Greater feat: Thor pulling the rings vs. Superman Pulling a ship

In your opinion and based on the effort exerted. Which feat required more strength to exert?

Clark towing a ship through ice in BVS

Vs

Thor pulling the Forge rings in Infinity war

Thor is apparently more impressing.

But we've got to consider that the rings weight isn't that apparent. The gravity isn't the same as they are on space.

So, I don't really know how strong that feat is.

My bets are on Thor though.

Objects don't weigh anything in space.

Having to break the massive amount of ice and stuff weighs something though. And holding open the iris while being pelted with millions s of tons of force (maybe more) from a star is way past anything Supes did on screen

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Having to break the massive amount of ice and stuff weighs something though. And holding open the iris while being pelted with millions s of tons of force (maybe more) from a star is way past anything Supes did on screen

The ice is a strength feat yes.

We don't really know what type of beam that one was.

Could have been just heat or radiation, which would weight nothing. I don't think it was matter.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Having to break the massive amount of ice and stuff weighs something though. And holding open the iris while being pelted with millions s of tons of force (maybe more) from a star is way past anything Supes did on screen

Everything is space is weightless.

Thor's feat and it's not even close.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Thor's feat and it's not even close.

Superman pulling the the ship wasn't impressive at all as that was fan service...

thor pulling the rings was far more impressive

lol at all those people overplaying thor's massively unquantifiable feat(feats that are filled with lots of question marks) and ignoring real life physics. Meanwhile those same guys apply real life physics to downplay supes....
Double Standard.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Thor is apparently more impressing.

But we've got to consider that the rings weight isn't that apparent. The gravity isn't the same as they are on space.

So, I don't really know how strong that feat is.

My bets are on Thor though.

So you admit you dont even know the physics in space and what is going on, but your saying its a better feat while downplaying a quantifiable feat like pulling a ocean friggate on its side through the ice.

How the Thor feat quantifiable to you when you dont even know how big the rings were, how thick the ice was on them

Also didnt Rocket Help Thor a lot in that feat? Thor Swung the ship around and Rocket had the ship on full power.

Nobody is over-playing Thor's feat.

^^ then how quantifiable is/are thor's feats?
(compared to supes)

I'm not getting it either, why is Supermans feat not quantifiable, but Thors is. Also wasn't Thors feat assisted by Rocket and his ship?

It helped in the sense that it gave Thor someone to pull against, if Thor wasn't strong enough the cable would have been ripped from his hands.

Yea he was definitely strong enough to do it, no denying that. Its just that feat is now "quantifiable" yet people been saying for years that Superman's world engine feat wasn't or isn't.

Its even stated in MoS that the World Engine was a gravity weapon, Thors feat took place in space with no gravity. So I don't know why Thors is all the sudden quantifiable but Supermans isnt and never will be.

Most higher end feats aren't quantifiable in the sense that we can go. it took exactly xxxx.xxx tons to perform the feat.

But we can use common sense, I mean you'd have to be massively biased to think towing a ship is anywhere close to moving rings that are big enough to encircle a neutron star. keep in mind that neutron stars have a diamater of 20km.

Can anyone quantify Thor's feat?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Thor is apparently more impressing.

But we've got to consider that the rings weight isn't that apparent. The gravity isn't the same as they are on space.

So, I don't really know how strong that feat is.

My bets are on Thor though.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Objects don't weigh anything in space.

The rings also had their own gravity, so what you're saying isn't strictly correct either.

Originally posted by Nevan
Objects in space have mass, said mass takes force to accelerate, ergo Thor had to apply that force.

The rings also had their own gravity, so what you're saying isn't strictly correct either.

Moving objects underwater is fairly easier than on land. Although it still requires force, it ain't the same.

The rings had it's own internal gravity it seems. Not like there was gravity outside.