https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/you-may-be-disappointed-mueller-report-n971601
NBC: you may be disappointed by the Muller investigation
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/you-may-be-disappointed-mueller-report-n971601NBC: you may be disappointed by the Muller investigation
This is why Dems are gonna bring their own investigations lol. It's so transparent. They will ride this until 2020.
Originally posted by Surtur
Can you explain why he shouldn't be shitted on?
Yes: He's done nothing thus far to warrant it. He was hired for a job and he's seemingly doing it.
Can you explain why he should be shit on? Since you've been doing it since about three weeks after he was appointed when the anti-Mueller campaign started.
Originally posted by Robtard
Can you explain why he should be shit on? Since you've been doing it since about three weeks after he was appointed when the anti-Mueller campaign started.
For the same reason the usual suspects are suddenly preoccupied with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: they get their marching orders from right-wing media. They are being manipulated by conservative millionaires and billionaires who own media companies, many of whom are not even Americans, and they happily march over the cliff.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
do you even watch crime dramas, bro? the reason manafort was convicted was because he cracked or was cracked by damning evidence.so all you have to hope for at this point is that he does his time without snitching, like a good caporegime.
Yes, but he was convicted of financial crimes. Nothing in any indictment says anything about collusion, coordination or conspiracy.
Are you trying to suggest, that at the end of this investigation Mueller is going to pull out fresh indictments after he's already been sentenced and in jail?
That just isn't how the law is practiced. I was on a grand jury as a foreman for 10 weeks. After we passed true bills, we never came back and passed more for people who had already been indicted and sentenced in court.
Originally posted by Robtard
Yes: He's done nothing thus far to warrant it. He was hired for a job and he's seemingly doing it.Can you explain why he should be shit on? Since you've been doing it since about three weeks after he was appointed when the anti-Mueller campaign started.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbvWlzzIFl8
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...and-uranium-one
Campbell tells me his FBI handlers assured him they had briefed Obama and then-FBI Director Robert Mueller, now the Russia special prosecutor, on Rosatom’s criminal activities as part of the president's daily briefing and that agents suggested to him that “politics” was the reason the sale was allowed to go through.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
For the same reason the usual suspects are suddenly preoccupied with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: they get their marching orders from right-wing media. They are being manipulated by conservative millionaires and billionaires who own media companies, many of whom are not even Americans, and they happily march over the cliff.
Pretty much.
Surt should be allowed to explain himself though regardless. So waiting.
"I know the Republicans have some unease about it no matter what they say, because if the president can declare an emergency on something that he has created as an emergency, an illusion that he wants to convey, just think of what a president with different values can present to the American people.
You want to talk about a national emergency? Let’s talk about today, the one-year anniversary of another manifestation of the epidemic of gun violence in America. That’s a national emergency. Why don’t you declare that emergency, Mr. President? I wish you would.
But a Democratic president can do that. Democratic president can declare emergencies as well. So, the precedent that the president is setting here is something that should be met with great unease and dismay by the Republicans."
That is one of the key reasons why the Republican Party is split over him doing this. He's doing it to save face, imo, knowing nothing much will come out.
But the precedent has been set, now they have to deal with the possibility of a Democrat President declaring a national emergency on something like gun violence as a means to get around or partially around the 2nd Amendment. If that happens, I don't want to see any tears from Trumpers, you set the field.
Originally posted by Robtard
That is one of the key reasons why the Republican Party is split over him doing this. He's doing it to save face, imo, knowing nothing much will come out.But the precedent has been set, now they have to deal with the possibility of a Democrat President declaring a national emergency on something like gun violence as a means to get around or partially around the 2nd Amendment. If that happens, I don't want to see any tears from Trumpers, you set the field.
Wow. That's a good point. I can smell a civil war.
A war that Republicans and Democrats will lose because the Libertarians are the most well-armed, intelligent, and prepared for doomsday scenarios like this.
Unfortunately, these same libertarians have more in common with Republicans.
You're welcome to stay at my Mom's house, Robtard. When the Dems start getting executed. We can hide you in her barn. It's 2 stories. Air Conditioned. When the GOP Police come over, we will put you in the tornado shelter. Just don't make a sound. While they drink their milk and interrogate us.