Was the research paper hoax wrong?

Started by Putinbot14 pages

Originally posted by Surtur
I do enjoy seeing people twist themselves into pretzels over JP.
makes me laugh that people imagine things.

Another fact

Still, only 36 percent of Americans hold a valid passport, according to the State Department, compared to 60 percent of passport-holding Canadians and 75 percent for Brits and Aussies. That means almost 70 percent of you are unqualified for international travel.

More lobster talk

Originally posted by Robtard
More lobster talk
The guys biology is terrible, he doesn't understand the difference between diverged and developed.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
makes me laugh that people imagine things.

Another fact

Still, only 36 percent of Americans hold a valid passport, according to the State Department, compared to 60 percent of passport-holding Canadians and 75 percent for Brits and Aussies. That means almost 70 percent of you are unqualified for international travel.

Just got my passport renewed, I'm part of the top elitist 36% and I do smugly look down on those plebs beneath me, like Surt 👆

Originally posted by Putinbot1
The guys biology is terrible, he doesn't understand the difference between diverged and developed.

Does he not have access to a copy of Oxford's dict?

Originally posted by Robtard
Just got my passport renewed, I'm part of the top elitist 36% and I do smugly look down on those plebs beneath me, like Surt 👆
Haha,I would imagine the number in Surts circumstances having a passport is far lower than 36 percent. Not saying he hasn't I have no way on knowing that. 😖hifty:

Originally posted by Robtard
Does he not have access to a copy of Oxford's dict?
he is out by at least 150 million years probably more on when man and lobsters had a common ancestor.

What's a 150million years. Do lobsters even clean their rooms?

Originally posted by Robtard
What's a 150million years. Do lobsters even clean their rooms?
this is true, what it means though is a lobsters nervous system has little resemblance to our own. For **** sake the brain has almost none of the same structures.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Yeah but no,

https://amp.businessinsider.com/silicon-valley-parents-raising-their-kids-tech-free-red-flag-2018-2

Silicon Valley parents can see firsthand, either through living or working in the Bay Area, that technology is potentially harmful to kids.
Many parents are now restricting, or outright banning, screen time for their children.
The trend follows a long-standing practice among high-level tech executives who have set limits for their own children for years.

You just said...

Data is automated, you realise the top high schools in silicon valley no longer teach programming or ICT because they believe both are becoming simpler and more intuitive.

Which is not the same point at all as parents raising their small children without a very small set of tech because they are "woke" parents? Right?

You do realize you're now talking about something completely different, right? 🙂

Originally posted by Putinbot1
https://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/2015/dec/02/schools-that-ban-tablets-traditional-education-silicon-valley-london

technology
Parents working in Silicon Valley are sending their children to a school where there’s not a computer in sight – and they’re not alone

And lots of other info out there.

No, his credentials are fine it's fitting evidence to fit a hypothesis which is inherently flawed and using those credentials to lend credibility.

So your original point was just ONE school in Silicon valley, a private school, who has a very specific teaching method, is doing this?

Well, now that's different. You can find fringe schools like these all over, not just in Silicon Valley.

Also, it's convenient that you've shifted the topic from having programming and app-dev courses in schools to having technology in schools. Amazing! 🙂

Originally posted by Putinbot1
makes me laugh that people imagine things.

Another fact

Still, only 36 percent of Americans hold a valid passport, according to the State Department, compared to 60 percent of passport-holding Canadians and 75 percent for Brits and Aussies. That means almost 70 percent of you are unqualified for international travel.

You're so mad and triggered over JP lol. It's the saddest, but funniest thing in the world.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
makes me laugh that people imagine things.

Another fact

Still, only 36 percent of Americans hold a valid passport, according to the State Department, compared to 60 percent of passport-holding Canadians and 75 percent for Brits and Aussies. That means almost 70 percent of you are unqualified for international travel.

I remember this It's because the US has more of what people want to see and do than other places so many Americans travel hundreds of miles and are still in the US. 🙂

It's great to be in the USA.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I remember this It's because the US has more of what people want to see and do than other places so many Americans travel hundreds of miles and are still in the US. 🙂

It's great to be in the USA.

'Murica is #1

Originally posted by dadudemon
You just said...

Which is not the same point at all as parents raising their small children without a very small set of tech because they are "woke" parents? Right?

You do realize you're now talking about something completely different, right? 🙂

So your original point was just ONE school in Silicon valley, a private school, who has a very specific teaching method, is doing this?

Well, now that's different. You can find fringe schools like these all over, not just in Silicon Valley.

Also, it's convenient that you've shifted the topic from having programming and app-dev courses in schools to having technology in schools. Amazing! 🙂

no I said they are sending there kids to school with no ICT lessons see Guardian article. Same as said before nothing different being argued. Reason same as before because tech is more intuitive. I know you put a lot of stock in IT DDM, but it's getting so easy to use and program that the basics are far more important. As they have always been and always will be. Computer tech apart from hardware which is electronics, robotics etc is becoming short course stuff. The other sciences are getting harder but the computers which support simple data crunching are easy to use. Which makes sense because data crunching is boring as hell and usually unless you are dealing with massaging data boring as hell. Although the predictions generated may be fun as may the results. Spin it how you want, it is what it is.

Originally posted by Surtur
You're so mad and triggered over JP lol. It's the saddest, but funniest thing in the world.
really no, but you have cognitive dissonance that one of your heroes hasn't a clue about evolution from the factual point of view.

