Comic Book Questions & Discussion

Started by cdtm1,926 pages

YouTube video

I never watched the actual shows, but the movie is some good stuff.

Well, judging from the trailer, it's basically one big TTG episode.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW

Well, judging from the trailer, it's basically one big TTG episode.

I like it almost as much as 1:21-1:23 of the trailer.

😂

👆

😂

jesus

this feat is meant to be taken literal, that's crazy

Superman basically lifted the multiverse on his shoulders.

everything is such a vague term though

considering how complex dc cosmology is, I sorta blame writer for not being more specific

this is like that lifting half of inifnity in final crisis

still a insane feat, funny that marvel fans got so blown away by what donny cates did for thor

but this feat that's 10 times more impressive just got overlooked or lowballed thoroughly across forums

Writer interviews 😠

Originally posted by MrMind
jesus

this feat is meant to be taken literal, that's crazy

It may be "everything", but it was still more of a test of willpower/heartforce bullsh*t rather than strength.

Even Phil conceded that.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
It may be "everything", but it was still more of a test of willpower/heartforce bullsh*t rather than strength.

Even Phil conceded that.

the writer is sorta being a dick

the guy asked a very detailed and specific question which was for clarity

and he was just like, yeah "everything"

It's because they don't really care about answering those questions.

Sometimes they troll on purpose, sometimes they don't even remember their own script.

writers don't care about feats, nothing new

Yeah, they don't give a shit about battleboards and feats. Hell, they don't even care about continuity most of the time.

Tom Brevoort has told us that years ago and - love him or hate him - he was f*cking right.

those hardcore fans who are real anal about what's canon or not always get on my nerves though

Originally posted by MrMind
those hardcore fans who are real anal about what's canon or not always get on my nerves though

You need to establish what's actual and not to make any meaningful arguments.

Originally posted by Astner
You need to establish what's actual and not to make any meaningful arguments.

it is to a degree, but continuity will always be a mess within dc and marvel

those who have agendas, are there simply to nitpick, more than half the stories out there are not canon according to them. because there is minor conflict with previous established history, oh well the entire story is non canon then...

the classic case of fans care way more about canon than writers

Especially within DC.

Originally posted by MrMind
it is to a degree, but continuity will always be a mess within dc and marvel

Sure, but that's no reason to ignore it altogether.

Originally posted by MrMind
those who have agendas, are there simply to nitpick, more than half the stories out there are not canon according to them. because there is minor conflict with previous established history, oh well the entire story is non canon then...

As long as it is coherent that's certainly an argument that can be made.

It reminds me of a debate I had on Reddit. Where someone argued that Starlin's new books weren't canon because they referenced Marvel: The End, which according to Brevoort wasn't canon. The issue with this is that it isn't a coherent argument. Because the original Thanos run is canon and it references Marvel: The End as well.