I think there are multiple ways to pay for them, ultimately I think she is a proponent of modern monetary theory, which I see as sort of an off shoot of neo-Keynesian economic theory, which in essence posits that the government can create money in order to grow the economy, but she also has some other traditional ideas how to raise the money, including reversing the many significant tax cuts on the richest, and actual significant amount taxation on corporation, as well as saving expenses by curtailing the runaway spending on the military. Additionally a lot of these proposals would be cheaper than the status quo anyways.
Yeah, climate change is a good example, already the costs of climate change are significant, and they will only skyrocket, and communities will have to pay them, while they never show up as expenses on any companies balance sheet. That is incredibly anti-market, so making companies pay for these damages is the most sensible thing to do.
YouTube video JC tribute.
Originally posted by Silent Master
You're giving her way too much credit for deep thinking, this is a lady that doesn't even know what a tax credit is.
...or what a kitchen garbage disposal machine is lol.
She is the dumbest person in Congress, easily.... except maybe for that black democrat congressman who stupidly thinks that islands are flloating around in the ocean like float toys float around in a bathtub lmao.
Who knows, maybe AOC thinks that as well lol. Certainly wouldn't surprise me if she did as that is her level of sheer stupidity.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnaeYou believe the Earth is 6,000 years old. 😐
...or what a kitchen garbage disposal machine is lol.She is the dumbest person in Congress, easily.... except maybe for that black democrat congressman who stupidly thinks that islands are flloating around in the ocean like float toys float around in a bathtub lmao.
Who knows, maybe AOC thinks that as well lol. Certainly wouldn't surprise me if she did as that is her level of sheer stupidity.
Not my country but I had a interesting thought...all this talk about Trump 2024....
Why would the Republican party want that?
He is clearly not a good candidate, losing to Biden (who people thought was a bad candidate)....and losing the popular vote to Clinton (highly disliked person)....
The vote clearly show that people wanted to vote red but hated Trump. Let's say you replace him with somebody else....there is very good chance the Republicans have the Senate, House and Supreme Court....and Presidency. Why would they want him to run again in 4 years?
LOL. Of course the god**** globalist warmongering establishment doesn't really want a populist candidate like Trump. They didn't really want him in 2016 either.
It is what the people wanted though.... and that's what truly mattered. And they still want him. If anything, he has actually gained in popularity since 2016.
I know you anti-Trumpers like to troll by ignoring just how popular he is but Trump is one of the most popular republican presidents of all time and no amount of you all denying it and calling him insulting names will ever change that fact.