Now this is going into other things. The "straining" involved in the thread seemed to be a relatively short period of time. And the whole scene in general including the "nn" seemed to be a momentary exercise anyway.
So to get a clearer picture...
Were u straining throughout the entirety of the exam or at one or two things? If it was only at certain parts, were these parts an extensive portion of the exam?
Moreover.....he had ZERO effort in lifting 200quintillion tons.
He exerted some effort to break the machine. Was it rated for 201 quintillion tons? 200.0000001 quintillion tons? 2,000 quintillion tons? 2 billion quintillion trillion googleplex tons? We don't know.
But 200 quintillion? Ain't nothing but a thing. With one hand.
Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Now this is going into other things. The "straining" involved in the thread seemed to be a relatively short period of time. And the whole scene in general including the "nn" seemed to be a momentary exercise anyway.So to get a clearer picture...
Were u straining throughout the entirety of the exam or at one or two things? If it was only at certain parts, were these parts an extensive portion of the exam?
Put it this way.
Until you told me I was actually doing an exam, I didn't even realize I was being tested, so effortless was it.
the scientist said they still hadnt found an upper limit to his strength as he was lifting the 200 quintillion tons. so that was definitely nowhere near his max.
he also destroyed a machine capable of producing that much force with ease (you can actually see bits of the machine falling downward in the scan.)
Originally posted by CatL18Because that's his average. Post Crisis/rebirth might have better feats but their average is far lower. Plus we really don't know AS Superman's limits. It could be the same Or above Post Crisis Superman's.
I don't understand why All Star Superman is thought to be stronger than Post-crisis～Rebirth Superman.
His feat is far below post～rebirth Superman's high-end feats.
So using only high end then you are correct.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Moreover.....he had ZERO effort in lifting 200quintillion tons.He exerted some effort to break the machine. Was it rated for 201 quintillion tons? 200.0000001 quintillion tons? 2,000 quintillion tons? 2 billion quintillion trillion googleplex tons? We don't know.
But 200 quintillion? Ain't nothing but a thing. With one hand.
Wouldn't this ft be considered hyperbole?
8 years ago:
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Beat me to it. I was just making this thread up in my head as well...I would class them as:
1 Feats not depending on art - taken as gospel. Nobody here questions that Superman can fly, for example.
2. Feats depending on art - Drax's anti-Thanos aura, some depictions of speed fighting, and bullet-timing.
3. In-character narration. By this I mean, if Reed or Pym says that he's tested Cyclops' eye blasts, and they contain the equivalent of 1 million Newtons, we believe him. I won't believe Johnny Storm if he said this.
4. Comic Narration. This one is a bit iffy, particularly when we start looking at the Silver Age or pre-crisis comics.
5. Character narration. Spiderman telling the story of the Sentry stalemating Galactus.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Erm....are you high right now?If anyone else has a view, please jump in.
I agree with Reed being a trust worthy source of info when it comes to justifying things. What about that scientist though? As of right now, we are looking at a statement from a person who have no background or entitlement of being an accurate source of information. You literally have told me for yrs now that we do not accept statements. Is this an exception and if so, why?
For everyone that is viewing this, its directly aimed at Dark. If you want to know why, please PM me.
Originally posted by carver9
I agree with Reed being a trust worthy source of info when it comes to justifying things. What about that scientist though? As of right now, we are looking at a statement from a person who have no background or entitlement of being an accurate source of information. You literally have told me for yrs now that we do not accept statements. Is this an exception and if so, why?For everyone that is viewing this, its directly aimed at Dark. If you want to know why, please PM me.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Do you have examples of Leo being untrustworthy? If so, then we can cast doubt on his statement. Do you have reason to doubt him (perhaps because the actual effect was less than the statement?). If so, post it.
You're changing your argument. You've literally told me that statements doesnt hold weight but now you're saying it's more on if the person have lied before or not. Mentally documented.