Catholic Kids get blamed for something they didnt do

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
sorry, i just want to know why spouting vile shit loudly at people is a right if you're a pack of 300 of neo-nazis, but not if you're a small pack of neo...black...nazis?

This is very similar to when someone criticizes Trump, and a hard-core supporter goes "But emails!".

This is a fallacious statement, that has no bearing on this discussion from the posts I've read on this thread.

Everyone has the right to march, and peacefully protest. The Black Israelites were not peaceful, were antognizing etc. If Neo-Nazi's did the same, they'd be assholes too. Neo-Nazi's are almost by definition d*cks so that goes without saying. Black Israelites seem to be in the same vein.

Don't trust the lam stream media (including fox) kids, is the moral of the story.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
This is very similar to when someone criticizes Trump, and a hard-core supporter goes "But emails!".

This is a fallacious statement, that has no bearing on this discussion from the posts I've read on this thread.

Everyone has the right to march, and peacefully protest. The Black Israelites were not peaceful, were antognizing etc. If Neo-Nazi's did the same, they'd be assholes too. Neo-Nazi's are almost by definition d*cks so that goes without saying. Black Israelites seem to be in the same vein.

Oh look, you took the context of the argument away from the same people who defended neo fascists, including in charlottesville. You're a solid bro 👆

What was the intended message of your reply to me? I am trying to handstand your POV and not come to conclusions about your intelligence. If you’re asking my opinion on the Neo-Nazi’s in Charlottesville, it’s negative. Nor do I agree with people defending vehicular homicide in any manner. I am not sure what that has to do with my main point.

That your post was fallacious, and there was no critical reasoning behind the message you were trying to convey. If you want to reply to a specific poster, quoting a specific post he made, and call him a hypocrite, that’s fine. But that is still fallacious as you’re not making a point that stands on its own imo.

Double post

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
sorry, i just want to know why spouting vile shit loudly at people is a right if you're a pack of 300 of neo-nazis, but not if you're a small pack of neo...black...nazis?

I agree that spouting vile shit is not a right (edit. Well technically, it IS a right if it is within the coverage of the first amendment, but ppl would be right to condemn you for it). But I watched the video and I would like to know what specific part of it you consider to be “spouting vile shit” just so I can get what your reasoning is.

Bashy and Reason Don't Mix!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by Robtard
That's as easy as farting to answer: Smirking at someone's culture and heritage, hands down.

If you get triggered by some NA cultural drumming and chanting, you're probably mental.

If you get triggered by a smiling kid in a maga hat you're mentally ill 👆

So what's I guess another thing that's cultural? So you have rap right? So say a black guy randomly approaches you, walks up to you, and gets within inches of your face and just starts rapping right next to your face.

So you and the people with you start laughing and making imitating, smirking, and laughing at the guy.

Is that a mockery of black people, or is that a "what the **** is this guy doing right now?"

Like that's a different situation than just mocking someone just randomly in their own business doing some native american singing drumming stuff.

If a Christian walked up to a group of high school students, getting all up in their face and started singing songs from a catholic mass and talking about Jesus and the people there were laughing and smirking at the guy, I wouldn't assume they're shitting on all Christians, but more like "wtf is this guy doing right now?"

They have no argument, so they're just making up reasons why the kids are the bad guys. even if the kids were mocking their harassers, mocking someone that is harassing you doesn't make you worse than the harasser.

Originally posted by Silent Master
They have no argument, so they're just making up reasons why the kids are the bad guys. even if the kids were mocking their harassers, mocking someone that is harassing you doesn't make you worse than the harasser.

It gets worse: once the initial narrative was shattered some people began desperately searching for anything negative about this school they could latch onto.

For example, apparently within the last decade one student from the school was found guilty of rape. I'm not sure why this is relevant information, but they dug it up anyways.

They also attacked the kid for having a PR firm put out a statement, but never once attacked the Parkland students who do the same(and who also have private security). David Hogg gets threatened and it's justified, conservative kids get threatened and using a PR firm is suddenly an example of white privilege.

They don't seem to realize they could have said "yeah, we f*cked up...we were wrong" without it meaning they think the teens are all innocent angels.

Well well well:

Nathan Phillips Led Protest Attempting To Crash Mass After Covington Catholic Confrontation

Originally posted by Nibedicus
I agree that spouting vile shit is not a right (edit. Well technically, it IS a right if it is within the coverage of the first amendment, but ppl would be right to condemn you for it). But I watched the video and I would like to know what specific part of it you consider to be “spouting vile shit” just so I can get what your reasoning is.

or you can just point out the part of the video where they turn 'violent'

I'm wondering why the black racists haven't been doxxed by the left? Anyone care to guess why? There is plenty of video of them. Someone hazard a guess why...

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
or you can just point out the part of the video where they turn 'violent'

What violence do you mean?

I hope this isn't some "words are violence" type nonsense.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
What violence do you mean?

let me rephrase: at which point in the video do you feel that the isrealites crossed the line and forfeited their first ammendment right? link and timestamp please. Maybe I blinked or sneezed and missed some vital evidence

Originally posted by Nibedicus
What violence do you mean?

You'll notice that he can't answer your question so he's trying to deflect by asking you to back up argument you've never made.

I've deflected nothing, you boring time waster. So far literally everyone has deflected my initial point, so bark more