Hancock/Thor vs Doomsday

Started by carver95 pages

Hancock/Thor vs Doomsday

Who's taking this? No bfr.

Hancock and Thor slap around Doomsday until it has absorbed enough energy to become powerful enough to kill them both.

DD was a shitty villain in a shitty film, but its power-levels are insanely high, you need K-Nite or some combatants that bring more than brick-level attacks.

Doomsday can’t hurt Thor

What version of Thor and what weapon does he have?

Originally posted by carthage
Doomsday can’t hurt Thor

? He's powerful enough to hurt/kill Superman.

Thor withstood the full force and heat of a star>> Clark died to a nuke

Thor is vastly more durable

Some think that because Thor took the star in IW that he can't be hurt by anything less than that level.

As for this match Thor better aim for the head this time.

My thoughts:

Thor and Hancock together will physically outmatch DD... problem is I don't think they have the damage output to permanently take out DD. If a win can be garnered by a simple 10 count knockout then yeah, they can win. But if we're talking about actually killing DD or fully knocking him out then I can't see how they do it unless Thor has Stormbreaker and he chops DD's head off.

Originally posted by carthage
Thor withstood the full force and heat of a star>> Clark died to a nuke

Thor is vastly more durable

A nuclear reaction is different then the force of a star.

Superman can take the force of a star, it’s questionable if Thor could could survive a nuke.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
A nuclear reaction is different then the force of a star.

Superman can take the force of a star, it’s questionable if Thor could could survive a nuke.

Actually, there's no proof that DCEU Superman can take the full force of a star.

Doomsday Eventually Wins
its energy aborsbtion abilgty is insane............

one thing is sure, they are not puting doomy down.

Originally posted by carthage
Thor withstood the full force and heat of a star>> Clark died to a nuke

Thor is vastly more durable

The nuke didn't kill Superman, it put him in some sort of weird dehydrated coma (followed the comic somewhat here) and he needed a solar recharge, while Thor seemed like he was about to die after the neutron star feat.

"I think he's dying. He needs the axe!" -Eitri the Dwarf

Originally posted by Robtard
The nuke didn't kill Superman, it put him in some sort of weird dehydrated coma (followed the comic somewhat here) and he needed a solar recharge, while Thor seemed like he was about to die after the neutron star feat.

"I think he's dying. He needs the axe!" -Eitri the Dwarf

I think it's fair to assume they both would have eventually died from those feats had it not been for an external power source (the sun and stormbreaker).

Originally posted by FrothByte
Actually, there's no proof that DCEU Superman can take the full force of a star.

Especially seeing as the full force of a star is actually so far above a nuke you might as well be comparing a cup of water to the ocean.

Are we forgetting that Superman's powers come from a star; absorbing its radiation? Kinda silly to ignore that. He could potentially have been powered up exponentially should he have done the same feat as Thor.

But it also needs to be pointed out that neutron star is a collapsed massive star, so its radiation may or may not power Superman.

The point was comparing their durability, if Superman gets powered up by something, surviving it isn't a durability feat.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Actually, there's no proof that DCEU Superman can take the full force of a star.

DNCU has always shown Superman to be amped by a yellow star. That star would amp him beyond belief. Not only could he survive it be he would be empowered by it.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
DNCU has always shown Superman to be amped by a yellow star. That star would amp him beyond belief. Not only could he survive it be he would be empowered by it.

Emphasis on yellow star. Not just any star. I'm pretty sure that neutron stars are not yellow stars. In fact if I'm not mistaken, I do think a neutron star is originally a red star.

The way Jor-El explained it for the DCCU, it seems Krypton's sun was a red dwarf or a similar "cool" star. While the emphasis was that Earth's sun was "young" and more vibrant (ie yellow star = higher/est energy output) and therefore was able to power Superman's kryptonian physiology.

Edit: Found the quote: "Earth's sun is younger and brighter than Krypton's was. Your cells have drunk in its radiation, strengthening your muscles, your skin, your senses. Earth's gravity is weaker, yet its atmosphere is more nourishing. You've grown stronger here than I ever could have imagined. The only way to know how strong, is to keep testing your limits." -Jor-El

A neutron star would probably do more damage than Thor than. Concentrated red sun weakness.