Greenpeace Founder calls AOC a Pompous Little Twit

Because she is Stupid and a Hypocrite?

Originally posted by Emperordmb
If the world is doomed in 12 years and action on this is so urgent, why does she want to pour any government spending into all these other costly priorities?

Did she actually say that as a fact, or was it hyperbole to push the "we need change now" sentiment?

Difficult to tell with her.

Fair enough. I doubt she meant it literally, that in 2031ish, we're all dead.

Originally posted by Silent Master
How is he strawmanning her position?

Because he's making out that her policy is to ban fossil fuels across the entire planet.

Originally posted by dadudemon
"I did not attack him!'

*Proceeds to layout exactly how he attacked him*

Alright then, chap.

Care to actually address the points, though? I mean, you can try to play lawyer word games and act like you didn't try to bring the ad hominem insult hammer to avoid addressing his actual points. 🙂

😆

Since when has there been some sort of age restriction on who can and cant talk about ww2?

There isn't, but seeing her retarded comment. maybe there should be an IQ restriction.

Originally posted by Silent Master
There isn't, but seeing her retarded comment. maybe there should be an IQ restriction.

Putting restrictions on her makes you no better than her. It’s always best to let people speak out instead. It also makes it easier to point out their stupidity when they open their mouth.

So his plan was to respond to her retarded comments with a reterded one of his own. Weird strategy.

Do u really believe there possibly should be an iq restriction or were u just engaging in the same kind of hyperbole she probably was when she made her comments about it being our ww2 and such?

Originally posted by SquallX
Putting restrictions on her makes you no better than her. It's always best to let people speak out instead. It also makes it easier to point out their stupidity when they open their mouth.

I'm not putting any restrictions on her.

You literally implied it in this post:

Originally posted by Silent Master
There isn't, but seeing her retarded comment. maybe there should be an IQ restriction.

Originally posted by Raptor22
So his plan was to respond to her retarded comments with a reterded one of his own. Weird strategy.

Do u really believe there possibly should be an iq restriction or were u just engaging in the same kind of hyperbole she probably was when she made her comments about it being our ww2 and such?

My point was that it's better to be silent and thought a fool, than open your mouth and remove all doubt.

The lady could use some minders.

Pompous twit

Originally posted by SquallX
Putting restrictions on her makes you no better than her. It’s always best to let people speak out instead. It also makes it easier to point out their stupidity when they open their mouth.

Yeah, she's a gift to conservatives. We need her to be able to speak.

Originally posted by Robtard
You literally implied it in this post:

That wasn't my implication at all, you inferring something doesn't mean I was implying it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
That wasn't my implication at all, you inferring something doesn't mean I was implying it.

Since there isn’t any resolution here and we are all here to waste time, what are you here for Rob?

Rob is lying, I never actually said there should be a IQ restriction. I posed a possibility that "maybe there should be". he needs to learn to curb his bias.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Rob is lying, I never actually said there should be a IQ restriction. I posed a possibility that "maybe there should be". he needs to learn to curb his bias.

Rob usually lies about most things. TDS has rotted his brain