Greater feat: Thor pulling the rings vs. Superman Pulling a ship

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, are you retarded? if Thor wasn't strong enough to withstand the force being applied the cable would have been ripped out of his hands. so your sad attempt to downplay the feat has failed.

Two things.
1. Grip strength and pulling strength are two different things as someone's grip strength >>> their pulling strength.

2. Thor's grip strength is more than that of metal.
I agree. But Superman pulling that ship took more force than breaking metal.

So you can quantify the metal breaking part yes?
What would be a lower estimate?

Also that part has nothing to do with thr ice breaking part (freeing the rings) which is what the thread is about. Let's not use different feats other than that of the OP.

Only Thor's hands weren't locked straight, that means he was pulling against the force and not just using grip strength. your sad attempt to downplay the feat has once again failed.

That is a claim, So prove that Superman feat took more force than Thor tearing through all that metal.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Only Thor's hands weren't locked straight, that means he was pulling against the force and not just using grip strength. your sad attempt to downplay the feat has once again failed.

That is a claim, So prove that Superman feat took more force than Thor tearing through all that metal.

All that metal is irrelevant. If you are pulled with a force for a mile, breaking a mile length of a wooden floor, then you only braced against the force required to break the wood floor (but for a long time).

Here's another example, if I pulled you with a rope and your feet broke 1 in of wood then pulling you a longer distance, with the same force, will cause you to break more wood.

And again, that scene isn't the ring freeing scene and has nothing to do with the thread.

Only Thor's hands weren't locked straight, that means he was pulling against the force and not just using grip strength to hold on. your sad attempt to downplay the feat has once again failed.

That is a claim, So prove that Superman's feat took more force than Thor tearing through all that metal.

Again, that is the ring freeing scene. either you're lying or too stupid to know what you're talking about, which is it?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Only Thor's hands weren't locked straight, that means he was pulling against the force and not just using grip strength to hold on. your sad attempt to downplay the feat has once again failed.

That is a claim, So prove that Superman's feat took more force than Thor tearing through all that metal.

Again, that is the ring freeing scene. either you're lying or too stupid to know what you're talking about, which is it?

Idiot. It doesn't matter if your arms are straight or not, Thor was being pulled and not the other way around. Otherwise people who waterski are pulling the boat vs them being pulled by the boat.

Originally posted by h1a8
Two things.
1. Grip strength and pulling strength are two different things as someone's grip strength >>> their pulling strength.

2. Thor's grip strength is more than that of metal.
I agree. But Superman pulling that ship took more force than breaking metal.

So you can quantify the metal breaking part yes?
What would be a lower estimate?

Also that part has nothing to do with thr ice breaking part (freeing the rings) which is what the thread is about. Let's not use different feats other than that of the OP.

I'm not sure I know what you mean.

Originally posted by h1a8
Idiot. It doesn't matter if your arms are straight or not, Thor was being pulled and not the other way around. Otherwise people who waterski are pulling the boat vs them being pulled by the boat.

Just how dumb are you? If Thor was relying on just grip strength to hold on his arms would be locked straight and pointed towards the ship. they weren't. which means he wasn't just holding the rope, he was pulling against it. IOW, your grip strength only argument is sh!t.

Originally posted by h1a8
Two things.
1. Grip strength and pulling strength are two different things as someone's grip strength >>> their pulling strength.

2. Thor's grip strength is more than that of metal.
I agree. But Superman pulling that ship took more force than breaking metal.

So you can quantify the metal breaking part yes?
What would be a lower estimate?

Also that part has nothing to do with thr ice breaking part (freeing the rings) which is what the thread is about. Let's not use different feats other than that of the OP.

Grip is the weakest part of any lift. So if you can keep your grip and complete the lift or pull or whatever, means your a boss.

For all the time i've been in this forum, the only thing SM and H1 have ever agreed on is to disagree. 😂

Originally posted by Darth Thor
h1 isnt Josh Lmao

H1 is Joshie’s sock account. The similarities are uncanny; same feelings based type of arguments. Same shit posting.

H1 is hillbilly inbred piece of turd that deserves to be mocked into oblivion. How do you people take him seriously?

H1 has been here for like 10 years or more, Josh only a few, they don't have any similarities.

H1 is a die hard DC fan, Josh is a diehard marvel fan

You are way off

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
H1 has been here for like 10 years or more, Josh only a few, they don't have any similarities.

H1 is a die hard DC fan, Josh is a diehard marvel fan

You are way off

You’re way off. Can’t you see a ruse when it’s right in front of you? He only wants you to believe that, what with his trollish statements and hyperbole arguments. They’re the same fatass loser idiot: Josh = H1.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just how dumb are you? If Thor was relying on just grip strength to hold on his arms would be locked straight and pointed towards the ship. they weren't. which means he wasn't just holding the rope, he was pulling against it. IOW, your grip strength only argument is sh!t.

Nonsense, Thor could probably crush an entire sun with his grip.

Originally posted by Eon Blue
You’re way off. Can’t you see a ruse when it’s right in front of you? He only wants you to believe that, what with his trollish statements and hyperbole arguments. They’re the same fatass loser idiot: Josh = H1.

LOOL

Im willing to change my opinion but give me some more evidence.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
LOOL

Im willing to change my opinion but give me some more evidence.

That’s a start. You’re on the right path. I would provide further details, but let’s just watch this play out. Pay very close attention to both of them from here on out.

H1 is a pitiful hoebag.

HAHAHAHAHA

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
HAHAHAHAHA

Josh has made claims that Eon and Quan are the same person

I talked to Quan, Quan told me Eon is just someone that is trolling him by making people think its quans sock.

The plot thickens.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
H1 has been here for like 10 years or more, Josh only a few, they don't have any similarities.

H1 is a die hard DC fan, Josh is a diehard marvel fan

You are way off

Eon is just butthurt because he thought he could go arround licking Quan's ass, without nobody realizing he is trully nothing but his sock.

He is just looking for retribution, don't waste your time. He ain't to be taken serious.