Oh, ok, I mean, I can declare until I'm blue in the face that I'm not that kind of person, that I don't engage in that kind of behaviour, and that the term does not apply to me.....
But that wouldn't convince you, would it? Because you've formed an opinion based on what you've read of my posts.
Interesting, that 🙂
Originally posted by DarkSaint85I have no opinion mate, what you are posting may be completely contrary to your views. That said, I also have no idea who the sock is, but. I did certainly trigger a reaction. That's cause and affect rather than a single post where a comma was used instead of a run on or full stop. 🙂
Oh, ok, I mean, I can declare until I'm blue in the face that I'm not that kind of person, that I don't engage in that kind of behaviour, and that the term does not apply to me.....But that wouldn't convince you, would it? Because you've formed an opinion based on what you've read of my posts.
Interesting, that 🙂
Originally posted by Pervysplat
Pervysplat, you wankyprat the song is Gold digger, you cretinous simpleton. Your third-world and almost undoubtedly moronic gold-digging, likely retarded wife and mongoloid mixed-race kids are precisely what a pedo like you deserves. You can babble on about context and commas, but we know the context; we know comma's. You can say we are staying up all night stalking you, but a pedo you are and a pedo you will ever be. As ODG stated, you are the perfect place for a pedo in the Middle East. You probably **** goats with the other ragheads too.
Originally posted by MrMind
whirly will be that creepy old man who marry teenage girl in his 70s
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Wow.
The investment. I suspect Astro Waifu in the members list browsing is one of the anti-Whirly socks too. 🙂
Hulk lifts (while weakened) a condense, unbreakable, core of a planet, while weakened. The Hulks around him are planet busters and is supposedly weaker than a non-weakened Hulk. Just to put this into perspective, a small planet core can weigh up to 6 septillion lbs. He's weakened and not angry. Hulk stomps.
https://ibb.co/ynbFHQb
https://ibb.co/19wttbv
https://ibb.co/SdcgY1G
https://ibb.co/gdNyfT1
Originally posted by carver9
Hulk lifts (while weakened) a condense, unbreakable, core of a planet, while weakened. The Hulks around him are planet busters and is supposedly weaker than a non-weakened Hulk. Just to put this into perspective, a small planet core can weigh up to 6 septillion lbs. He's weakened and not angry. Hulk stomps.https://ibb.co/ynbFHQb
https://ibb.co/19wttbv
https://ibb.co/SdcgY1G
https://ibb.co/gdNyfT1
How much is that in tons?
Originally posted by carver9
Hulk lifts (while weakened) a condense, unbreakable, core of a planet, while weakened. The Hulks around him are planet busters and is supposedly weaker than a non-weakened Hulk. Just to put this into perspective, a small planet core can weigh up to 6 septillion lbs. He's weakened and not angry. Hulk stomps.https://ibb.co/ynbFHQb
https://ibb.co/19wttbv
https://ibb.co/SdcgY1G
https://ibb.co/gdNyfT1
The EARTH'S core is 6 septillion lbs, or 2.72septillion kg (Source: https://www.livescience.com/64042-earth-weight-in-neutrinos.html#:~:text=(6%20septillion%20kg).,percent%20of%20Earth's%20total%20mass.. A 'small' planet (or moon, as they say) would likely be lower than this (depending on your definition of small. But they liken it to a moon as well, so we can use our Moon as a base?)
In perspective, 6 sept lbs is ~45% of the Earth's total mass.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Wrong, or at best, misleading.The EARTH'S core is 6 septillion lbs, or 2.72septillion kg. A 'small' planet (or moon, as they say) would likely be lower than this (depending on your definition of small. But they liken it to a moon as well, so we can use our Moon as a base?)
In perspective, 6 sept lbs is ~45% of the Earth's total mass.
He did mention planet OR moons but right after that he mentions the ball Hulk is lifting is the strongest of them all (planet>>>moon and obviously the strongest of them all would NOT come from the smallest and weakest of planets). Then he mentions this ball coming straight from a planet. Thanks for the calculations though.
Originally posted by carver9
He did mention planet OR moons but right after that he mentions the ball Hulk is lifting is the strongest of them all (planet>>>moon and obviously the strongest of them all would NOT come from the smallest and weakest of planets). Then he mentions this ball coming straight from a planet. Thanks for the calculations though.
Or it is super-condensed. Like having a piece of tinfoil or paper - if you scrunch it up and condense it as much as possible, it becomes stronger and stronger the more you scrunch it.
Mercury, for example, has a mass 5.5% of Earth in total. The core would then be ~50% of this? So 2.5% of Earth's total mass.
Putting this all into perspective.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Or it is super-condensed. Like having a piece of tinfoil or paper - if you scrunch it up and condense it as much as possible, it becomes stronger and stronger the more you scrunch it.Mercury, for example, has a mass 5.5% of Earth in total. The core would then be ~50% of this? So 2.5% of Earth's [b]total
mass.Putting this all into perspective. [/B]
So you're saying the ones before wasn't super condense, they just decided to super condense this one? Do you not see the reaching you're doing here?
Originally posted by carver9
So you're saying the ones before wasn't super condense, they just decided to super condense this one? Do you not see the reaching you're doing here?
To make it the strongest one of all, yeah. That's....kinda how diamonds are formed, under extreme pressure, after all. They broke the last two, so this time they could've just decided to compress it more, to make it stronger.
And again, my main point still stands - a 'small' planet can be like Mercury, which is only 6% the mass of Earth - the core would then be X% of that. Nothing in those scans say they went out to find the heaviest planet possible, whereas I have just given you a very plausible second explanation.
If I fold a piece of paper in half, and you tear it easily....to make the next one stronger, do I:
A: find a heavier piece of paper and fold it in half; or
B: fold a sheet of paper more times?
I am not taking anything away from the feat, btw. It's very impressive after all - there are very few mid-heralds who can do it on pure strength alone.
It reminded me of another mid-herald brick, Lobo, who, when not 100% either, casually throws stars around:
Throwing the core of a small planet is very impressive, though. Can't see people like Invincible doing it on pure strength, myself.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85I should have been clearer with my question - I wasn't responding to the Lobo comparison, just to this part of your post:
Oh it is. A star is more impressive than a planet, though the two magnitudes are arguably not the same.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Throwing the core of a small planet is very impressive, though. Can't see people like Invincible doing it on pure strength, myself.
I'm trying to think through why leaping-while-carrying seems more impressive than throwing and I think it's because it makes the feat seem that much easier for Hulk.