Originally posted by MrMind
I mean from dc or marvelI dont read indie
In that case Tales from the Dark Multiverse.
And technically Max Lord in the entire Justice League run from the 90's, retroactively.
Even though it doesn't make sense because Keith Giffen actually shows us Max Lords most intimate thoughts, including his dreams, and he always was inspired by J'on and the rest to become a hero and NEVER had nefarious intentions.
So slowly making my way through Gargoyles.
As good a villain as David Xanatos is, does anyone else feel he was kind of aimless. Like, Demona was clearly a villain, MacBeth was more an anti-hero with clear goals, but Xanatos was all over the map. One episode he'd try and murder the Gargoyles, another he'd try and help them. He definitely committed villainous acts but he had no real motivations, never really attoned for past misdeeds, and thus had no real arc.
He was the bad guy until he wasn't, because.
.
Originally posted by cdtm
In that case Tales from the Dark Multiverse.And technically Max Lord in the entire Justice League run from the 90's, retroactively.
Even though it doesn't make sense because Keith Giffen actually shows us Max Lords most intimate thoughts, including his dreams, and he always was inspired by J'on and the rest to become a hero and NEVER had nefarious intentions.
Or Lord's telepathy is so potent that he had everyone fooled.
Originally posted by cdtmMaxwell Lord 4th wall tp'ed us, the audience. 👆
It was all exclusively for the audience though, adventures by himself in some abandoned lair or at home in bed dreaming.
I admired how Bendis handled the build-up to Secret Invasion in his Avengers books. IIRC, in Mighty Avengers, the characters constantly had thought bubbles showing their thoughts. In New Avengers, no thought bubbles at all. That way, he could hide Spider-Woman's reveal as a Skrull.
Interesting
https://i.ibb.co/3mmdQcZ/81-Se-IL7-TKL.webp
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Interesting
https://i.ibb.co/3mmdQcZ/81-Se-IL7-TKL.webp
It's kind of interesting to see these companies plagiarizing each other still, despite being very protective of their own intellectual properties. Marvel very clearly has a case here for copyright infringement of expression. But guidebooks don't sell that well, so the litigation costs of the pretrial alone would probably exceed whatever they'd receive in damages.
Originally posted by Astner
It's kind of interesting to see these companies plagiarizing each other still, despite being very protective of their own intellectual properties. Marvel very clearly has a case here for copyright infringement of expression. But guidebooks don't sell that well, so the litigation costs of the pretrial alone would probably exceed whatever they'd receive in damages.
I mean
https://www.amazon.com/DC-Comics-Metahuman-S-D-Perry/dp/1608875016
https://www.amazon.com/Marvel-Anatomy-Scientific-Study-Superhuman/dp/1683838696
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Interesting
https://i.ibb.co/3mmdQcZ/81-Se-IL7-TKL.webp
Originally posted by abhilegend
What book is it from?
https://bleedingcool.com/comics/dk-to-publish-a-dc-comics-periodic-table-of-their-characters/
Originally posted by Astnerno, they don't 😂
Marvel very clearly has a case here for copyright infringement of expression.
Originally posted by AstnerThe periodic table is public domain. Marvel is riffing on public domain but they don't have a right to it. They wouldn't receive a cent in damages.
But guidebooks don't sell that well, so the litigation costs of the pretrial alone would probably exceed whatever they'd receive in damages.