Drag Queens being Brought to Public Schools to read to kids

Started by BrolyBlack20 pages

Ok lets go over this line by line since you started.

Originally posted by Raptor22
If its just some cross dressers coming in and reading stuff like The Little Engine Who Could to show kids that dudes in dresses are people too, then i see no problem with it. Or if they're normal kids stories that happen to include a dude or 2 in a skirt, im fine with that.

If they're propaganda (for lack of a better word) that pushes a certain philosophical ideology such as, genders a myth there are no such things as girls or boys, or other nonsense like that, should be discussed somewhere thats not a public school imho.

Why do men dressed as women need to read to kids? What is the point of it? There really is no point, other than to be edgy and virtue signal among the parets, and the teachers or administers who allowed it are just trying to be edge lords.

Originally posted by Raptor22
it could teach kids at a young age to be accepting of people whos only difference is the type of clothes they prefer to wear.

Or it could confuse the shit out of them. How would they even know they are not really women, or what if they can tell but are uncomfortable with it.

Since when is it right to put kids in uncomfortable positions and or purposely confuse them. Why do we have to teach kids about drag queens at 7, is nothing off limits now?

Originally posted by Raptor22
See ur doing this thing where u just make crazy stuff up in ur head then go on a rant about them. Then want me to answer for the nutty stuff u made up.

Me-

"If its just some cross dressers coming in and reading stuff like The Little Engine Who Could to show kids that dudes in dresses are people too, then i see no problem with it. Or if they're normal kids stories that happen to include a dude or 2 in a skirt, im fine with that."

You-

"I think you must be dumb to think men who perform in gay strip clubs to entertain other gay men for the purpose of sexual arousal is equivalent to a farmer."

Do u honestly not see some disconnect there?

So either u think most guys who wear dresses, perform in gay strip clubs to entertain other gay men for the purpose of sexual arousal, or ur taking what i said, mixing it with other stuff that i didnt say, and coming out with a jumbled fictional mess, that u for some reason expect me to answer for.

So normal to you is men wearing dresses?

See what ur response should have been was

Hey Raptor, im sorry man. U actually didnt say any of those things i accused u of and ranted like a maniac about. I acted a little crazy there. My bad. If u wouldnt mind could we go back to what u actually said and discuss that like adults, instead of like how ive been acting.

And would have been all like

Yeah Broly u were a bit nutty there for a min but it happens to the best of us blah blah blah... U get the point.

Ill give u another shot to do it right.

Originally posted by Robtard
There seems to be some confusion among the certain expected types.

A Drag Queen isn't a transgender person, it's literally a man who dresses up in women's clothes and makeup (often exaggerated) for the purposes of entertaining. Usually singing and dancing. While most are generally gay men, there are straight drag queens as well.

You did not watch the video. I almost made the same mistake you did. I thought it was only about transvestites but it's more about them teaching transgenderism.

Originally posted by Robtard
Mrs. Doubtfire (1993) just became excomunicatus, so wills the Emperor.

Mrs. Doubtfire, a movie with a rating of PG-13, that has adult themes in it such as divorce, sex, child custody battles, unemployment, and rebound relationships post-divorce is hardly a movie with 5-year-olds as the intended target audience.

I see what you're doing and I get it...it just sucks as a good rhetoric.

Originally posted by dadudemon
You did not watch the video. I almost made the same mistake you did. I thought it was only about transvestites but it's more about them teaching transgenderism.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Mrs. Doubtfire, a movie with a rating of PG-13, that has adult themes in it such as divorce, sex, child custody battles, unemployment, and rebound relationships post-divorce is hardly a movie with 5-year-olds as the intended target audience.

I see what you're doing and I get it...it just sucks as a good rhetoric.

You should keep reading my responses...

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
You don’t have the right to call anyone a retard, you literary think it’s ok for non certified educators like these drag queens to teach to kids.

This does not come anywhere close to a cogent argument.

"Guest speakers" and "guest teachers" are often invited to instruct and speak in schools to teach a very specific topic or impart a specific lesson to children. It is one of many different instruction tools effective and good teachers use to teach children.

It just so happens that you disagree with this particular teaching method and material which is definitely okay. I understand your passion for this topic and I feel where you're coming from. Beware of poorly thought out arguments and comparisons made in haste.

