They'll see that you claim that we should use averages, yet you will always bring up the high-end feats for a character you want to win while at the same time saying high-end feats for the other side don't count because they're outliers.
Thank you for proving to the entire board that you're a massive hypocrite.
Originally posted by Silent Master
They'll see that you claim that we should use averages, yet you will always bring up the high-end feats for a character you want to win while at the same time saying high-end feats for the other side don't count because they're outliers.Thank you for proving to the entire board that you're a massive hypocrite.
No one use averages here. Everyone (including you) uses high end showings, including outliers. Therefore, it will be stupid for me to not use them.
So since this thread has no consensus then we will continue to use high-end showings as a character's power level. Unless someone wants argue otherwise.
Originally posted by h1a8
No one use averages here. Everyone (including you) uses high end showings, including outliers. Therefore, it will be stupid for me to not use them.So since this thread has no consensus then we will continue to use high-end showings as a character's power level. Unless someone wants argue otherwise.
You didn't address my post in the first page.
Do you think a character showing the slightest hint of moving at above normal speed, should mean that they move around the battlefield like the flash and everyone is a statue to them in all their fights?
Even though non of that is shown, but is assumed based on the character having a single moment that they seemed to move with enhanced speed.
Originally posted by Inhuman
You didn't address my post in the first page.
Do you think a character showing the slightest hint of moving at above normal speed, should mean that they move around the battlefield like the flash and everyone is a statue to them in all their fights?
Even though non of that is shown, but is assumed based on the character having a single moment that they seemed to move with enhanced speed.
That's what this thread is about. Should a character always operate at their highest showings in a forum fight?
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Yes, if a character performed a feat, there is no reason to believe he couldn't replicate it.
Way to ignore the actual point or twist the words where it doesn't sound as bad.
Will a character perform to that level at all times or always operate at that level in a forum fight?
That's the question.
It's a simple yes or no and a rephrasing of the question.
Originally posted by h1a8
Way to ignore the actual point or twist the words where it doesn't sound as bad.Will a character perform to that level at all times or always operate at that level in a forum fight?
That's the question.It's a simple yes or no and a rephrasing of the question.
If I can lift a 10kg weight today with little effort, is there any reason to believe I couldn't do the same tomorrow?
Unless there is movie evidence, under similar conditions a character should be able to replicate the feat.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
If I can lift a 10kg weight today with little effort, is there any reason to believe I couldn't do the same tomorrow?Unless there is movie evidence, under similar conditions a character should be able to replicate the feat.
Ok so you won't answer yes or no but rather explain irrelevant shit.
Why be so dense?
Fictional characters aren't real. They operate at different levels in different scenes. In one scene they can effortlessly lift a million tons and in other they struggle to lift 50 tons (or fail to overpower someone who can't lift above 100 tons). If you didn't know inconsistency and contradicts don't happen in fiction then something is wrong with you and you shouldn't be part of the discussion.
And you keep referring to replicating a feat. This is a forum fight not a feat to achieve. In a forum fight, will the character operate ALWAYS at the highest showings they achieved? Simple yes or no. You don't have to explain why or why not.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, you call Hela's feat an outlier while at the same time use Ozy's bullet feat.You're a hypocrite and the entire board knows it.
Calling Hela's feat an outlier =/= calling the feat not usable.
That's for us to decide as a whole (like a vote), or in a mod ruling.
Another stupid post by you.
Originally posted by h1a8
Ok so you won't answer yes or no but rather explain irrelevant shit.
Why be so dense?Fictional characters aren't real. They operate at different levels in different scenes. In one scene they can effortlessly lift a million tons and in other they struggle to lift 50 tons (or fail to overpower someone who can't lift above 100 tons). If you didn't know inconsistency and contradicts don't happen in fiction then something is wrong with you and you shouldn't be part of the discussion.
And you keep referring to replicating a feat. This is a forum fight not a feat to achieve. In a forum fight, will the character operate ALWAYS at the highest showings they achieved? Simple yes or no. You don't have to explain why or why not.
Are you even READING what I am saying H1!?
You are asking whether a person will ALWAYS operate under his greatest showing, aren't you!?
My response to your question:
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Yes, if a character performed a feat, there is no reason to believe he couldn't replicate it.
In case your reading comprenhension is failing, what am saying is, a character will be able to operate at his greatest showing UNLESS there is canon material to retcon it.
In a fight, a character won't necessarily operate at his highest power however(Like if the character doesn't feel the need do so), but will certainly be able to do so, should the need arise.
That is ofcourse, as long as his greatest feat remains canon.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Are you even READING what I am saying H1!?You are asking whether a person will ALWAYS operate under his greatest showing, aren't you!?
My response to your question:
In case your reading comprenhension is failing, what am saying is, a character will be able to operate at his greatest showing UNLESS there is canon material to retcon it.
In a fight, a character won't necessarily operate at his highest power however(Like if the character doesn't feel the need do so), but will certainly be able to do so, should the need arise.
That is ofcourse, as long as his greatest feat remains canon.
I have no clue to what you are talking about. You are making things complicated. Why not just answer yes or no and then explain why or why not?
Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, you ignore the main point. you call Hela's feat an outlier while at the same time use Ozy's bullet feat.You're a hypocrite and the entire board knows it.
Calling Hela's feat an outlier =/= calling the feat not usable. There isn't anything hypocritical about it. If I stated that her feat is unusable (I'm not a mod) and then say that another outlier is usable then you have a point. But at the moment, everyone, including me and you, agrees that all outliers are usable.
Another stupid post by you.
Originally posted by h1a8
Calling Hela's feat an outlier =/= calling the feat not usable. There isn't anything hypocritical about it. If I stated that her feat is unusable (I'm not a mod) and then say that another outlier is usable then you have a point. But at the moment, everyone, including me and you, agrees that all outliers are usable.Another stupid post by you.
Again, you are missing the point. here, I'll try and dumb this down enough for you.
h1: Hela only performed the feat once, that means it's an outlier.
h1: Ozy only performed the feat once, that means it's not an outlier.
Everyone else: h1 is a hypocrite.