Originally posted by mike brown
might have lead to deaths of we had a justice system that relied solely on the whims of a single man, sure. I only pointed out the distinction because " wanted innocent men put to death" almost makes it sound like he knew about but was indifferent to their innocence
In 2016, Trump insisted the Central Park Five were guilty, despite being officially exonerated by DNA evidence, because "The police doing the original investigation said they were guilty."
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Cohen’s descriptions of Trump don’t come as much of a surprise. Four decades ago, Trump and his father were sued by the federal government, which accused the Trumps of giving preferential treatment to white people trying to rent the Trump company’s apartments. Donald Trump allegedly mistreated black workers in his casinos and, according to a former hotel executive, once said “laziness is a trait in blacks.” Years later, Trump would call for five black and Latino teenagers to be put to death after they were accused of raping a jogger in Central Park. The teenagers were later exonerated.From the Wahington post today.
I don't think to this day Trump has apologized for condemning the "Central Park Five", I think he might even maintain that they'll guilty, despite being cleared via DNA testing/evidence.
Which is no wonder, as he was one of the loudest Birther conspiracy shouters for eight years and I doubt he's changed his mind there as well.
edit: Just saw Adam already covered the key points above and don't bother with SM, he's doing the time-waster-troll skit as usual to deflect away from Trump
Originally posted by Robtard
I don't think to this day Trump has apologized for condemning the "Central Park Five", I think he might even maintain that they'll guilty, despite being cleared via DNA testing/evidence.Which is no wonder, as he was one of the loudest Birther conspiracy shouters for eight years and I doubt he's changed his mind there as well.
edit: Just saw Adam already covered the key points above and don't bother with SM, he's doing the time-waster-troll skit as usual to deflect away from Trump
Gotta love the fact you're calling someone else a troll in a thread that was created to troll 👆
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
From 30 years ago. Very relevant.
Time didn't stop you from making endless threads on Clinton, multiple each day. eg Where you pushed the fake news story that Clinton gleefully got free a child rapist and laughed about it (you did this more than once no less)
So why is it wrong for PutinB to make a thread about Trump's past, especially considering Trump still believes the five innocent Black men are guilty even though they've been cleared?
edit: This one: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
The solution to asymmetrical polarization is not for the party that has remained stable to move toward the extremists.
Funny how you could be describing either political party with that statement, especially the one whose supporters and sympathizers are bringing up 30 year old shit to justify a recent and completely unrelated wrongdoing from the other political party .