Drag Queens being Brought to Public Schools to read to kids

Started by Surtur20 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
How many times do you need to be told that a Drag Queen isn't a transsexual?

A DQ is a man who dresses up in women's clothes and makeup (often exaggerated) for the purpose of entertaining. They're entertainers.

I don't need to be told it at all. Trannies ended up being discussed here too and I didn't feel like making a new thread.

Originally posted by Robtard
How many times do you need to be told that a Drag Queen isn't a transsexual?

A DQ is a man who dresses up in women's clothes and makeup (often exaggerated) for the purpose of entertaining. They're entertainers.

There is clearly an intersectionality that you fail to realize or are deliberately ignoring.

Originally posted by Eon Blue
There is clearly an intersectionality that you fail to realize or are deliberately ignoring.

Also, and here is Rob exposes what a yuge weasel he is, this topic contained tons of discussion about trannies. So to pretend like it's an implication drag queens are trannies is dishonest.

Almost like he's a dishonest actor, but wait he said he wasn't.

Originally posted by Surtur
Belongs here too I guess, for those who won't read the triggered thread:

Trans activists fail to block research suggesting gender dysphoria is 'contagious'


That makes no sense...

Originally posted by MythLord
That makes no sense...
Please guys avoid re-posting Surt my IQ drops every time I have to read one of his posts.

LOL! Still in his mind 24/7

Originally posted by MythLord
That makes no sense...

Looking forward to your scientific rebuttal. I myself can't make heads or tails, I do know it's gonna set folk off.

My scientific rebuttal is that it really makes no sense given that's not how dysphoria works. There's also the fact that the very article you linked says that it's just observational about how trans people usually are friends with other trans people and follow trans people on social media. Imagine that; a person who is unsure about their gender and may have dysphoria talking to and learning from people who've had the same exact experiences.

I'm not sure why there was such a fierce backlash, although that seems to be because there were initially implications that this was a "rapid-onset gender dysphoria" which the publishers then confirmed wasn't what they meant and changed that later. And now there isn't a backlash anymore?

What I'm saying is you're making a bigger deal about this than it really is. It's a limited study that ultimately says nothing about how dysphoria spreads.

Originally posted by MythLord
My scientific rebuttal is that it really makes no sense given that's not how dysphoria works. There's also the fact that the very article you linked says that it's just observational about how trans people usually are friends with other trans people and follow trans people on social media. Imagine that; a person who is unsure about their gender and may have dysphoria talking to and learning from people who've had the same exact experiences.

I'm not sure why there was such a fierce backlash, although that seems to be because there were initially implications that this was a "rapid-onset gender dysphoria" which the publishers then confirmed wasn't what they meant and changed that later. And now there isn't a backlash anymore?

What I'm saying is you're making a bigger deal about this than it really is. It's a limited study that ultimately says nothing about how dysphoria spreads.

Lol right, we're gonna explore the claim I'm making a big deal over it. Prior to your response, here is all I've written about it:

"Belongs here too I guess, for those who won't read the triggered thread"

"Ohh my the tears are gonna flow".

Not making a big deal. I did not post with "THIS F*CKING SCIENCE HAS SETTLED IT MOTHERF*CKERS!!!!!"

You falsely presented the article, which is what I take issue with. I know you just quoted the article's title, but your comments implied that it was a sort of "gotcha" moment.

So either you didn't read the article in it's entirety, or you simply thought someone would read the title and cry over it.

Originally posted by MythLord
My scientific rebuttal is that it really makes no sense given that's not how dysphoria works. There's also the fact that the very article you linked says that it's just observational about how trans people usually are friends with other trans people and follow trans people on social media. Imagine that; a person who is unsure about their gender and may have dysphoria talking to and learning from people who've had the same exact experiences.

I'm not sure why there was such a fierce backlash, although that seems to be because there were initially implications that this was a "rapid-onset gender dysphoria" which the publishers then confirmed wasn't what they meant and changed that later. And now there isn't a backlash anymore?

What I'm saying is you're making a bigger deal about this than it really is. It's a limited study that ultimately says nothing about how dysphoria spreads.

Bingo

Originally posted by MythLord
You falsely presented the article, which is what I take issue with. I know you just quoted the article's title, but your comments implied that it was a sort of "gotcha" moment.

So either you didn't read the article in it's entirety, or you simply thought someone would read the title and cry over it.

👆

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol right, we're gonna explore the claim I'm making a big deal over it. Prior to your response, here is all I've written about it:

"Belongs here too I guess, for those who won't read the triggered thread"

"Ohh my the tears are gonna flow".

Not making a big deal. I did not post with "THIS F*CKING SCIENCE HAS SETTLED IT MOTHERF*CKERS!!!!!"

👆