Comic Book Questions & Discussion

Ah ok. He has OdinOdinForce lmao. Makes sense. The OOF.

So back before all this happened, back when Odin was a Skyfather, he had the Odinforce but also the OdinFORCE. You are right Carv, it all makes sense.

Lmmfao

I don't like this retcon. 🙁

So how do we handle Hanbooks? Because TOAA recently appeared in The Periodic Table of Marvel, and according to it Starlin's Thanos: Infinity Ending did happen.

Handbook entries are supplementary evidence. They can be used so long as they do not explicitly contradict elements from the source material itself... And in this case, I don't really see a contradiction, because I was under the impression that Starlin's most recent "Infinity" stories were intended to be canon. /shrug

...And the bio also notes that Starlin's iteration of TOAA = the Kirby avatar from F4 #511.

I remember there being a disagreement concerning its canonicity.

The argument mainly revolved around Brevoort's Tweets where he wrote that Marvel: The End wasn't canon, and since it was referenced in the Infinity-series people argued that they had to be non-canonical for referencing a non-canon event.

Originally posted by Astner
So how do we handle Hanbooks? Because TOAA recently appeared in The Periodic Table of Marvel, and according to it Starlin's Thanos: Infinity Ending did happen.

Originally posted by Astner
I remember there being a disagreement concerning its canonicity.

The argument mainly revolved around Brevoort's Tweets where he wrote that Marvel: The End wasn't canon, and since it was referenced in the Infinity-series people argued that they had to be non-canonical for referencing a non-canon event.

Events from "The End", for example, were referenced in numerous sources outside of the main series. That is to say: there is a LOT more on panel evidence to support the canonicity of "The End" and the recent "Infinity" books, then there is to the contrary. A few Tweets from Brevoort should not be able to retcon published material.

None of it is canon unless it helps my argument 👆

well theres also only 1 toaa in marvel, so all of his showings should at least be canon to him no matter what.

true darkseid getting killed by black adam lmfao

Originally posted by Galan007
That's why random Tweets and the like hold even less validity than Handbooks in this medium.

Events from "The End", for example, were referenced in numerous sources outside of the main series. That is to say: there is a LOT more on panel evidence to support the canonicity of "The End" and the recent "Infinity" books, then there is to the contrary. A few Tweets from Brevoort should not be able to retcon published material.

Doesn't The End have its own designation number, which is different than 616?

I honestly didn't expect to find you of all people so deep in Starlin's ass mmm biscuits

Lmao. Nah, I don't think Starlin has been good since the original IG saga.

I just think in the case of his "The End" story, it was definitely intended to be canon. There's just a bunch of evidence painting that picture.

Originally posted by MrMind
true darkseid getting killed by black adam lmfao

If this happens, would this scoot Black Adam up on the tier list or would this be a low showing for Darkseid? Asking for a reason. And yes, I know this is fan art.

It would be treated like WW fighting Phantom Stranger. Disregarded by people when it suits them 👆

Man they could have went so many different ways with Odin/Banner being not truly there and only figments of each characters imagination. God marvel writer's lack depth sometimes

I licked unclean anus yesterday

Originally posted by carver9
If this happens, would this scoot Black Adam up on the tier list or would this be a low showing for Darkseid? Asking for a reason. And yes, I know this is fan art.

This isnt fan art

fukin dc horry shiiit

darkseid getting owned by his own omega effect lmfao

Hasn't he always been effected by his own beams?