Jussie Smollett attack

Started by Surtur68 pages

Lmao, first guy he talks to "we gotta look at both sides here, he wanted to show a problem in America".

Good stuff.

YouTube video

Legit not kidding: NYT put out an Emmet Till article on Thursday lol. True it's black history month, but the timing is strange since they've had all month to do it.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lmao, first guy he talks to "we gotta look at both sides here, he wanted to show a problem in America".

Good stuff.

YouTube video

Almost the exact same thing Trump said, yet I bet that kid blew a gasket when Trump said it first.

Though when you really think about it Till's case is a clear example of why you should not just believe the victim because reasons. Whether that reason is cuz racism or woke-ism it doesn't matter.

Originally posted by cdtm
It doesn't hurt someone's conspiracy theory. 🙂

Ok, so let's say he buys drugs from these guys. A movie mogul with a vendetta against Smollett knows this, and decides to use it to set him up, talks the two attacking him with promises of lucrative movie contracts/payouts, and an assurance if they cooperate with police they probably won't go to prison, and will be very very rich even if they do.

After the attack, leakers conveniently pop up with tips of Smollett hiring his own attackers, which Smollett will deny because it's not true. The checks he used to buy drugs (Which are an incredibly stupid way to buy drugs) get found, and assumed to be for hiring them.

Smollett is left looking like a fool in one of the worst "self hits" ever made, which makes this one of the best "takedowns" ever made, because no one would ever suspect he was the victim.

All the pieces fit, if someone wanted to go this route. It's fool proof.

Little glaring details like the fact that he showed up with the noose still around his neck to talk to the police indicates that he staged it himself. Nice conspiracy though. I made up one back in the day when Kanye's mom died in surgery that 50 cent paid off the doctors to have her killed as retribution for him having lost the album sales battle.

Originally posted by Surtur
Though when you really think about it Till's case is a clear example of why you should not just believe the victim because reasons. Whether that reason is cuz racism or woke-ism it doesn't matter.

“When I first told people about it I couldn’t beleive they were skeptical about it because you know, the truth is the truth, how could not not beleive it”

Jessie Smollett

😂

What makes me upset is the fact that people are going to take reports of real racism less seriously.

This isn’t the last time this is going to happen. Someone will now plan and prepare are more elaborate hoax and the media will be dying to believe it.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
“When I first told people about it I couldn’t beleive they were skeptical about it because you know, the truth is the truth, how could not not beleive it”

Jessie Smollett

😂

Originally posted by mike brown
Little glaring details like the fact that he showed up with the noose still around his neck to talk to the police indicates that he staged it himself.

Yeah, in hindsight it's pretty obvious. Anyone who was really dragged/choked/etc in a noose would take that shit off their neck the second they were able.

This was highly suspicious from day one, stop acting like you guys just had no idea at all this is what it would lead to lol. It's not genuine. nobody believes you.

Still laughing at "in hindsight", as if from the very moment the detail emerged he kept the noose around his neck it wasn't suspicious 😆

oh did you score another pretend victory? Good for you!

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
oh did you score another pretend victory? Good for you!

No, all that happened is that you embarrassed yourself. Do better next time.

when did that happen? only stated that a conspiracy theory was plausible. is it that you don't know what plausible means, and think it's a synonym for "true"?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
when did that happen? only stated that a conspiracy theory was plausible. is it that you don't know what plausible means, and think it's a synonym for "true"?

Lol you say "in hindsight" as if it took you weeks to figure out it was suspicious he never even took the noose off.

To be fair, maybe it did take him that long to figure out the story was suspicious.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol you say "in hindsight" as if it took you weeks to figure out it was suspicious he never even took the noose off.

you're lying. I never commented in this thread until this morning, one page ago, to say that I found a conspiracy satisfyingly possible and you got triggered. stop acting like a phaggot.

Originally posted by Silent Master
To be fair, maybe it did take him that long to figure out the story was suspicious.

Is this true Bash? Did I give you too much credit?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you're lying. I never commented in this thread until this morning, one page ago, to say that I found a conspiracy satisfyingly possible and you got triggered. stop acting like a phaggot.

You said "in hindsight" as if you didn't question it immediately. I never said you posted in this thread, but I'm sure you heard the story. Or are you now going to claim you were blissfully unaware until recently?

Originally posted by Surtur
You said "in hindsight" as if you didn't question it immediately. I never said you posted in this thread, but I'm sure you heard the story. Or are you now going to claim you were blissfully unaware until recently?

I had no opinion on the matter, so I never commented. This somehow proves you won, again? way to deflect from your lying.