Hancock/Mary vs Namek/Faora

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Clark derailed multiple trains. Hancock derailed one train.

Clark’s feat is bigger. Namek who’s arguably stronger then MOS Superman easily could replicate the feat.

He also has been shown to toss trains like toy cars.

Again back to simple physics. It’s easier to stop a 250lbs line backer then to pick up and throw a 250lbs rock.

If anyone says different go watch football, then go pick up a large rock and see if you can throw it.

We have a direct line of comparison by having similar feats. That nullifies any other argument derived from speculating different feats.

Both Namek and Hancock were standing still.
Both were impacted by an object moving at high speeds.

Hancock is superior to Namek. Namek was toyed by a bullet whilst Hancock laugh at a train.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
The world engine had more force than a moving train. Clark stood in it just fine.

.....No.

Clark was moving with the World Engine's beam. He wasn't going against it....

It's like saying a man can endure the entire force of a river by swimming with it's current.

Has anyone pointed out the difference between how Hancock and Superman reacted to being hit by a train?

One person didn't even move, the other was Superman.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
.....No.

Clark was moving with the World Engine's beam. He wasn't going against it....

It's like saying a man can endure the entire force of a river by swimming with it's current.

Wrong Clark was moving against it.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Wrong Clark was moving against it.

The beam was moving stuff up and down.

And even if that's the case. Swimming against the current of a river doesn't mean you are enduring the full force of it.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Wrong Clark was moving against it.

Don't ignore how Lois was right there with him and was just fine. Lois, the human reporter woman.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
The world engine had more force than a moving train. Clark stood in it just fine.

So now you're moving goalposts again? Note that Superman is not even in this thread. Namek and Faora are. Last I checked, neither of them performed the world engine feat.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Has anyone pointed out the difference between how Hancock and Superman reacted to being hit by a train?

One person didn't even move, the other was Superman.

Good point.

Originally posted by KingD19
Don't ignore how Lois was right there with him and was just fine. Lois, the human reporter woman.

Lois wasn’t in the world engine beam in India😂

Using Lois as a way to downplay Clark’s feats is ****ing stupid.

The same can be argued for any fiction humans that survives shits they shouldn’t. It’s story telling 101.

It’s the same way Natasha was able to the Hulk running after her on the carrier. Or how Ripley survived against the Aliens. So on and so on.

Hell, we can even say that’s how th husband survived having sex with Mary in the first place. After all, look what happened with Hancock and that human chick.

Originally posted by KingD19
So did LOIS LANE, a completely normal human.

The same Clark got koed by an oil rig falling on him. That wouldn't have done anything to Hancock. Wouldn't have even budged him.

Originally posted by carver9
The same Clark got koed by an oil rig falling on him. That wouldn't have done anything to Hancock. Wouldn't have even budged him.

Carver, shut up!

Originally posted by SquallX
Using Lois as a way to downplay Clark's feats is ****ing stupid.

The same can be argued for any fiction humans that survives shits they shouldn’t. It's story telling 101.

It's the same way Natasha was able to the Hulk running after her on the carrier. Or how Ripley survived against the Aliens. So on and so on.

Hell, we can even say that's how th husband survived having sex with Mary in the first place. After all, look what happened with Hancock and that human chick.

If you want to use the argument that Lois only survived because of plot armor and not durability, then everyone else is free to use the same argument for Superman.

Lois wasn’t in the world engine beam in India

clark fell from thousands of feet ontop a mountain... and got up like he just had a siesta.

Besides clark can decide to do exactly what hancock did and have the same result.

Remember this is the same supes that the combined pushing force of diana, arthur and vic using multiple thrusters didnt move one millimeter...and he wasnt even concentrating.

Be careful clark haters.

Originally posted by The Spectre+
clark fell from thousands of feet ontop a mountain... and got up like he just had a siesta.

Besides clark can decide to do exactly what hancock did and have the same result.

Remember this is the same supes that the combined pushing force of diana, arthur and vic using multiple thrusters didnt move one millimeter...and he wasnt even concentrating.

Be careful clark haters.

So Diana, Arthur and Vic can pick up a whale and toss it thousands of ft casually? Please post the scene proving this. This isn't even Hancock best. You can combine them if you want.

Namek threw a train that is heavier than a whale. What does it matter?

An adult grey whale weights 66,000lbs, a locomotive weight 430,000lbs.

Originally posted by The Spectre+
clark fell from thousands of feet ontop a mountain... and got up like he just had a siesta.

Besides clark can decide to do exactly what hancock did and have the same result.

Remember this is the same supes that the combined pushing force of diana, arthur and vic using multiple thrusters didnt move one millimeter...and he wasnt even concentrating.

Be careful clark haters.

As I always say, feats are all that matters.

We have a direct comparison between Hancock and Namek.

Hancock is by far superior.

No hate my fellow.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Namek threw a train that is heavier than a whale. What does it matter?

An adult grey whale weights 66,000lbs, a locomotive weight 430,000lbs.

Hancock stopped one without even feeling a scratch.

Hancock is superior.

No it’s not