Originally posted by Emperordmbvape...
I mean, me personally, I go into a stall because I can vape in it lol.
I just don't like piss in my shorts. I squeeze my cock like an empty toothpaste and then helicopter it around and give it a couple more squeezes. I do that at the urinal too but you can't be as willy nilly.
The stall is freedom.
i believe that cultures of anti-logic and anti-reason are the product of unresolved infantile/juvenile issues, usually caused by parental over-coddling.
a two year old baby will cry over anything, and be absolutely certain that their emotions validate their tantrums, even if they are screaming over literally nothing. that's a psychological and intellectual hurdle that all/most of us managed to scale at a very early age, but it most often requires the help and tough-love of a parent to bring us along. but some parents just hug the kid and go 'there there, poor baby' after their tantrums until they're 35.
Originally posted by Surtur
It reminds me of this, lmao:BuzzFeed Guys Test Their Testosterone Levels. The Results Are Exactly What You'd Expect.
Hahaha what a collection of weak, effeminate losers.
I strongly suggest for all men to regularly check their testosterone levels and compare to the PAST averages, not current averages, as it is a sliding scale.
"An academic study from researchers at Brunel University London assessed 171 men, looking at their height, weight, overall physical strength and bicep circumference, along with their views on redistribution of wealth and income inequality. The study, published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, ​found that weaker men were more likely to favor socialist policies than stronger men."
I want to ready this study. On the surface it makes sense. If you are in favor of hard work, and follow the general masculine principles of dedication, worth ethic, and competition, extreme versions of wealth redistribution and socialism is incongruent with your beliefs. Masculinity is very nurturing and social safety nets are a byproduct of the "patriarchy" that everyone so despises on the left, but coddling society is disgusting and leads to little losers like soyboys and incels. These guys need strong male role models.
But I never take "academic studies" at face value without reading the data anymore.
If you are an incel and can't get laid, then grow up. Women are nature's quality check. They bear the baby, and have the most investment in a pregnancy, so naturally they will want the most attractive of mates to invest their seed. It means you have to step up your game. Some people are just screwed and are ugly, but you can always make steps to improve yourself to some degree.
I don't know what the cure for Soyboys is. I feel like it's a different reflection of the same problem. Instead of giving up women, they try and virtue signal to try and get brownie points. Which is f*cking hilarious and reveals a complete misunderstanding of women and nature. You CANNOT negotiate attraction. That is just biology at play. Being subservient, and washing the dishes, in exchange for sex from your girl dries up a vagina faster than anything I've seen.
On a side note:
If you have the cash and time I suggest you go to some of the most cosmopolitan cities in the States. I highly recommend San Fransisco or Silicon Valley. It's so full of limp-wristed female boys, it's like shooting fish in a barrel. Women will, and I mean this literally, gravitate towards you like you are a celebrity if you lift weights, are moderately good-looking, or aren't some genetic dead-end. One of my best friends is an Account Manager for a start-up, and I didn't really believe him, so he took me to two conferences in the last 5 months. You can bang like 3-4 hot chicks a day, and they'll be the most vocal, tech-driven, "feminist" type on the surface begging for some domination.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
if you're suggesting it's an all-men's club, you might be right.i don't know because i consider all these sites to be garbage, and don't care about anything they print/post, and really couldn't care less about their corporate demographics.
dump them all and you'll be better informed
10000%
Be very careful what you read. It really shapes your opinions in subconscious ways. Remember to ALWAYS be critical. I suggest taking a history course at a local CC or University that teaches you a holistic approach when evaluating a piece of writing including writer motivations and the demographic it is writing to.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
if you're suggesting it's an all-men's club, you might be right.i don't know because i consider all these sites to be garbage, and don't care about anything they print/post, and really couldn't care less about their corporate demographics.
dump them all and you'll be better informed
I don't actively every read daily wire. and I hardly click on links to them, this was the first time in a while.
Buzzfeed, however, has consistently been re-reported on by large media outlets where is the daily wire is not.
So buzzfeed has done more damage to the population than daily wire.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
As a grandfather who is presently married for the third time and hoping to start my final third set of children in my 50's, the only advice I can give Soy boys and Incels is have a big cock like me, works wonders.
Most guys think their dick is bigger than it is, if yours is so big though, why do you marriages keep failing you?
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Buzzfeed, however, has consistently been re-reported on by large media outlets where is the daily wire is not.
you are mistaken, unless you consider foxnews to be another silly tabloid rag.
Originally posted by BrolyBlackBecause people grow apart, got any kids mate? Ever been in a relationship for ten years or more? The best thing about life is I get older my wives stay the same age.
Most guys think their dick is bigger than it is, if yours is so big though, why do you marriages keep failing you?
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
I'm more referring to the major stories like the Steele dossier and Michael Cohen story that had to be retracted.Anyways, this isn't about journalism or media outlets, it's about the OP. I won't post on media matters anymore.
news networks are like multi-headed hydras, except one head is noble and essential to preserving our democracy. the others are deceptive trolls, particularly tv and clickbait trash web, like fox/cnn has become. there are legitimate and essential journalists in all these networks/newspapers/etc, however. they put their personal safety/lives at risk often, and at least deserve to be on a pedestal above these garbage tabloid rags, as well as their corporate shitlord bosses, in terms of who to lend more credibility to.
Originally posted by Bashar TegA lot of truth in this. As Twain stated you don't read the papers you are illinformed, you do and you are misinformed.
news networks are like multi-headed hydras, except one head is noble and essential to preserving our democracy. the others are deceptive trolls, particularly tv and clickbait trash web, like fox/cnn has become. there are legitimate and essential journalists in all these networks, however. they put their personal safety/lives at risk often, and at least deserve to be on a pedestal above these garbage tabloid rags, in terms of who to lend more credibility to.