KMC history, and we're only two pages in. 2005 debating > KMC 2018

Yoda, in the fight of his life.

I get Knightfall Vader winning this, but how is standard Anakin not getting impregnated?

Originally posted by RealistRacism
I get Knightfall Vader winning this, but how is standard Anakin not getting impregnated?