Originally posted by carver9
You're changing your argument. You've literally told me that statements doesnt hold weight but now you're saying it's more on if the person have lied before or not. Mentally documented.
Lol. I've ALWAYS said it. From 2015, and 2016:
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Lol. Please re-read:http://media.animevice.com/uploads/3/36037/746281-absorptionnovablastks3.jpg
'That was my BEST shot' - Human Torch. If not going all out - what is his 'best'???
Then, re-read:
http://www.supermegamonkey.net/chronocomic/entries/fantastic_four_249-250.shtml'He took it! My FULL Nova Blast! Enough to raze the whole city block if [b]I'd let it loose
.I would say you have no idea about the comic I am talking about, but even when the comic is in front of you, it seems that you have no idea. I am NOT talking about collateral damage. I am talking about the characters themselves, a notable braggart, Johnny Storm, who boasts and is a kid prone to exaggeration - in his own words, saying that if he let it loose, it would have razed a whole city block. Which is small fry, and not that impressive compared to the JLA.
Then, I showed the well known hotheaded Johnny, who, don't forget, in character, boasts - I show him with his 'best shot', being absorbed and one-upped by Iron Man. Does this mean Iron Man can absorb a star's worth of energy, and increase it? OK.
I THEN had a narration, on panel, which says his energy output of the Nova Blast is like a nuke. Woop de do. So that's THREE scans, from different time periods, all showing that when he actually uses it, it's not all that.
I can see you trying to scan dump and drown the thread, though, with characters not in this thread - trying to muddle the issue. Stick to Human Torch showings. [/B]
And again:
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
👆This isn't Johnny Storm, who is a known braggart, talking about his Nova Flame burning hotter than the Sun, or something.
Nor is it Wolverine, using his 'best at what I do' as a way of intimidating people.
Nor even is it Superman, talking about how every opponent he faces is the toughest he has ever faced.
It's Barry, a police forensic scientist (so familiar with scientific concepts), who isn't given to boasting or lying.
Flash [b]FACT
. Not Flash Opinion, or Flash Guesstimate. [/B]
I'm OK with character statements, DEPENDING on who they're from.
Originally posted by carver9Bruv, think this over and read it again.
Lol... so wait a minute, I went from a booty humper to dirt stain. Gross crap that is on people kneecap when they slide to first base? I dont know if that's a step up in the world or a huge step down. Wow!!!Can you answer my question Dark?
Originally posted by carver9
Lol... so wait a minute, I went from a booty humper to dirt stain. Gross crap that is on people kneecap when they slide to first base? I dont know if that's a step up in the world or a huge step down. Wow!!!Can you answer my question Dark?
I'm not sure what your question is. I've always said it depends on who the statements is from. If it's Reed vs Johnny, and their statements differed on science, I would take Reed. On picking up chicks, Johnny.
On the sliding scale, I would place more emphasis on feats if they actually happened, vs character statements. Not sure why this is news? I've not been inconsistent?
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I'm not sure what your question is. I've always said it depends on who the statements is from. If it's Reed vs Johnny, and their statements differed on science, I would take Reed. On picking up chicks, Johnny.On the sliding scale, I would place more emphasis on feats if they actually happened, vs character statements. Not sure why this is news? I've not been inconsistent?
So it matters who the statement is from? Credibility? So what if the person only been shown on panel once, how credible is that person statement?
Originally posted by carver9
So it matters who the statement is from? Credibility? So what if the person only been shown on panel once, how credible is that person statement?
That person doesn't exist.
It's the word of the writer.
Did Morrison write anything to suggest Leo was a liar?
That he was incapable of reading instruments?
If there is NOTHING to suggest otherwise, why can we not take them as gospel?
Did Superman struggle with lower weights, for example?
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
That person doesn't exist.It's the word of the writer.
Did Morrison write anything to suggest Leo was a liar?
That he was incapable of reading instruments?
If there is NOTHING to suggest otherwise, why can we not take them as gospel?
Did Superman struggle with lower weights, for example?
Did Hickman write anything to suggest Corvus or Proxima is a liar?
That they were incapable of knowing Proxima weapon capabilities?
Originally posted by carver9
Did Hickman write anything to suggest Corvus or Proxima is a liar?That they were incapable of knowing Proxima weapon capabilities?
Yup.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I personally think Thanos handed shitty weapons out to his lackeys.Read their bios. Corvus Glaive..as long as his blade is whole, he cannot die.
Whoops.
Proxima Midnight ...her beams are lethal to most creatures. Yet it failed with Spectrum, Hulk, Captain America and Corvus.
Thanos gives out defective weaponry.
Lol. Did you get all nervous and feverish when you typed your post out?
'FINALLY!!!!! I've cornered DS!!!!'
Lol.
Black Dwarf was written to have unbreakable skin (see above. Also note that Proxima Midnight's spears are meant to never miss. Someone better tell Shuri, lol).
Tell that to Panther.
Tell that to Ronan.
So again:
What showings of Leo do you have to say that he is lying, or unable to read instruments - IOW, what showings contrast with his depiction of being supersmart?
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Yup.Lol. Did you get all nervous and feverish when you typed your post out?
'FINALLY!!!!! I've cornered DS!!!!'
Lol.
Black Dwarf was written to have unbreakable skin (see above. Also note that Proxima Midnight's spears are meant to never miss. Someone better tell Shuri, lol).
Tell that to Panther.
Tell that to Ronan.
So again:
What showings of Leo do you have to say that he is lying, or unable to read instruments - IOW, what showings contrast with his depiction of being supersmart?
Most doesnt mean all, lol. The full blade didnt hit Cap. Spectrum was saved. The full blade didnt hit Corvus and again, the scene said MOST, not all.
Ok, you re trying to hard. If I find a book from Morrison that states Superman is Invulnerable but he gets hurt in the same story by someone capable of hurting him, everything in that story needs to be wiped clean...statements and all? Or is this just a Marvel thang?
