Originally posted by quanchi112
More trolling this forfeiting the debate.
Good for you Quan. Admittance is the first step.
Originally posted by Surtur^Actual transcript of a back forth between Comey and a congressmen lol.
Switch out the name Hillary for Trump, does anyone think Comey would still say "no reasonable prosecutor would ever bring charges"?
So what did you think about the Judge in this trial having his little Ranty Melt down and the lying about the case the other day Surt?
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Good for you Quan. Admittance is the first step.So what did you think about the Judge in this trial having his little Ranty Melt down and the lying about the case the other day Surt? [/B]
You mean the judge accusing Flynn of treason? Yeah that was crazy...and silly.
The judge has since apologized, but that of course is only after there were many headlines about it.
Meadows: You expect us to believe that you got notation that a private client is there and that you didn't -- you weren't inquisitive enough to figure out who the private client was?
Comey: Who cares? It was Republicans opposed to Trump --
Meadows: Well, it makes a big difference.
Comey: Let me finish my answer. It was Republicans opposed to Trump, and then it was Democrats opposed to Trump. There was potential bias in this information. That's really important. Whether it was Sally Smith of Joe Jones, Republican, or Sally Smith, Democrat, to me it didn't matter.
Meadows: Director Comey, it does make a difference. If someone is paying for this, and you're actually using that information to surveil American citizens with a FISA application, it does matter...
Comey is kind of a piece of shit lol.
Originally posted by Surtur
[b]Meadows: You expect us to believe that you got notation that a private client is there and that you didn't -- you weren't inquisitive enough to figure out who the private client was?Comey: Who cares? It was Republicans opposed to Trump --
Meadows: Well, it makes a big difference.
Comey: Let me finish my answer. It was Republicans opposed to Trump, and then it was Democrats opposed to Trump. There was potential bias in this information. That's really important. Whether it was Sally Smith of Joe Jones, Republican, or Sally Smith, Democrat, to me it didn't matter.
Meadows: Director Comey, it does make a difference. If someone is paying for this, and you're actually using that information to surveil American citizens with a FISA application, it does matter...
Comey is kind of a piece of shit lol. [/B]
Explain to me why this is important. I don't understand the context.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Explain to me why this is important. I don't understand the context.
It's about the dossier. Comey is repeating debunked information when he tries to do the "Republicans did it too". Yes there was a point they did, but they stopped. Then later on Christopher Steele was brought in and he is the one who put the dossier together.
I'm not sure why Comey doesn't know this. It's shocking to me if he doesn't. He also doesn't seem to think it matters who put this information together(IMO it does)
Originally posted by Surtur
It's about the dossier. Comey is repeating debunked information when he tries to do the "Republicans did it too". Yes there was a point they did, but they stopped. Then later on Christopher Steele was brought in and he is the one who put the dossier together.I'm not sure why Comey doesn't know this. It's shocking to me if he doesn't. He also doesn't seem to think it matters who put this information together(IMO it does)
Makes much more sense, now. Thanks.
It's very important to understand what the Democrats were up to. The Democrats are just so much better than the Republicans at this PR stuff that it's pitiful.
What is telling is the litigative fallout after the dossier was released. Dems started suing Buzzfeed for releasing it. Because it clearly demonstrates what a terrible and corrupt organization the Democratic Party really is. And who the players are in that corruption. The best reaction is to sue for defamation to vehemently deny activity despite the fact that the intelligence community has repeatedly said the dossier has not been proven false.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Makes much more sense, now. Thanks.It's very important to understand what the Democrats were up to. The Democrats are just so much better than the Republicans at this PR stuff that it's pitiful.
What is telling is the litigative fallout after the dossier was released. Dems started suing Buzzfeed for releasing it. Because it clearly demonstrates what a terrible and corrupt organization the Democratic Party really is. And who the players are in that corruption. The best reaction is to sue for defamation to vehemently deny activity despite the fact that the intelligence community has repeatedly said the dossier has not been proven false.
Also scroll up to and look at the exchange between Comey and Radcliffe. It just sounds so damn insane when you spell out what was done and he still goes "no reasonable person would charge her!"