Both toxic masculinity and toxic femininity are an inability to adopt responsibility for vulnerability.
Toxic masculinity does this by concealing and denying it, becoming overly macho, aggressive. Violence over an insult to honor and all that shit.
Toxic femininity does this by instead flaunting vulnerability as a social weapon. Victimhood culture, also passive aggressiveness by which you can undermine someone so if they snap on you it seems like an escalation of things.
My problem is that a lot of the people who most loudly proclaim the evils of toxic masculinity are embodiments of toxic femininity.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
Both toxic masculinity and toxic femininity are an inability to adopt responsibility for vulnerability.Toxic masculinity does this by concealing and denying it, becoming overly macho, aggressive. Violence over an insult to honor and all that shit.
Toxic femininity does this by instead flaunting vulnerability as a social weapon. Victimhood culture, also passive aggressiveness by which you can undermine someone so if they snap on you it seems like an escalation of things.
My problem is that a lot of the people who most loudly proclaim the evils of toxic masculinity are embodiments of toxic femininity.
To you last paragraph, that statement cuts both ways.: a lot of the people who most loudly proclaim the evils of toxic femininity are embodiments of toxic masculinity.
I've know you've seen it, just as I've seen the acts in your statement. Both need to be put down.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
they're just as silly and idiotic as people who believe that toxic masculinity/femininity doesn't exist.
Male and female toxicity exists. However male toxicity is more condemned them females who practice it.
Men can be dicks, women certainly can be bitches, both are entirely practiced attitudes that those individuals behavior want to exhibit said behavior.
Female toxicity can be just as bad as male toxicity. Soyboys generally beleive males/masculinity bad, female/feminism good.
I don’t generally believe men should be raised as beta males. It produces a watered down society of weak men.
Weak men don’t serve anyone well in society whether it be winning wars, protecting women.
If you are a weak man and believe in men being weak to advance that narrative you end up with a generation of ***** boys who live at home until they are 40.
Re: Soy Boys and Incels
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
[b]Soy Boy
A modern effeminate male, typically a millennial. A self-described feminist-leftist who majored in Social Justice Studies, Gender Studies, Ethnic Studies, Theater, Dance or any other range of useless college degree fields. Shows fear and revulsion at the sight of masculine men. Usually appears in public wearing flannel, skinny jeans often of a short length to resemble Capri pants. May have dyed hair and a beard that he spends at least a half hour each morning grooming. Urinates standing up in a stall in the men's room rather than at the urinal. Has a penchant for expensive Starbucks flavored drinks with soy milk and flavored craft beer. Likely a vegan or vegetarian. Raised by dominant man-hating feminist mother either without a father or with a cuckold henpecked man for a father. May own a car, likely a Toyota Prius or Nissan Cube, but has no concept of how to open the hood or change a tire. More likely rides a fixed gear bike. Completely lacking in any mechanical skills and proud of that fact. May spends hours or days gaming in his mother's basement. Offers nothing to society.Incel
aka "involuntarily celibate", a person (usually male) who has a horrible personality and treats women as sexual objects and thinks his lack of a sex life comes from being "ugly" when its really just his blatant sexism and terrible attitude. incels have little to no self-awareness; even when they see other "ugly" men with girlfriends, they consider these men to be tricksters who have somehow beat the system and can get women despite being cursed with unattractiveness (in other words, they're respectful to women and women are attracted to their personalities, but incels can't comprehend such a phenomenon). they believe that women owe them sex, and many of the more extreme incels like to spend time in incel communities on the internet coming up with ways to make women have sex with them (often involving genocide of people of color, genocide of "Chads" (men who have sex), taking rights away from women, raping them, having sex with women's dead bodies, and other horrid, disgusting things. they can't understand that that is PRECISELY why women want nothing to do with them).
-------------------------
Both are equally disgusting, so how can we reduce the population of these characters?
Is it nature vs nurture stemming from the political ideology of the parents and upbringing, or is it biology? [/B]
Soy Boys are more likely to be trannies, which means they are more likely to let me phuck them in the ass. Therefore Soy Boys are better