Originally posted by Robtard
We going to do that thing again, where we pretend Comey reopened the investigation into Clinton days before the election and it was actually to help her win? Joy.
Still think he did it to help Hillary win to prove that Hillary was clean so people would have it fresh in their minds that Hillary was clean and the biggest dirt Trump had on her was wrong.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Still think he did it to help Hillary win to prove that Hillary was clean so people would have it fresh in their minds that Hillary was clean and the biggest dirt Trump had on her was wrong.
Bingo, the fact his attempt to help her hilariously backfired does not negate what his intentions were.
Well, the agents that interviewed Flynn said he didn't lie, as did Comey.So why did he plead guilty to that? Me thinks he was coerced. Mueller even said Flynn had been so cooperative that he didnt deserve jail time.
That right there certainly takes away the "Mueller is a righteous man doing his job for Murica" type of ideal.
That said this won't have an impact on the investigation.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Anything to attack the investigation.
If the investigation is doing what it needs to do and is doing things appropriately then there would be no room to question certain things that have been done.
In the case of Flynn he pled guilty to lying to the FBI and the actual FBI agents that spoke with him said he didn't lie. Seems there is a disconnect between what the agents reported and what the prosecutors wanted.
Besides mobs chanting lock her up have zero legal authority so that's a moot point. The individuals that enforce and prosecute US law can shut down your life like a lawn chair, they need to be better than a "mob."
Originally posted by snowdragonWhat about trumps tweets, firings, obstructive tweets ? Sure, more of the same poor Donnie let us judge everyone else nonsense but not Donald and the guys pleading guilty to crimes.
If the investigation is doing what it needs to do and is doing things appropriately then there would be no room to question certain things that have been done.In the case of Flynn he pled guilty to lying to the FBI and the actual FBI agents that spoke with him said he didn't lie. Seems there is a disconnect between what the agents reported and what the prosecutors wanted.
Besides mobs chanting lock her up have zero legal authority so that's a moot point. The individuals that enforce and prosecute US law can shut down your life like a lawn chair, they need to be better than a "mob."
😂
Originally posted by snowdragon
If the investigation is doing what it needs to do and is doing things appropriately then there would be no room to question certain things that have been done.In the case of Flynn he pled guilty to lying to the FBI and the actual FBI agents that spoke with him said he didn't lie. Seems there is a disconnect between what the agents reported and what the prosecutors wanted.
Besides mobs chanting lock her up have zero legal authority so that's a moot point. The individuals that enforce and prosecute US law can shut down your life like a lawn chair, they need to be better than a "mob."
👆