Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!no stalkyness. Search your username with the term "girls" and it's the first page - post was from less than a year ago.
yeah, talking about my early 20's go on... this stalkyness is truly interesting.Jared Leto her "boyfriend" in it was also in his 20's. It's also clearly tongue-in-cheek. Best you've got?
I didn't click further but obviously there's a bunch of stuff.
Worth considering before you keep throwing mud about ODG and... gifs?
Originally posted by Smurphnot at all context is key it was about my early twenties when I watched it and it's clearly tongue in cheek as most of my posts are. Worth thinking about my stalky pal, you are a good friend to him. 😂 you were quick posting his defense after that sock, tag team Whirly 😂 all good. 🙂
no stalkyness. Search your username with the term "girls" and it's the first page - post was from less than a year ago.I didn't click further but obviously there's a bunch of stuff.
Worth considering before you keep throwing mud about ODG and... gifs?
Originally posted by Smurphthat's fine if in the context of the discussion they truly are. Although, clearly context is an easy one for normal people. Although getting this stalky isn't quite right in any context... is it Smurph? You tell me. 🙂 all good!
Oh okThen all my posts are tongue in cheek too
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!"normal people", "context" , weird isn't it
that's fine if in the context of the discussion they truly are. Although, clearly context is an easy one for normal people. Although getting this stalky isn't quite right in any context... is it Smurph? You tell me. 🙂 all good!
what's the context in which sexualizing teens is normal, but calling out the sexualizing of teens isn't?
oh... "dad jokes"
Originally posted by Smurphyeah, but you are missing the context of the discussion at the time. But that's cool, keep being stalky, post some more of my history. I'll enjoy it. 🙂 my Dad jokes did trigger, which was interesting.
"normal people", "context" , weird isn't itwhat's the context in which sexualizing teens is normal, but calling out the sexualizing of teens isn't?
oh... "dad jokes"
I mean, on its face, it's weird for somebody in their early twenties to want to mosh with 15 year olds.
(and... were you in your early twenties in 1994?)
Weirder still to describe a 12 y/o as titillating.
In my best British terms: "dad jokes" doesn't begin to cover it, mate. Maybe best to just cop to sometimes being a bit creepy?
Originally posted by SmurphAhh, so you are going back on your previous post re, the period. As you try and help your friend out with a new narrative. Also interesting, when was it something I said hurt your feefees or is it just he is your best friend? Delicious. 😂
I mean, on its face, it's weird for somebody in their early twenties to want to mosh with 15 year olds.(and... were you in your early twenties in 1994?)
Weirder still to describe a 12 y/o as titillating.
In my best British terms: "dad jokes" doesn't begin to cover it, mate. Maybe best to just cop to sometimes being a bit creepy?
Originally posted by Smurph
"normal people", "context" , weird isn't itwhat's the context in which sexualizing teens is normal, but calling out the sexualizing of teens isn't?
oh... "dad jokes"
Originally posted by DiesldudeYeah. I suppose the difference is that Whril is in his 60s.
I think in that post he’s talking about watching it in the past for the girls. Doesn’t mean he sees them the same way now. I know I wouldn’t look at the young actress the same way now than the way I used to when I was 15-17.
When I was younger I thought Kelly Kapowski was hot. (She’s older than me btw) but I wouldn’t look at those episodes of saved by the bell the same way now
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!Honestly you just seem like you're desperately reaching for a ledge to cling to and I've been trying to offer one.
Ahh, so you are going back on your previous post re, the period. As you try and help your friend out with a new narrative. Also interesting, when was it something I said hurt your feefees or is it just he is your best friend? Delicious. 😂
Originally posted by Smurph
okContext: My So-Called Life. I think Claire Danes was 15. /shrug
14.
I was way too terrified. It was very fraternal... and he was actually pretty protective of me. I think I made it clear, too, from the beginning that I wasn't that kind of 14-year-old. I was truly 14.
Originally posted by Smurphlol 50's, btw... how late is it in Canada? I'm getting a pattern here.
Yeah. I suppose the difference is that Whril is in his 60s.
Originally posted by DiesldudePretty much, that and irony, it's a similar kind of comment to they'll break a few hearts when they are older, buy in a more humorous and jokey context. I love Smurph is so stalky, I always thought he was a normalise poster, but he's also up in the early hours. 🙂 Delicious.
I think in that post he’s talking about watching it in the past for the girls. Doesn’t mean he sees them the same way now. I know I wouldn’t look at the young actress the same way now than the way I used to when I was 15-17.
When I was younger I thought Kelly Kapowski was hot. (She’s older than me btw) but I wouldn’t look at those episodes of saved by the bell the same way now
Originally posted by StiltmanFTWbut the context is a joke as to why I was watching a teenage girls show 😂 So stalky.
14.I was way too terrified. It was very fraternal... and he was actually pretty protective of me. I think I made it clear, too, from the beginning that I wasn't that kind of 14-year-old. I was truly 14.
Why were you watching hing a teenGe girls show.
I was watching it for the teenage girls. It's funny as **** if you are normal and not staying up all night to post gifs of little girls or search histories. 🙂