Comic Book Questions & Discussion

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Again youre making claims and assumptions. When did the comics state the process of replacing the multiverse makes wfs multiverse unstable.
And the editor part I already addressed multiple times.

So the question is simple(Which Ive already asked you many times). Do you have any on panel, solid, unambiguous proof to support your claims.

You're a complete ****ing clown, This is a PRIME example of people wanting a smoke and gun scenario rather than using common sense. 🤦🏾‍♂️ If the multiverse crumbled during the process then it was unstable...either before or during the process. The editor is even translating what took place for context. He filled us in...THAT is the proof. I've ALREADY SEEn what you're attempting to use as evidence and its insufficient to proof that during the process it would remain stable. If superman did not need to attack the World Forger than he would have not needed to race to him in time. He could have just smashed before hitting the world forger. he NEEDED to stop the WF, THAT's was the main issue 🤦🏾‍♂️ And in stopping him during the process destabilize the incoming multiverse and made it crumble. It's SIMPLE f you use common sense just to listen to the editor.

Trying to make an argument on how well developed the new multiverse was isn't helping your case period, and it's not my claim, It's the editor which i'll take him over you or any super stan words any day over the comic he was authorized on. Deal with it.

Originally posted by Diesldude
comics we’re trash this week so there’s nothing else to talk about.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
You're a complete ****ing clown, This is a PRIME example of people wanting a smoke and gun scenario rather than using common sense. 🤦🏾‍♂️ If the multiverse crumbled during the process then it was unstable...either before or during the process. The editor is even translating what took place for context. He filled us in...THAT is the proof. I've ALREADY SEEn what you're attempting to use as evidence and its insufficient to proof that during the process it would remain stable. If superman did not need to attack the World Forger than he would have not needed to race to him in time. He could have just smashed before hitting the world forger. he NEEDED to stop the WF, THAT's was the main issue 🤦🏾‍♂️ And in stopping him during the process destabilize the incoming multiverse and made it crumble. It's SIMPLE f you use common sense just to listen to the editor.

She nervously crumbled the bread between her fingers.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Trying to make an argument on how well developed the new multiverse was isn't helping your case period, and it's not my claim, It's the editor which i'll take him over you or any super stan words any day over the comic he was authorized on. Deal with it.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Just to point out though that Marino was only posting on his personal account, where his thoughts are his own and not those of DC...

So we can't really use that, as it becomes circular - you disagree with what Snyder thinks, a supporter of that feat would disagree with what Marino thinks etc etc...

All we have to go on is what is on panel, not what they may say in a Twitter or whatever.

Originally posted by Galan007
And this is exactly why Twitter posts and whatnot are inadmissible on the forums...

People trying to cling to them as the gospel, in lieu of on panel evidence, is the epitome of trollishly grasping at straws.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Editors aren't writers...

Originally posted by Sin I AM
And watching albert have a meltdown is entertainment?

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
I mean crumble doesnt necessarily mean unstable
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/crumble
"to break, or cause something to break, into small pieces:"

So that isnt proof, Its your head canon at best.
You claimed during the process this multiverse is unstable then you should be the one who giving definite evidence. Not other way around
I mean Superman stopped WF by smashing WF with his punch. And I dont get why Superman didnt need to race to wf in time, WF is his enemy so he surely needed to deal with him as quickly as possible
https://ibb.co/2Y7HSsZ
https://ibb.co/7NhWnKL
https://ibb.co/FsgvNfL
https://ibb.co/Zh6Vqvz
https://ibb.co/vv5Gr6T

😂 there my boy!! You went to academics ...proud of you! Lol
But unfortunately unstable is an adjective
And crumble is a noun and a verb.
So you can't try to intertwine them. Unstable is a word to assist to the main point...which is crumble ( verb...action)
You did good going to the dictionary but grammar and sentences structure wins the day.
My argument is still...wait for it...stable.

You haven't proven a single yet, keep trying.

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
And you go back to editor again.

It cant be used because 1 It isnt official 2 Mods on this forum specifically said we cant use it as proof and editors arent equal to writers.
And as from what Ive seen, You havent given any proof to support your claims so you basically lose this argument. Deal with it, PERIOD

I don't give an absolute shit what you think about the editor, If I have to sit here and explain why his opinion superseded YOURS AND explain why the editor and chief of the book opinion has more credibility than yours then you're just trolling and just trying to argue (which you are)

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
😂 there my boy!! You went to academics ...proud of you! Lol
But unfortunately unstable is an adjective
And crumble is a noun and a verb.
So you can't try to intertwine them. Unstable is a word to assist to the main point...which is crumble ( verb...action)
You did good going to the dictionary but grammar and sentences structure wins the day.
My argument is still...wait for it...stable.