Originally posted by Robtard
You should keep reading my responses...

I did.

I don't understand what your additional responses have to do with the topic since the topic is Transvestites teaching transgenderism to 5 year olds.

Bring me up to your level with clarification because I'm not on your level.

That I don't agree with this happening to children of this age, it's unnecessary.

But I'm also not flipping out because I'm confident the parent's were informed before it happened and would have then had the option of opting their kid out of Drag Queen story time.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Mrs. Doubtfire, a movie with a rating of PG-13, that has adult themes in it such as divorce, sex, child custody battles, unemployment, and rebound relationships post-divorce is hardly a movie with 5-year-olds as the intended target audience.

I see what you're doing and I get it...it just sucks as a good rhetoric.

"Ms Doubtfire did it!" must mean its ok!😂

I speak from example and experience when I say this kind of environment can be very visibly detrimental and shape a child into something they don’t want to be. Sexual icons such as drag queens have NO place around children.

This is a very devastating blow from the left that seems innocent, but I assure you it is not.

It is simply a way of corrupting the minds of the innocent.

Originally posted by Robtard
That's what I also find humorous, some of the people who scream "indoctrination" the loudest over this story, have absolutely no problem with five year olds being schooled on religion.

What happens on Church is not what should happen on School which is exactly their point?

Originally posted by Robtard
Drag Queen
noun

-a man who dresses up in women's clothes, typically for the purposes of entertainment

So an entertainer read a book to children; this is what is making you tolerable people flip out and pearl-clutch. Legit lolz, never change.

lol @ "entertainer." Get em to juggle or ride a unicycle with the dress on and then you've got yourself a show.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
What qualifies them to be educators without any formal training?

By that logic you wouldn't get police to do talks at schools. Or fire fighters or sports representatives or whoever else isn't a qualified teacher.

Originally posted by Surtur
Actually wait I see the point now. The point has nothing to do with the kids...it's so the parents can virtue signal about how progressive their kids school is.

You've hit the nail on the head IMO. I'll go further though and suggest that this is about enraging certain people against other certain people, an incendiary topic designed to divide people.

Somebody mentioned that they were to be talking about transgenderism. What qualifies a cross-dresser to talk about this? That's like if Neil Patrick Harris came to your school to talk about being a teenage doctor when he never was one, he just played one for a few years.

Worth pointing out that kids have always been aware of transvestites (or Trannies, as we called them as kids.) and it never led to gender confusion with myself or any of the other kids in the vicinity, it was seen as comical and harmless. It would be like when those Hobbit kids are following Gandalf at the beginning of FOTR until he sets off the fireworks.

Also, don't know how old these potential children are but I'd be disappointed if my 7 year old had to learn about cross-dressers from their own school, I'd like to think that my children would already be aware of their existence because I'd get them to pay attention to society.

Originally posted by Bentley
What happens on Church is not what should happen on School which is exactly their point?

👆

Thank you.

Originally posted by samhain
You've hit the nail on the head IMO. I'll go further though and suggest that this is about enraging certain people against other certain people, an incendiary topic designed to divide people.

Somebody mentioned that they were to be talking about transgenderism. What qualifies a cross-dresser to talk about this? That's like if Neil Patrick Harris came to your school to talk about being a teenage doctor when he never was one, he just played one for a few years.

Worth pointing out that kids have always been aware of transvestites (or Trannies, as we called them as kids.) and it never led to gender confusion with myself or any of the other kids in the vicinity, it was seen as comical and harmless. It would be like when those Hobbit kids are following Gandalf at the beginning of FOTR until he sets off the fireworks.

Also, don't know how old these potential children are but I'd be disappointed if my 7 year old had to learn about cross-dressers from their own school, I'd like to think that my children would already be aware of their existence because I'd get them to pay attention to society.

When I was 6-7 I don't think I would have even understood what a drag queen was. I probably would have figured they were just really really ugly women.

Though yeah...if we are to believe the intent was to make the kids more tolerant towards drag queens, then merely having them read books to kids wouldn't accomplish that. They'd need to actively engage them on the subject of drag queens and acceptance for it to have any real impact.

In England my generation was brought up on reruns of Monty Python and The Two Ronnies, every other sketch had some guys wearing dresses.

7 yr. old me would then just associate drag queens with jokes, which they'd probably say was offensive lol.