2020 Presidential Election Discussion

Started by Newjak523 pages

Originally posted by snowdragon
That has nothing to do with collaboration, I don't see anything in the news commenting on china or iran atm either.

Let's hope republicans don't push the hunter biden story.

Oh please not they had actually had a story they would have already pushed it.

Originally posted by snowdragon
That has nothing to do with collaboration, I don't see anything in the news commenting on china or iran atm either.

Let's hope republicans don't push the hunter biden story.

Bingo.

And hell think about the russian bounties story. People *here* pushed it. There is no more evidence it is real than there is the hunter story is real.

Do you think any of those who believed the bounty story will admit it? Lol. Nope.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
This isn't like your crazy tin-foil hat Russia! Russia! Russia! conspiracy theory in which there was literally zero evidence to support it.

We are talking about actual dirty shit that happened that has been confirmed. No amount of denying it from you or left-wing "fact checker" sites is ever gonna change that.

You crazies on the left held onto that Russia shit for four god**** years with no actual evidence to support it so don't b*tch at me about Trump supporters not accepting the election results when there is actual evidence of wrongdoing.

You can call us "sore losers" or being "butthurt" and that's fine. Name-calling won't change the fact that lots of dirty shit went on.

Actually, there's more proof that Russia interfered to help Trump get elected in 2016 than there is of "massive voter fraud" in 2020, our own intelligence agencies said Russia interfered and getting Trump elected was their goal.

Originally posted by Robtard
You're deflection has been noted.

The matter was saying a President is illegitimate; I never once said Trump was illegitimate. I in fact said he "won by the shit-rules in place" back in 2016, I did and still do have an issue with the EC though.

No need to pretend you cared about facts, you literally supported the russia issue over and over.

Don't play word salads with how you represented the situation.

Originally posted by Newjak
Oh please not they had actually had a story they would have already pushed it.

There was no real story with russian interference and yet it was pushed.

Dems even brought facebook into court to cry about it. I thought it was a private company tho, but I can't keep their ever changing standards straight, can you?

Originally posted by Surtur
Remove russian "interference". Does Trump still win in 2016, in your opinion?

Prove your intellect right now by acknowledging yes he does. Prove you aren't this "russia russia russia" type 🙂

I don't know for certain as I don't have a crystal ball, but very likely, I'd bet on he would. But the result not flipping doesn't change the problem in the first place. It's like saying it's okay to cheat as long as you don't win. No, cheating is still wrong.

Save me your games and try to act normal for once in a convo, okay.

Originally posted by Newjak
Oh please not they had actually had a story they would have already pushed it.

They had it but Tucker Carlson lost it or something.

Originally posted by snowdragon
No need to pretend you cared about facts, you literally supported the russia issue over and over.

Don't play word salads with how you represented the situation.

Russian interference happened and it was to help Trump, our own intel says this. Flipping and dancing around these facts is you flirting with the Trumper doll. Watch it.

It's literally what I said in 2016, he won by the shit-rules in place.

Originally posted by Robtard
I don't know for certain as I don't have a crystal ball, but very likely, I'd bet on he would. But the result not flipping doesn't change the problem in the first place. It's like saying it's okay to cheat as long as you don't win. No, cheating is still wrong.

Save me your games and try to act normal for once in a convo, okay.

The issue isn't that it wasn't a problem in 2016, the issue is that russians didn't just begin interfering in 2016 and certain inferiors said nothing until 2016.

So either they were so ignorant they didn't know about the past attempts or they just didn't care until trump. You wanna decide on which it was?

Trump’s lead in Georgia now just around 3,500. Still some votes out there to count. Gonna be very very close there. Biden is seen as the favorite currently but the state college go either way.

Pennsylvania continues getting closer. Still 8% or so of the vote out there. Lot of data people looking at the state think Biden will end up winning it by 100,000 votes but that’s only if the margin continues as it’s been.

Originally posted by BackFire
Trump’s lead in Georgia now just around 3,500. Still some votes out there to count. Gonna be very very close there. Biden is seen as the favorite currently but the state college go either way.

Pennsylvania continues getting closer. Still 8% or so of the vote out there. Lot of data people looking at the state think Biden will end up winning it by 100,000 votes but that’s only if the margin continues as it’s been.

Just to be clear, you are saying Biden is seen as a favorite in a state his now losing?

Originally posted by Surtur
Remove russian "interference". Does Trump still win in 2016, in your opinion?

Prove your intellect right now by acknowledging yes he does. Prove you aren't this "russia russia russia" type 🙂

Too late, he and most every other leftist on this forum already have shown that they are. They had literally zero basis for that BS Russia investigation. It was based on a debunked BS piss dossier and it cost us no telling how many tax dollars to pay for that crap. And it was all just so the Trump-haters could soothe their butthurt over Clinton losing.

Then of course we had the fake impeachment BS which never should've happened and which distracted Trump right before the Coronavirus hit.

For four years the crybabies on the left have been "resisting" and now they're gonna whine about it because we are. Only difference is our resistance will be based on things that actually happened, unlike that fake "Trump is a Russian agent!" BS that they were screaming for so long.

I hate beets, they are seen as a favorite vegetable of mine.

Does that make any sense?

Originally posted by Surtur
The issue isn't that it wasn't a problem in 2016, the issue is that russians didn't just begin interfering in 2016 and certain inferiors said nothing until 2016.

So either they were so ignorant they didn't know about the past attempts or they just didn't care until trump. You wanna decide on which it was?

You're correct there, but I also don't recall another candidate openly inviting a foreign power to help them. eg When a story broke that Russia was trying to help Sanders get the nom, he openly decried Russia helping him.

And no, you will not be brushing it aside with "Trump was just the jokes".

Originally posted by Robtard
You're correct there, but I also don't recall another candidate openly inviting a foreign power to help them. eg When a story broke that Russia was trying to help Sanders get the nom, he openly decried Russia helping him.

And no, you will not be brushing it aside with "Trump was just the jokes".

I won't brush it aside as a joke as long as you have condemned every left leaning poster here who tried to pull the same "i was just joking" stuff.

Did you?

Originally posted by Surtur
Just to be clear, you are saying Biden is seen as a favorite in a state his now losing?

Yes very slightly, based on the fact that mail in votes are largely the ones left to count and they’ve been trending for Biden in that state. It’s going to be extremely close though and could go either way.

Originally posted by Surtur
I won't brush it aside as a joke as long as you have condemned every left leaning poster here who tried to pull the same "i was just joking" stuff.

Did you?

You're now trying to equate a presidential candidate openly asking a hostile foreign power for help/interference in an election with some rando people on a message board saying something...

Yeah, you know you lost the argument and have nothing else.

A state official from Georgia earlier said the final tally could have a difference of under 1000 votes. It could end up being the closest state since Florida in 2000.

Originally posted by BackFire
Yes very slightly, based on the fact that mail in votes are largely the ones left to count and they’ve been trending for Biden in that state. It’s going to be extremely close though and could go either way.

Don't you feel like this is the type of shit that causes these folk to lose credibility?

Any case where Trump loses he should appeal it... all the way to Supreme Court if he has to.