Jussie Smollett attack

Started by Surtur68 pages
Originally posted by Putinbot1
It is... to people who want to bury that.

LOL! I love this post. The ignorance...it just comes off in waves. We need a hall of fame for posts here.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
It is... to people who want to bury that.

Bingo.

I think you were in an off-cycle then, but me legendary memory recalls how Surt once posted a story about how a White Trumper was stabbed in the hand by a Black "Antifa" man because he was White and "looked like a NeoNazi". The outrage over that injustice.

Then sometime later it turns out that the retard stabbed himself and filed a fake hate crime report. The Trumper silence in here was deafening.

Edit: Here's the break down: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/antifa-stab-neo-nazi-haircut/

Originally posted by Robtard
Bingo.

I think you were in an off-cycle then, but me legendary memory recalls how Surt once posted a story about how a White Trumper was stabbed in the hand by a Black "Antifa" man because he was White and "looked like a NeoNazi". The outrage over that injustice.

Then sometime later it turns out that the retard stabbed himself and filed a fake hate crime report. The Trumper silence in here was deafening.

Edit: Here's the break down: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/antifa-stab-neo-nazi-haircut/

Rob you're kinda being a piece of dog shit with your whataboutism, I thought that was wrong.

Is it now okay? The best part will be when you say it's not whataboutism.

I've yet to change my original stance that Smollet should face charges if guilty. That still stands, so it's not whataboutism. Smollet is a POS if guilty.

So it seems you're making something up to deflect away from your previous poor behavior.

Originally posted by Robtard
I've yet to change my original stance that Smollet should face charges if guilty. That still stands, so it's not whataboutism. Smollet is a POS if guilty.

So it seems you're making something up to deflect away from your previous poor behavior.

Great spin bro, 7.8/10

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Thank you. You proved my point. None of that warrants 3 swat teams. As far as the charges if found guilty he needs to face the music.

I win again🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
I've yet to change my original stance that Smollet should face charges if guilty. That still stands, so it's not whataboutism. Smollet is a POS if guilty.

So it seems you're making something up to deflect away from your previous poor behavior.

“If guilty”

Clearly people walk around in MAGA hats wearing hoodies and nooses and carrying bleach and yelling in the streets beating up c lost list celebrities

Originally posted by BrolyBlack

Yeah, but I have a counter argument:

TRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUMP!

Boom! Beat that!

Yes, we have something in this country called "due process", I know you Trumpers like to ignore that when it suits you.

So while I personally believe Smollet is more likely guilty here of being in the hoax than not, it's still "if guilty" as of right now.

Case in point:

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Thank you. You proved my point. None of that warrants 3 swat teams. As far as the charges if found guilty he needs to face the music.

I win again🙂

That works for Roger, but not for Smollet it seems. Wonder why.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, we have something in this country called "due process", I know you Trumpers like to ignore that when it suits you.

So while I personally believe Smollet is more likely guilty here of being in the hoax than not, it's still "if guilty" as of right now.

It's Trumpers whining Betsy Devos wants more due process in colleges, right bro? Yeah, dipshit leftists aren't whining that people accused of rape can now cross examine their accusers. Good stuff. A b*tch fit was not thrown by you guys 👆

Originally posted by Surtur
It's Trumpers whing Betsy Devos wants more due process in colleges, right bro? Yeah, dipshit leftists aren't whining that people accused of rape can now cross examine their accusers. Good stuff. A b*tch fit was not thrown by you guys 👆

You're rage has you ranting nigh incoherently now.

But if I understand you correctly, no, I never said those accused of rape shouldn't be allowed due process.

Originally posted by Robtard
You're rage has you ranting nigh incoherently now.

But if I understand you correctly, no, I never said those accused of rape shouldn't be allowed due process.

What is incoherent? You're saying Trumpers are against due process, yet the left is crying over these new rules. You specifically might not be shedding salt, but plenty of your bro's are. You calling them little shits?

"If guilty" is okay to say in regards to Roger Stone, "If guilty" is unthinkable in regards to Jussie Smollet. /that

Originally posted by Robtard
"If guilty" is okay to say in regards to Roger Stone, "If guilty" is unthinkable in regards to Jussie Smollet. /that

Bwahahaha.

I mean, just look at this very thread and the times the "if guilty" sentiment in regards to Smollet is attacked by you people. Just look at this page. Trumpers be Trumpers though.

Originally posted by Robtard
I mean, just look at this very thread and the times the "if guilty" sentiment in regards to Smollet is attacked by you people. Just look at this page. Trumpers be Trumpers though.

Dude it's not gonna fly lol. "If guilty" is like the morons in the media screaming "we said allegedly!".

Do better.

Originally posted by Surtur
Dude it's not gonna fly lol. "If guilty" is like the morons in the media screaming "we said allegedly!".

Do better.

HYG:

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Thank you. You proved my point. None of that warrants 3 swat teams. As far as the charges if found guilty he needs to face the music.

I win again🙂

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
“If guilty”

Clearly people walk around in MAGA hats wearing hoodies and nooses and carrying bleach and yelling in the streets beating up c lost list celebrities

Originally posted by Robtard
HYG:

Rob he wasn't one of the people who pounced on this initially. That's where the hypocrisy comes in, if he'd pounced and declared guilt and then fell back to "well IF he's guilty". In other words, if he'd pulled a Kamala Harris or Corey Booker.

I know you knew this, so why did you bother? Did you think some of your less intelligent bro's wouldn't notice? If so, what's that say about your faith in them?

No, what you people did was ignore the story when you first thought it was a legit hate crime on a gay Black man. Only became involved and made a thread after it came out that it could be a hoax.

Who here did what you claim? I didn't even know about this until Broly made this thread.

Originally posted by Robtard
No, what you people did was ignore the story when you first thought it was a legit hate crime on a gay Black man. Only became involved and made a thread after it came out that it could be a hoax.

Who here did what you claim? I didn't even know about this until Broly made this thread.

Uh no we didn't ignore it. I posted about it in the triggered thread before it was given it's own topic. Do better.