Originally posted by One Big Mob
Ownage thread, please
Spoiler:
Die. 👆
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998Ah, you're right:
justice league annual mentioned infinite multiverses too,IIRC
https://i.imgur.com/SU9PWtM.jpg
Forgot about that. 👆
Originally posted by One Big Mob
Ownage thread, please
Spoiler:
Die. 👆
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998Ah, you're right:
justice league annual mentioned infinite multiverses too,IIRC
Forgot about that. 👆
The only issue I have with other multiverses is it doesn't seem to align with what Morrison has presented and the whole 52 universe thing. Morrison didn't exactly leave an opening for other multiverses with his depiction. And nobody has tried to actually fit it in following Morrison's logic to do it.
But then again, they don't have to. Just something that will always be in the back of my mind thinking about it.
You'd think Zack-Scotty Snyder would attempt it with him trying to rip Morrison's work...
Originally posted by One Big MobHis intent was for DC to have potentially infinite multiverses:
The only issue I have with other multiverses is it doesn't seem to align with what Morrison has presented and the whole 52 universe thing. Morrison didn't exactly leave an opening for other multiverses with his depiction. And nobody has tried to actually fit it in following Morrison's logic to do it.
IGN: You had that Guidebook issue that showed the scope and makeup of the multiverse, but there were several worlds that remained a mystery. Was that you trying to leave the door open for stories like Forever Evil, or do you have more of a specific plan for those unidentified worlds?Morrison: No, I always wanted to leave a bunch of them there in case other writers wanted to come in and do something like that. I secured like 40 universes or something like that, so it only seemed fair to leave 7 or so. I also left the gateway open for the idea of a larger multiverse, which is kind of where we're going with it now. The Orrery of Worlds, as we call it - the DC Multiverse - is only one of millions, potentially infinite bubble universes. Bubble multiverses, even which is kind of consistent with current multiverse theories. It was kind of trying to tie it into all of that. The idea was to leave holes so people could fill them in. And even the bottom of the multiverse map has an empty space where Dan [Didio] asked me to leave a strange bubble, which turned out to be the Blood Moon from Convergence and Futures End. I did try to keep up to date and incorporate as much as possible. But yeah, those gaps were left for other writers.
Ah, interesting.
I was talking about potentially infinite Orrerys being undiscovered by the Prime Monitor though, and how everything would be 'cut off' if you will from other multiverses. Which you know, is easy for other writers to fit it into by creating more Orrerys, but they didn't even try to explain it, nor did Morrison seem to want it at least going by the orginal comics that introduced it.
It just seemed so finite and contained to me. Not to mention how big an event his Maps and 52/IC were. Just kind of ruins the impact for me, especially when they don't even try to fit it in using his concepts. Which they totally can, they just... haven't tried.
Wait, wasn't there a depiction of multiple Orrerys before? Plus TEH mentioning eating a prior multiverse, but that's Morrison himself doing that and thus you'd assume he'd be following his own rules.
I don't know, I just like things neat and tidy sometimes. Another Multiverse/S makes sense, it just kills me a little when they don't try to explain how it works and connect it to bigger works.
End pseudo rant/thoughts
Originally posted by Bentley
I know some people have a hard time figuring out that fictional characters can lie. You should know about it since Superman is a prime offender ("Martian Manhunter is sooo much stronger than me"😉.Here it's not even that hard to figure out, Galactus stuttered and Reed insisted in him being addled just afterwards awesr
Bravo.
Originally posted by abhilegend
And I like how you arrived on that conclusion without the comic ever implying it. [u]Addled brain =automatically lying about yourself.[U]Bravo.
ad·dled
Dictionary result for addled
/ˈadld/
adjective
adjective: addled1.
unable to think clearly; confused.
"this might just be my addled brain playing tricks
I think you might be slightly addled when it comes to comic books.
I mean, even if you were to voluntarily ignore the stuttering (which still happened, why?), Reed said Galactus was addled and that could account for him underperforming. The showing is still meh.
Maybe that thing that assumedly fueled Galactus was a planet's worth of energy and it makes perfect sense for him to be at top shape?
Originally posted by Bentley
I mean, even if you were to voluntarily ignore the stuttering (which still happened, why?), Reed said Galactus was addled and that could account for him underperforming. The showing is still meh.Maybe that thing that assumedly fueled Galactus was a planet's worth of energy and it makes perfect sense for him to be at top shape?
Yeah, Galactus can't be in top shape because "a planet's energy".
This is just hilarious.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvilhow the hell does a break in the source wall even get repaired? its not like they can call a cosmic repair man 😛
According to this comic issue, if anyone pass through the souce wall will become part of the its very fiber, but the green lantern corps have been holding the wall together with sheer will for months without falling prey to the all-consuming and impossible void beyond it.
The most disappointing thing I've ever read:
If I was writing it, that sure isn't how it would go down.
I mean, no adrenaline surge. No finger point. No body slam or legdrop of doom. Did the writer even watch wrestling?
Everyone knows in the ring, NO ONE beat Hulk Hogan. You could put PC Superman in there, Hulk WINS.