The National Emergency

Started by Robtard10 pages

Originally posted by dadudemon
Wow. That's a good point. I can smell a civil war.

A war that Republicans and Democrats will lose because the Libertarians are the most well-armed, intelligent, and prepared for doomsday scenarios like this.

Unfortunately, these same libertarians have more in common with Republicans.

You're welcome to stay at my Mom's house, Robtard. When the Dems start getting executed. We can hide you in her barn. It's 2 stories. Air Conditioned. When the GOP Police come over, we will put you in the tornado shelter. Just don't make a sound. While they drink their milk and interrogate us.

I don't think a Dem President would declare a national emergency to strip away gun rights, just that a precedent has been set now by the Trump admin for future admins.

There wouldn't be a civil war though, there would be a lot of tears and gripping, but the vast majority of gun owners would submit their weapons. Sure there would be scenarios here and there of people resisting and violence breaking out from those criminals.

And of course, gangs would still find a way.

Imports, CIA purchases. Maybe a 3d printer.

Originally posted by Robtard
I don't think a Dem President would declare a national emergency to strip away gun rights, just that a precedent has been set now by the Trump admin for future admins.

There wouldn't be a civil war though, there would be a lot of tears and gripping, but the vast majority of gun owners would submit their weapons. Sure there would be scenarios here and there of people resisting and violence breaking out from those criminals.

I disagree on both accounts.

I think a Dem president would declare the revocation of gun rights. Here's why:

If enough of the Americans who are butthurt about Trump vote, then a Dem president similar to Trump would get elected. Because it would be the direct Yin to Trump's Yang (insert Mushroom Wang pun, here).

There's actual partisan violence, already, happening. People are more polarized than ever according to actual research. We are in a similar "hot" position for a Civil War: II.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I disagree on both accounts.

I think a Dem president would declare the revocation of gun rights. Here's why:

If enough of the Americans who are butthurt about Trump vote, then a Dem president similar to Trump would get elected. Because it would be the direct Yin to Trump's Yang (insert Mushroom Wang pun, here).

There's actual partisan violence, already, happening. People are more polarized than ever according to actual research. We are in a similar "hot" position for a Civil War: II.

Do you really think the support is there, even among Dems?

Changing the constitution is a big deal. If nothing elss, the fear of losing something they care about, should motivate a position AGAINST changing the status quo.

Originally posted by cdtm
Do you really think the support is there, even among Dems?

No. Not unless the Yin version of Trump, from the dems, suddenly appears to rally the anti-Trumpers and Dems.

I think Trump will win another 4 years.

Originally posted by cdtm
Changing the constitution is a big deal. If nothing elss, the fear of losing something they care about, should motivate a position AGAINST changing the status quo.

This is about declaring a national emergency due to gun violence which might cause another civil war. It's a hypothetical.

Real talk:

Do you think Trump is more trouble then he's worth at this point?

E.g., would it bother you to see him impeached, if they can find a reason?

Originally posted by dadudemon
I disagree on both accounts.

I think a Dem president would declare the revocation of gun rights. Here's why:

If enough of the Americans who are butthurt about Trump vote, then a Dem president similar to Trump would get elected. Because it would be the direct Yin to Trump's Yang (insert Mushroom Wang pun, here).

There's actual partisan violence, already, happening. People are more polarized than ever according to actual research. We are in a similar "hot" position for a Civil War: II.

Honestly, I heard very similar back in 2008 and again (but not as hard) in 2012 after Obama won and showed the true markings of a President by winning again, that a civil war was coming and a race war for that matter.

So I take all that with a grain of salt, so to speak.

Originally posted by cdtm
Real talk:

Do you think Trump is more trouble then he's worth at this point?

E.g., would it bother you to see him impeached, if they can find a reason?

I've posted many times about wanting Trump removed. Impeachment is the start. I actually want him removed.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I've posted many times about wanting Trump removed. Impeachment is the start. I actually want him removed.

Which is funny, as the Trumpers here don't really give you flack for it, while they'll get up in arms over very much less from others. Begs the question, just how good is the D that you're giving them 😛

Originally posted by Robtard
Honestly, I heard very similar back in 2008 and again (but not as hard) in 2012 after Obama won and showed the true markings of a President by winning again, that a civil war was coming and a race war for that matter.

I was alive, then, too, but did not hear it even remotely as often as I do, now. And the civil unrest and literal violence between the two sides is proof that it has gotten worse (disregarding the research that shows it has gotten worse).

Originally posted by Robtard
So I take all that with a grain of salt, so to speak.

The worst possible outcome is the Democratic version of Trump is elected in 2020. At least for maintaining peace.

Best outcome is a moderate or liberal Republican beats Trump in 2020 but that's probably the second most improbable outcome.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I've posted many times about wanting Trump removed. Impeachment is the start. I actually want him removed.

Agreed.

The best thing the Republican party can do, is stop supporting the bastard.
Lynch him from the party. Make this one thing a non partisan issue.

Originally posted by cdtm
Agreed.

The best thing the Republican party can do, is stop supporting the bastard.
Lynch him from the party. Make this one thing a non partisan issue.

It'd be great if a great GOP leader held a press conference and talked about rallying enough GOP congressman, secretly, that they now have 2/3 ready to go. 🙂

The wall should have dispensers offering tortilla chips and salsa.

Originally posted by BackFire
The wall should have dispensers offering tortilla chips and salsa.

Build it out of immigrants.

If the flood is so bad, there should be enough.

This will never happen cuz Trump already screwed himself over with his words lol. It's already over. He made a comment about how he "didn't need to do this". ACLU and others are already preparing lawsuits and that one sentence will sink him.

"No, the goal of a national emergency is for Trump to scam the stupidest people in his base for 2 more years." -Ann Coulter 2/15/19

"The goal is to get Trump's stupidest voters to say "HE'S FIGHTING!" No he's not. If he signs this bill, it's over." -Ann Coulter 2/15/19

"The Only National Emergency Is That Our President Is An Idiot" -Ann Coulter

LOLz, Ann agrees with me, she's nailing Trumpers to the fence. I love it when Trumpers eat each other.

Originally posted by Robtard
"No, the goal of a national emergency is for Trump to scam the stupidest people in his base for 2 more years." -Ann Coulter 2/15/19

"The goal is to get Trump's stupidest voters to say "HE'S FIGHTING!" No he's not. If he signs this bill, it's over." -Ann Coulter 2/15/19

"The Only National Emergency Is That Our President Is An Idiot" -Ann Coulter

LOLz, Ann agrees with me, she's nailing Trumpers to the fence. I love it when Trumpers eat each other.

Pretty much proves Ann's smarter then she lets on.

Ann has been going after him over the wall literally every day lol. She keeps daily updates on how much of the wall has been built.

Originally posted by cdtm
Pretty much proves Ann's smarter then she lets on.

I never took her as being stupid, she's not, she's just vile.

Though I've said for years I don't really think she buys the hate-mongering she spews, she just knows there's a certain amount of the US population that are that way and will make her rich for being the voice of it. Still makes her garbage though.

But she nailed it right here:

"The goal is to get Trump's stupidest voters to say "HE'S FIGHTING!" No he's not. If he signs this bill, it's over." -Ann Coulter

Case in point:

Originally posted by Surtur
Didn't he try though? Can you deny that?

Comedy writes itself.

He did try, whether Ann likes it or not lol.

I don't even want a wall unless it can be shown to work and I can still acknowledge that.