Originally posted by Silent Masterwords of wisdom.
My point was that it's better to be silent and thought a fool, than open your mouth and remove all doub.
Originally posted by Silent Masterwords of wisdom.
My point was that it's better to be silent and thought a fool, than open your mouth and remove all doub.
Originally posted by Robtard
His first point is correct, we can't ride ourselves of fossil fuels anytime soon. We can reduce the need for them by upping renewable like wind and solar, I've said this many a time over the years, eg my last big talk was with Kurk over it. AOC's timetable is not realistic, but that doesn't mean her end-goal is stupid, justs needs to be tweaked to fit reality.The second one seems like he's strawmanning her while ranting? IIRC, her comment was about Climate Change being this generation's WWII, I took that as the big fight that must be faced. Though not 100% sure what his exact point was here
Thanks for taking the time to address his points directly with a bit of effort. I think you forgot what Robtard of old was like and you've been talking to the miscreants for so long that you almost forgot what it was like to put down a stream of thoughts on this message board.
To your first point, agree 100%. I would use stronger language than you, though: it needs to be tweaked quite a bit but the objectives don't really need to change. The objectives are not even controversial, really.
To this point, I disagree. AOC truly and honestly believes humans will die by the tens of millions in the next 10-20 years similar to WWII levels of death. She's made this clear with her "world is ending in 12 years" point, too. I thought she was making a point and it was symbolic but she doubled down on it instead of saying, "Don't be idiots, it was clearly a tipping point of no return that I was talking about, not the literal end of the world." Wish she would say that, though.