Sure it does, if the first couple stopped and the rest derailed the force created further back would be drastically reduced to Hancock.
Also Clark derailed multiple trains just by throwing Namek into them. Saying that the Kryptonins can’t reproduce the feat, or Hancocks is somehow far above theirs is pure silliness.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
https://www.quora.com/How-much-force-will-Hancock-need-to-use-to-stop-a-freight-train-dead-in-its-tracks-Or-how-much-would-an-object-have-to-weigh-to-do-the-sameNot my math but those seem to come from a pair of engineers, so I’m assuming they know what they’re saying. /shrug
Insane. And the trains all did stop at once. Broly is a troll.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Sure it does, if the first couple stopped and the rest derailed the force created further back would be drastically reduced to Hancock.Also Clark derailed multiple trains just by throwing Namek into them. Saying that the Kryptonins can’t reproduce the feat, or Hancocks is somehow far above theirs is pure silliness.
Hancock was in contact with the train for a couple of seconds. We clearly see that the train stopped moving.
That means that the train's whole inertia (moving ahead) was stopped.
The fact that the back cars derail simply means that they were forced to change their direction due to a force being applied onto them. That force is derived from Hancock's body.
No.....
A Thunderbolt II bullet was able to send Namek flying several meters and even stunned him.
A train at full speed 》》a bullet.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
A thunderbolt II is firing large depleted urnaium shells at thousands of miles per hour and shooting thousands a minute.
Still the force isn't nearly as insane as the one delivered by a train.
Even a small car moving at high speeds would deliver a greater force than a bullet.
Bullets are meant to penetrate objects not send them flying.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Hancock was in contact with the train for a couple of seconds. We clearly see that the train stopped moving.That means that the train's whole inertia (moving ahead) was stopped.
The fact that the back cars derail simply means that they were forced to change their direction due to a force being applied onto them. That force is derived from Hancock's body.
No.....
A Thunderbolt II bullet was able to send Namek flying several meters and even stunned him.
A train at full speed 》》a bullet.
There is no proof that Hancock could just shrug off those bullets as well.
I like the fact that we magically forgets that Namek jumped and hit the same jet, and crashed landed with it, survived the explosion with no sign of being hurt.
But let’s only focus on him being pushed back by bullets being fired at high volocity and comparing that to a train. A train by the way that’s not even a bullet train.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Different types of forces and projectiles. The reason why Namek moved when the salvos hit him was that they were designed to pierce at a high velocity. Since they didn't, the force turned into blunt force instead of piercing.
Still, the power exerted by a bullet will never compare to that of a train.
In fact, a bullet doesn't pack that much force.
For instance, there is this episode of Mythbusters called Science of Spin.
In that episode there is a myth called "Is it possible to start a merry-go-round spinning by shooting bullets at it from a handgun (as depicted in Shoot ‘Em Up)".
In that episode they attempt to spin a merry-go-round with several ammunitions.
In the end, they use a 50 caliber which barely moves the merry-go-round a couple of inches. Although airplane ammo is much bigger and stronger than a 50 cal, definitely it could never compare with a car xrashing an object, much less a train.
I couldn't find the video of the Mythbuster scene sadly.
Originally posted by SquallX
I like the fact that we magically forgets that Namek jumped and hit the same jet, and crashed landed with it, survived the explosion with no sign of being hurt.But let’s only focus on him being pushed back by bullets being fired at high volocity and comparing that to a train. A train by the way that’s not even a bullet train.
A train》》》 a bullet.
Hancock 》》》 Namek.
There is no much debate to be had, when the feats speak for themselves.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
And what about Clark derailing multiple trains by throwing Namek into them?
What about it? The feat isn't the same.
Hancock stopped a train without flinching or even showing signs of discomfort.
Namek was used as a canon ball against the trains. Doesn't mean he was unaffected or that he can replicate Hancock's feat.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
You don't know that much about trains derailing. Just because he stopped the first car doesn't mean he stopped the rest, hence while they piled up.
Lol. The reason they piled up was because he stopped their forward momentum. It's not like they magically derailed just because the front locomotive stopped. The overall mass of the train still includes all of them.
Clark derailed multiple trains. Hancock derailed one train.
Clark’s feat is bigger. Namek who’s arguably stronger then MOS Superman easily could replicate the feat.
He also has been shown to toss trains like toy cars.
Again back to simple physics. It’s easier to stop a 250lbs line backer then to pick up and throw a 250lbs rock.
If anyone says different go watch football, then go pick up a large rock and see if you can throw it.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Clark derailed multiple trains. Hancock derailed one train.Clark’s feat is bigger. Namek who’s arguably stronger then MOS Superman easily could replicate the feat.
He also has been shown to toss trains like toy cars.
Again back to simple physics. It’s easier to stop a 250lbs line backer then to pick up and throw a 250lbs rock.
If anyone says different go watch football, then go pick up a large rock and see if you can throw it.
Derailing trains is not what's being discussed here. Nobody cares about how many trains they derailed. What is being discussed is that Hancock completely stopped a train in its tracks. Has Namek done a similar feat?