Comic Book Questions & Discussion

It was threatening 2 other realms, I forgot about that LOL

Yep, it was going to destroy hell, heaven Goku Universe and the grand Kai universe as well. Everything was going to be wiped clean.

Here’s more proof Marvel :The End is canon. This is from the Thanos sourcebook book confirming the events that led up to Thanos Imperative
https://imgur.com/gallery/atb3KiH

Aren't Alberto and carver some of the people claiming that supermans multiversal destruction feat isn't really multiversal because of collateral damage, despite the fact that a multi verse was destroyed on panel? Well boys, answer me this then: with goku's shared universal feat with beerus why was everything on earth perfectly fine despite despite the universe destroying power on display? In effect: superman destroys a multi verse on panel with collateral damage on panel, goku has a shared feat with a character that is stronger than himself that is said to be universal with no collateral damage.

Yet superman' s feat is lowballed because of collateral damage being not much compared to multiversal destruction, but goku's feat is wanked despite causing NO collateral damage.....how do you reconcile this boys? Also, granting that goku's feat is universal, why is that treated as his standard rather than an outlier? With certain posters whenever superman gets a new awesome feat it's always shrugged off as an outlier, but when one of their pet characters does...its the new standard.

Just pointing out the stupid double standards. Would it really be too much to ask for people to be objective and consistent?

@Titan

Except The person who wrote the Thanos Sourcebook had never written anything else for Marvel before that. Like I said, it's promotional fluff with no real connection to continuity.

Originally posted by emporerpants
Aren't Alberto and carver some of the people claiming that supermans multiversal destruction feat isn't really multiversal because of collateral damage, despite the fact that a multi verse was destroyed on panel? Well boys, answer me this then: with goku's shared universal feat with beerus why was everything on earth perfectly fine despite despite the universe destroying power on display? In effect: superman destroys a multi verse on panel with collateral damage on panel, goku has a shared feat with a character that is stronger than himself that is said to be universal with no collateral damage.

Yet superman' s feat is lowballed because of collateral damage being not much compared to multiversal destruction, but goku's feat is wanked despite causing NO collateral damage.....how do you reconcile this boys? Also, granting that goku's feat is universal, why is that treated as his standard rather than an outlier? With certain posters whenever superman gets a new awesome feat it's always shrugged off as an outlier, but when one of their pet characters does...its the new standard.

Just pointing out the stupid double standards. Would it really be too much to ask for people to be objective and consistent?

They won’t answer because they know of their double standards.

Originally posted by emporerpants
Aren't Alberto and carver some of the people claiming that supermans multiversal destruction feat isn't really multiversal because of collateral damage, despite the fact that a multi verse was destroyed on panel? Well boys, answer me this then: with goku's shared universal feat with beerus why was everything on earth perfectly fine despite despite the universe destroying power on display? In effect: superman destroys a multi verse on panel with collateral damage on panel, goku has a shared feat with a character that is stronger than himself that is said to be universal with no collateral damage.

Yet superman' s feat is lowballed because of collateral damage being not much compared to multiversal destruction, but goku's feat is wanked despite causing NO collateral damage.....how do you reconcile this boys? Also, granting that goku's feat is universal, why is that treated as his standard rather than an outlier? With certain posters whenever superman gets a new awesome feat it's always shrugged off as an outlier, but when one of their pet characters does...its the new standard.

Just pointing out the stupid double standards. Would it really be too much to ask for people to be objective and consistent?

They're not even remotely the same, i'm not gonna respond to this, that was flat out stupid

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
@Titan

Except The person who wrote the Thanos Sourcebook had never written anything else for Marvel before that. Like I said, it's promotional fluff with no real connection to continuity.

Also, the Thanos Sourcebook is meant to be a catalogue/entry straight from the Nova Corps Database:

So it's written from an in-universe POV, and mentions every significant event in Thanos' entire canon history... Including events from "The End":

So even the Nova Corps acknowledges that "The End" canonically happened. Why are you still trying to argue this?

Originally posted by emporerpants
Aren't Alberto and carver some of the people claiming that supermans multiversal destruction feat isn't really multiversal because of collateral damage, despite the fact that a multi verse was destroyed on panel? Well boys, answer me this then: with goku's shared universal feat with beerus why was everything on earth perfectly fine despite despite the universe destroying power on display? In effect: superman destroys a multi verse on panel with collateral damage on panel, goku has a shared feat with a character that is stronger than himself that is said to be universal with no collateral damage.

Yet superman' s feat is lowballed because of collateral damage being not much compared to multiversal destruction, but goku's feat is wanked despite causing NO collateral damage.....how do you reconcile this boys? Also, granting that goku's feat is universal, why is that treated as his standard rather than an outlier? With certain posters whenever superman gets a new awesome feat it's always shrugged off as an outlier, but when one of their pet characters does...its the new standard.

Just pointing out the stupid double standards. Would it really be too much to ask for people to be objective and consistent?

Bad post. Just terrible.

Galan I’m watching Daredevil right now I’ll give my input on those scans soon as I’m done 😎

Originally posted by carver9
Bad post. Just terrible.

Carver, you have trained your son Alberto well👆

Originally posted by carver9
Bad post. Just terrible.

No, you just hold a terrible double standard and bias.

The fact that you could write that Goku flexing his Ki would kill the League proves how much bias you holds.

That’s not bias, it’s a fact. Current Goku is angel level, universal level for him at this point is meaningless. Shaggy Man was stomping the JL, NON solo’ed the JL, I can mention a dozen of beings who wouldn’t lay waste to a universe that flat out stomped the JL

I started reading dragon ball manga in the 90s when I was a young kid. I read dbz when I was in grade school. Dragonball means way more to me than Carver ever will understand. That's why reading these ridiculous wanks makes me cringe so hard. They are actually ruining Dragonball s reputation by their antics. U know why dbz fans have the worst rep on battle boards, take a look at carver

Beerus destroyed a star with a damn sneeze, that’s pre crisis territory. Arguing that Supes even handles to let alone DBS Android 17 is laughable. This isn’t 2012 anymore

If we go low balling route Alberto, goku got shot through the heart by a lasergun

With that said current Goku is far beyond Superman and the entire Justice League.

I'd argue anything above super saiyan 3 is above normal Superman.

Sundip however is a completely different story altogether

Me and Carver were arguing that the whole time.... do you like purposely disagree with us to like piss us off? 🤣 I MEAN I DONT really care cuz I’m ALWAYS right regardless but you’re a weird lil dude.

Props though. That’s the first time you didn’t deep throat supes, keep it up 👍😎