He is the uneducated man's smart man as often stated even by his peers.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
no I said they are sending there kids to school with no ICT lessons see Guardian article. Same as said before nothing different being argued. Reason same as before because tech is more intuitive. I know you put a lot of stock in IT DDM, but it's getting so easy to use and program that the basics are far more important. As they have always been and always will be. Computer tech apart from hardware which is electronics, robotics etc is becoming short course stuff. The other sciences are getting harder but the computers which support simple data crunching are easy to use. Which makes sense because data crunching is boring as hell and usually unless you are dealing with massaging data boring as hell. Although the predictions generated may be fun as may the results. Spin it how you want, it is what it is.

Yes, I'm aware that you're wrong and tried to change the topic to another wrong point. No need to rehash how out of touch you are with reality.

Meanwhile, in reality, children are being sent to coding camps, robotics classes, machine learning classes, and Vo-Tech schools instead of the more traditional forms of education. 👆

Originally posted by dadudemon
Yes, I'm aware that you're wrong and tried to change the topic to another wrong point. No need to rehash how out of touch you are with reality.

Meanwhile, in reality, children are being sent to coding camps, robotics classes, machine learning classes, and Vo-Tech schools instead of the more traditional forms of education. 👆

all those things happen even in the third world, however as you've had proven to you by fact. The best schools in Silicon Valley don't.

Because it's all getting easier to use. In fact computers even program themselves more and more.

You may not like it DDM but IT and humans will be going their separate ways more and more. The latest chess computer even taught itself to play and plays not like a machine but like a super human. Learning algorithms will make many kinds of coding redundant in a sweep and make machines easier for humans to interact with. I hope it's not too quick so you have a job in 20 years.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
all those things happen even in the third world, however as you've had proven to you by fact.

And isn't that wonderful?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
The best schools in Silicon Valley don't.

You mean one private school that rich yuppies send their children to which has no technology programs and is setting their children up for failure in the tech industry, doesn't? Right, I know. Bet you some of these parents are anti-vaxxers, too. That's the type that does this type of idiotic and close-minded thing.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Because it's all getting easier to use. In fact computers even program themselves more and more.

The opposite is true. Why do you state all these false things left and right? Technology is becoming more and more prohibitively complicated and nuanced as time goes on. They predict that in the future, humans will not be able to manage technology anymore and will require the interfacing and development of technology through AI Brokers. We will need to provide an abstracted input or interface and have the AI brokers make the changes/updates.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
You may not like it DDM but IT and humans will be going their separate ways more and more.

The opposite is true. I like it and it is why I work in this industry. 🙂 But it seems you don't like it which is why you seem to have a weird obsession with "not technology" and old-school (pun intended) education methods.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
The latest chess computer even taught itself to play and plays not like a machine but like a super human.

And irrelevant point. But okay.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Learning algorithms will make many kinds of coding redundant in a sweep and make machines easier for humans to interact with.

You mean machine learning. And you mean it will become harder and harder for humans to innovate (how it is in reality) without highly specialized skills that traditional education methods cannot provide.

What I'm talking about is reality. My professional network is saturated with leaders and recruiters needing to fill positions with people who don't exist. The industry is desperate and all of these positions pay six figures even with 2-3 years of experience and semi-related fields.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
I hope it's not too quick so you have a job in 20 years.

I'll be fine. I'll be one of the last types of humans who still have jobs. Someone has to transition the rest of humans. That's me. 😄

But I have noted that you've just done a "no u" reply.

Putin getting wrecked again. Holy shit dude why do you even engage DDM? It never ends well for you lol.

How many times must you get burned before you respect fire?

Originally posted by dadudemon
And isn't that wonderful?

You mean one private school that rich yuppies send their children to which has no technology programs and is setting their children up for failure in the tech industry, doesn't? Right, I know. Bet you some of these parents are anti-vaxxers, too. That's the type that does this type of idiotic and close-minded thing.

The opposite is true. Why do you state all these false things left and right? Technology is becoming more and more prohibitively complicated and nuanced as time goes on. They predict that in the future, humans will not be able to manage technology anymore and will require the interfacing and development of technology through AI Brokers. We will need to provide an abstracted input or interface and have the AI brokers make the changes/updates.

The opposite is true. I like it and it is why I work in this industry. 🙂 But it seems you don't like it which is why you seem to have a weird obsession with "not technology" and old-school (pun intended) education methods.

And irrelevant point. But okay.

You mean machine learning. And you mean it will become harder and harder for humans to innovate (how it is in reality) without highly specialized skills that traditional education methods cannot provide.

What I'm talking about is reality. My professional network is saturated with leaders and recruiters needing to fill positions with people who don't exist. The industry is desperate and all of these positions pay six figures even with 2-3 years of experience and semi-related fields.

I'll be fine. I'll be one of the last types of humans who still have jobs. Someone has to transition the rest of humans. That's me. 😄

But I have noted that you've just done a "no u" reply.

I see, I touched a nerve everything you say is opinion. Interestingly, as I've shown a lot of experts disagree with you. You are right on one point though it gets harder for humans to innovate which means the number doing it becomes much fewer and as the pool of people involved spreads the indicator will be maths. Most of these people are doing there best work younger and younger below 25 and most did not learn to code at school and never will, all of them are very good at maths. Like I said I hope you still have a job in 20 years mate. You'll only be a young man then like I am now.