You haven't proven a single yet, keep trying.

She nervously crumbled the bread between her fingers.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
I don't give an absolute shit what you think about the editor, If I have to sit here and explain why his opinion superseded YOURS AND explain why the editor and chief of the book opinion has more credibility than yours then you're just trolling and just trying to argue (which you are)

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Well, No. It says
"to break, or cause something to break, into small pieces:"
It doesnt translate to the thing that he/she/it breaks is unstable
See this illustration

This bread isnt unstable, But you still can use "crumbled".
So again, You should stop giving your head canon, Providing actual evidence instead. Or just admitted youre wrong

Yeah no, unstable or stable is an adjective. Crumble is a noun or a verb. Nice try tho

😂 I'm still waiting for the proof that Superman "destroyed" the multiverse with his fist BTW.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Yeah no, unstable or stable is an adjective. Crumble is a noun or a verb. Nice try tho

😂 I'm still waiting for the proof that Superman "destroyed" the multiverse with his fist BTW.

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
So you admitted crumble doesnt necessarily mean unstable, Good.
Now please prove WFs multiverse was unstable during the process
And the proof Superman destroyed the multiverse
"My masterpiece.....You destroyed it"
https://ibb.co/vv5Gr6T
"This multiverse is my masterpiece"
https://readcomiconline.to/Comic/Justice-League-2018/Issue-21?id=152935#12

I didn't admit anything, idek what you're on about. And yeah no The editor and chief is saying one world was stable. So all the ppl that have common sense would know that means the other wasn't. you NEED to understand how a adjective and a verb works with each other. And then you will get my position and the editor and chief position, period.

You've YET to make a single point 😂

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
I didn't admit anything, idek what you're on about. And yeah no The editor and chief is saying one world was stable. So all the ppl that have common sense would know that means the other wasn't. you NEED to understand how a adjective and a verb works with each other. And then you will get my position and the editor and chief position, period.

You've YET to make a single point 😂

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Just to point out though that Marino was only posting on his personal account, where his thoughts are his own and not those of DC...

So we can't really use that, as it becomes circular - you disagree with what Snyder thinks, a supporter of that feat would disagree with what Marino thinks etc etc...

All we have to go on is what is on panel, not what they may say in a Twitter or whatever.

Originally posted by Galan007
And this is exactly why Twitter posts and whatnot are inadmissible on the forums...

People trying to cling to them as the gospel, in lieu of on panel evidence, is the epitome of trollishly grasping at straws.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Editors aren't writers...

😂 concession accepted 👍

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
😂 concession accepted 👍

😂 My guy that's the 2nd time you ran too the mods seeking for backup again. that's twice in the row i've had to spank you badly to the point you gotta report me to avoid confrontation, That's MORE than enough of a W for me LMAO. You're dismissed

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
😂 My guy that's the 2nd time you ran too the mods seeking for backup again. that's twice in the row i've had to spank you badly to the point you gotta report me to avoid confrontation, That's MORE than enough of a W for me LMAO. You're dismissed

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
You didn't dispute anything I said but claimed it was irrelevant despite it being VERY relevant. We were discussing Art/Subjective the ENTIRE time, but when i help you understand what it means it's not "relevant" yeah right. I won this argument a long time ago 😂

It must be lovely to have reality be whatever you want to tell yourself it is.

Your original post said Iron Fist was better than any DC show. That's it. No qualifiers.

So are you going to continue doubling down? Or are you going to be mature about it and admit you weren't clear?

Edit: And no, just so we're clear, you've moved the goalposts several times, and replied to my posts with statements that do nothing to address what I actually said.

Originally posted by -Pr-
It must be lovely to have reality be whatever you want to tell yourself it is.

Your original post said Iron Fist was better than any DC show. That's it. No qualifiers.

So are you going to continue doubling down? Or are you going to be mature about it and admit you weren't clear?

Edit: And no, just so we're clear, you've moved the goalposts several times, and replied to my posts with statements that do nothing to address what I actually said.

It is, easily. and I stand by that. I've already proved my point, whether you wanna be humble and accept that YOU were wrong is up to you. I KNOW I'm right