Originally posted by Astner
I hinted it in the other thread but I'm considering making a chart properly correlating destructive capacity to energy output, where I deduce equations for much energy it would take to destroy an arbitrary portion of the planet, and disintegrate planets, stars and exotic objects like white dwarfs, and neutron stars and quasars (that require careful consideration of quantum-relativistic effects), and also a formula for the energy of a wave that would destroy anything within a specified perimeter of a a spherical object with a specified gravitational binding energy and radius. As well as some miscellaneous stuff like the deduction of the gravitational binding of galaxies, and whatnot.I've derived most of the equations, what's left is to write out what the **** I'm actually trying to explain and make some visual references in Illustrator.
Would people here be interested in such a chart?
Originally posted by cdtm
Do one for dodging lightning from the sky compared to knocking aside five or six bullets from point blank range.
But I could provide a reference sheet on basic values like this.
Originally posted by Astner
Originally posted by Astner👆
I hinted it in the other thread but I'm considering making a chart properly correlating destructive capacity to energy output, where I deduce equations for much energy it would take to destroy an arbitrary portion of the planet, and disintegrate planets, stars and exotic objects like white dwarfs, and neutron stars and quasars (that require careful consideration of quantum-relativistic effects), and also a formula for the energy of a wave that would destroy anything within a specified perimeter of a a spherical object with a specified gravitational binding energy and radius. As well as some miscellaneous stuff like the deduction of the gravitational binding of galaxies, and whatnot.I've derived most of the equations, what's left is to write out what the **** I'm actually trying to explain and make some visual references in Illustrator.
Would people here be interested in such a chart?
Originally posted by carver9
The show is amazing.
The Invincible series is awesome.
So, I'm just gonna say it. DC had ONE thing it excelled at. Animation. But between Sony's Miles Morales movies (sequel upcoming) and Invincible, they're in danger. DC looks like it's about to lose the LAST category it's winning and the hater in me couldn't be laughing any harder 😂 😂 both companies put out products that exceeded the quality of DC animated movies. 👍💪
Also @cdtm Who’d they race shift? The shit with Rex Splode happens in the books iirc.
Originally posted by MrMindI think theyve already introduced the linearverse in GENERATIONS SHATTERED
I thought dc is already composite canon, why are they introducing linearversedc is having a stroke as we speak
Edit:Yeah, Just checked it. This is a old news. DC just gave shit explanations for the long life spans of their characters: They(including batman) just aging slower than normal people lol
