Federal Judge Lifts Transgender Troop Injuction

Started by Zucc3 pages
Zucc Restricted

I agree with the trans ban here.

Have to draw a line within some institutions. The problem with trans people, gays and other weirdos outlier-minorities is that when people start to accept them in society the try to change the standards, norms and rules to suit their frivolous wants and worldveiws. We see this with SJW's today trying to pass off ingrained gender differences as "social constructs" just becuase they've been given a bit of power within education among other institutes. So it's better to just straight up ban Trannies from serving before they try and divert and time and resources from military to make them feel more at home.

dadudemon Senior Member
Originally posted by snowdragon
Hmm interesting that you focused on the field when I also mentioned desk jobs.

Interesting that you brought up desk jobs and diabetics when my post started with the following:

Feels like an old-holdout from yesteryear when it was hard to care for a diabetic...

Because an insulin pump could certainly serve a desk jockey quite well but not a field operative crawling through the jungle or sand for days.

estahuh

Edit - I'm being a dick.

BrolyBCuck Restricted

.

Adam_PoE Senior Member

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
It’s not bigotry it’s a mental illness. Instead of treating a mental illness the left wants to embrace mid evil procedures that care irreversibly harm people because of the mental illness.

Also you want to inform science and say feelings>Biology

Dude, you don't know anything about mental illness or the diagnostic criteria. Please stop commenting on things you have no idea about.

Putinbot1 Restricted

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Dude, you don't know anything about mental illness or the diagnostic criteria. Please stop commenting on things you have no idea about.
he might, he was in the army Adam, who knows what he saw or experienced. Broly has been in self admitted bad places so... he might know.

Emperordmb LSDMB

Honestly that's why I'm refraining from commenting on this. I'm not expert enough in this area.

Putinbot1 Restricted

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Honestly that's why I'm refraining from commenting on this. I'm not expert enough in this area.
Me neither my dad was a soldier before working as a diplomat but he said it was something he hated, many of my family including my youngest served, but not in America. I have no diagnoses mental health issue... ha and I'm no expert on the different types.

dadudemon Senior Member
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Dude, you don't know anything about mental illness or the diagnostic criteria. Please stop commenting on things you have no idea about.

I hope my input can help with this conversation.

See my previous post and follow-up clarification:

Originally posted by dadudemon
According to the DSM-5, yes [Gender Dysphoria is a pathology] .

Page 451:
https://www.psikolojiagi.com/wp-content/uploads/Y%C3%BCklemeler/E-Kitaplar/DSM%20-%20V%20(English).pdf

The APA also cautions against labeling all transgendered with a pathology:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225591/

In particular, there is a danger that a term that is now the name of a specific diagnosable psychiatric disorder may simultaneously be applied to individuals, populations, or experiences that do not meet diagnostic criterion and that, according to the APA, should not be considered pathological.
Putinbot1 Restricted

Originally posted by dadudemon
I hope my input can help with this conversation.

See my previous post and follow-up clarification:

The APA also cautions against labeling all transgendered with a pathology:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225591/

That makes sense.

Putinbot1 Restricted

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Me neither my dad was a soldier before working as a diplomat but he said it was something he hated, many of my family including my youngest served, but not in America. I have no diagnoses mental health issue... ha and I'm no expert on the different types.
Clarfication youngest of my first 2.

S_W_LeGenD Senior Member

Originally posted by -Pr-
Why do people not want transgender troops in the first place?

A transgender individual will identify as male [or] female, but is not physically; the stress of living in a body that is not 'right' can take its toll. Therefore, a transgender individual might not be fit to serve unless his/her body issues are adequately addressed (surgical interventions and affiliated costs).

Body insecurities can affect morale and/or 'presence of mind' in the battlefield; not recommended. Military is no place for this nonsense.

Adam_PoE Senior Member

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
A transgender individual will identify as male [or] female, but is not physically; the stress of living in a body that is not 'right' can take its toll. Therefore, a transgender individual might not be fit to serve unless his/her body issues are adequately addressed (surgical interventions and affiliated costs).

Body insecurities can affect morale and/or 'presence of mind' in the battlefield; not recommended. Military is no place for this nonsense.

Cool story. The militaries of 20 developed nations, including our own Department of Defense, would argue otherwise.

S_W_LeGenD Senior Member

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Cool story. The militaries of 20 developed nations, including our own Department of Defense, would argue otherwise.

Acceptance does not imply that the underlying problems do not exist. I just pointed out the obvious.

It is up to you to decide how you run an organization. Whether you are doing a better job at it, or taking greater risks then others, is the point.