A quarter of Americans are Involuntarily Celibate

I'd say we should aim for the 50% of male population that cannot get laid. Sex should be a scarce rare occasion that people should pretty much take for lost since the get to go. That way they'd get less frustrated.

To reach this goal we must outlaw music and fiction about love and mating, every other topic like constructing pieces of machinery and teaching parrots how to talk should take its place. There should be tons of female and male interaction, but any kind of sexual advance should weird out characters and finally everyone should always agree that being just friends is better.

We should also get better sex education and a better establishment for prostitution, to aid deviants that are still victims of their biology. It'd be considered a handicap labelled sexual deviant and they'd have an assigned prostitute and a therapists that would eventually diminsh their need for sex.

Originally posted by Bentley
I'd say we should aim for the 50% of male population that cannot get laid. Sex should be a scarce rare occasion that people should pretty much take for lost since the get to go. That way they'd get less frustrated.

To reach this goal we must outlaw music and fiction about love and mating, every other topic like constructing pieces of machinery and teaching parrots how to talk should take its place. There should be tons of female and male interaction, but any kind of sexual advance should weird out characters and finally everyone should always agree that being just friends is better.

We should also get better sex education and a better establishment for prostitution, to aid deviants that are still victims of their biology. It'd be considered a handicap labelled sexual deviant and they'd have an assigned prostitute and a therapists that would eventually diminsh their need for sex.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
I can't see the size of the sample group, who carried the study out, nature of selection etc. For data to be worth anything, it needs those. Otherwise, it's just h1a8 maths. It doesnt rven say wjo carried out the research.

Click the link and answer your own questions.

Or better yet, use google search to find similar studies down with OKCupid.

You're not stupid. Feigning ignorance doesn't suit you. 🙂

I brought you to the water, it's up to you to drink.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Just let them read alt-right ideas, women won't go near them.

If you actually mean alt-right, then I'd agree with you for the most part. There are alt-right women, so essentially they'd be stuck with a much much much smaller pool of women with the vast majority of women outright rejecting them.

If you're mistakenly referring to the ideas of someone like myself, or Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, or Steven Crowder as alt-right, well, let's just say my current romantic interest shares my views and watches all three of them.

I honestly feel like getting involved with any sort of political ideology (other than the specifically male groups like mra/mgtow/etc) is a great in-road to meet passionate (if somewhat brainwashed) women. Even ISIS has female recruits ffs.

So are a quarter of Americans simply haven't had casual sex in a year? That's not a big deal.

If 25% of young Americans were virgins, now that would be a problem.

You guys simply have to work harder.

Originally posted by mike brown
I honestly feel like getting involved with any sort of political ideology (other than the specifically male groups like mra/mgtow/etc) is a great in-road to meet passionate (if somewhat brainwashed) women. Even ISIS has female recruits ffs.

honestly this is entirely correct lol

i'm a leftist activist irl and dude the amount of women in there is insane 🙂

Originally posted by gold slorg
honestly this is entirely correct lol

i'm a leftist activist irl and dude the amount of women in there is insane 🙂

Originally posted by dadudemon
Not really. It's based on real-world data.

https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a

Online dating sucks. Almost all the women are liars. They are almost all fat or take overwhelmingly flattering pictures. Every now and then, you find a great one, though. 🙂

"This study was conducted to quantify the Tinder socio-economic prospects for males based on the percentage of females that will “like” them. Female Tinder usage data was collected and statistically analyzed to determine the inequality in the Tinder economy. It was determined that the bottom 80% of men (in terms of attractiveness) are competing for the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are competing for the top 20% of men. The Gini coefficient for the Tinder economy based on “like” percentages was calculated to be 0.58. This means that the Tinder economy has more inequality than 95.1% of all the world’s national economies. In addition, it was determined that a man of average attractiveness would be “liked” by approximately 0.87% (1 in 115) of women on Tinder. Also, a formula was derived to estimate a man’s attractiveness level based on the percentage of “likes” he receives on Tinder:"

How does this even make sense.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
It depends on what you mean when you say alt-right.

If you actually mean alt-right, then I'd agree with you for the most part. There are alt-right women, so essentially they'd be stuck with a much much much smaller pool of women with the vast majority of women outright rejecting them.

If you're mistakenly referring to the ideas of someone like myself, or Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, or Steven Crowder as alt-right, well, let's just say my current romantic interest shares my views and watches all three of them.

You already are 100% aware of what he means by "alt right" lol.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
"This study was conducted to quantify the Tinder socio-economic prospects for males based on the percentage of females that will “like” them. Female Tinder usage data was collected and statistically analyzed to determine the inequality in the Tinder economy. It was determined that the bottom 80% of men (in terms of attractiveness) are competing for the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are competing for the top 20% of men. The Gini coefficient for the Tinder economy based on “like” percentages was calculated to be 0.58. This means that the Tinder economy has more inequality than 95.1% of all the world’s national economies. [b]In addition, it was determined that a man of average attractiveness would be “liked” by approximately 0.87% (1 in 115) of women on Tinder. Also, a formula was derived to estimate a man’s attractiveness level based on the percentage of “likes” he receives on Tinder:"

How does this even make sense. [/B]

It doesn't.

In a normal expected behavior, you'd see a 5 out of 10 attract around 50% of the female population. A 10 out of 10 would attract nearly 100% of the population.

Even in a worst case scenario, you'd see the 1s and 2s attracted to the 5s and see 20% of the population liking 5s.

But that's just not how it works in the real world. The average men are being liked by very very few women.

However, in the male-to-female liking situations, you see the mean matching expected normal behaviors. It follows more logically. Women like to punch above their attractiveness all the time, it seems. 5s go after 10s. All the time.

Here's the problem: men will give them a chance. They are not as picky or selective.

It sucks for most men. lol

If you are a 10 what are the chances you get with a 10 female then, do you know those numbers?

Based on these numbers is it 10% I bet it could even be lower.

So if only 5-10% of the 10's that are females would like a male that would be considered a 10. Who is getting the 10's that are females then?

This is fascinating to say the least.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
^^This reeks of bro-sociology, tho

That is because it is one of the fundamental beliefs of incels.

I've seen plenty of physically average (or below) men get hot women; women that most people would say "are above their belt", all of them had two things in common, confidence in themselves and lacked the creep factor (incel factor in today's parlance?)

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
The topic is [B]involuntary celibacy. (Involuntary is when you have no choice. JFC)

really? [/B]

Elaborate?

is it not possible that maybe online dating apps aren't the best reflection of irl dating?

I mean women still have more selection power irl but the gender ratios on apps like tinder probably magnify that dynamic quite a bit.

I'd probably take Tinder data with a grain of salt when comparing it to relationships. After all, Tinder is catered to the one night stand crowd (unless this has changed?), which likely means people are either being far pickier or far more loose with their choices compared to potential long term relationships.

Originally posted by mike brown
is it not possible that maybe online dating apps aren't the best reflection of irl dating?

I mean women still have more selection power irl but the gender ratios on apps like tinder probably magnify that dynamic quite a bit.

I had a girl once that wanted a diamond bracelet on the first date. I laughed my ass off and went on my way.