So much for Alex Jones

Alex Jones must pay $4M in damages to Sandy Hook family

"reeeeeeee" 😂

Surely he can afford $4m

That's a lot of Brain Force Plus.

Originally posted by Robtard
I'd forgotten about Alex Jones' child porn allegations. What did he claim, that someone else put the child porn on his computer and search history?

He claimed the images were on the InfoWars server, because someone emailed them to him to plant them there, but that he never opened the emails.

However, evidence suggests that the images were on the server, because he emailed them to himself.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Alex Jones must pay $4M in damages to Sandy Hook family

"reeeeeeee" 😂

That figure is for only two of the families. There are like a dozen families in the suit.

While driving I heard on the radio Jones could face an additional 45 million to those two families 🙂

Jones has bragged before that his Infowars (and connected entities) are worth over 250 million, so keep rewarding jurors.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/aug/05/alex-jones-punitive-damages-sandy-hook-family?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/aug/05/alex-jones-punitive-damages-sandy-hook-family?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

"REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
Now it's 50 millionlaughcry

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
"REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
Now it's 50 millionlaughcry

Man, what an a##hole he is. It's pretty refreshing having him get what he had coming.

Also kind of hilarious the way it went down. Something about his lawyers sending all his texts to the opposing attorneys? Gold.

Jones testified that just 2 million would bankrupt him/his companies, the economist/financial expert that testified said he was worth at least 270 million and that he’s shuffled over 60 million between various shell companies.

Hopefully every family is awarded around 50 million and Jones is legit left with nothing.

Isn't it law that the defense must have prior knowledge of all evidence that the prosecutor or plaintiff plans to use against them? could it be argued that the plaintiffs' lawyers were obligated to immediately disclose the text message error?

Dunno, but I think you’re talking about “Brady material”, and since the defense already had the text messages, it would likely not go against the prosecution here.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Isn't it law that the defense must have prior knowledge of all evidence that the prosecutor or plaintiff plans to use against them? could it be argued that the plaintiffs' lawyers were obligated to immediately disclose the text message error?

Why would the plaintiffs need to disclose when the defense supplied the evidence? If they did not know, they should have.

because they used those texts as evidence. in doing so, it could be argued that they should have notified the defense "we got ALL the messages, thank you very much, and we intend to use it.

Originally posted by Robtard
Dunno, but I think you’re talking about “Brady material”, and since the defense already had the text messages, it would likely not go against the prosecution here.

Yeah, pretty sure that's what i was thinking about

double post

Alex Jones is hitting his sales pitch harder than ever, begging his degenerate fans to buy his shitty products.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
because they used those texts as evidence. in doing so, it could be argued that they should have notified the defense "we got ALL the messages, thank you very much, and we intend to use it.

His counsel has a duty to know the contents of the records before submitting them as evidence. They had every opportunity to do so. If they did not, that is a them-problem.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
His counsel has a duty to know the contents of the records before submitting them as evidence. They had every opportunity to do so. If they did not, that is a them-problem.

Are you speking lawyerese?

jones could probably win some money back if he sues his lawyers