Thanos vs Hela

Originally posted by h1a8
My argument is for those who don't believe we all use only a character's high end feats when arguing for them.

Also you used a low showing for Thanos (he actually wasn't damaged when Hulk struck him). Unless you want to argue it's a high showing for Iron man and not a low one for Thanos.

See, you once again said "only". there is a rather large difference between using high end feats and only using high end feats.

Originally posted by Silent Master
See, you once again said "only". there is a rather large difference between using high end feats and only using high end feats.

Originally posted by FrothByte
If you're asking me to prove Hela can heal a limitless amount, you're assuming that Thanos can hit her an unlimited amount.

Originally posted by h1a8
There is a difference. My argument is the "only" for the character a member is arguing to win.

An argument you've never been able to prove.

Originally posted by h1a8
There is a difference. My argument is the "only" for the character a member is arguing to win.

You're making this way more complicated than it should be. Just use high showings unless there are enough other showings that constantly contradict it. The end.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Thanos doesn't hit as strong as Thor's lightning blasts. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure Hela hits harder than IM. Face it Quan, Thanos loses this fight.

Thanos beat the stuffing out of the Hulk Thor has yet to do so despite two fights and multiple weapons to boot.

Originally posted by quanchi112
She did not heal from Surtur on Asgard so we see she has limits thus disproving your claim.

Yeah. The literal only way to kill her killed her.

Thor got hit against Hulk.

Originally posted by KingD19
Yeah. The literal only way to kill her killed her.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor got hit against Hulk.

So?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Based off what? Thor cut into her with inferior weaponry. Thor himself admitted without his best weapon he has no shot against Thanos. All the damage prior led into the cut not just Iron man. The directors confirm this in the commentary. Your inability to grasp what is going in is astounding.

Thanos beat the stuffing out of the Hulk Thor has yet to do so despite two fights and multiple weapons to boot.

Thor cut into her with Gungnir. That is not inferior weaponry.

Thor admitted he didn't have a shot against Thanos with the IG. He doesn't have it in this match

So all the damage done to Thanos all over his body accumulated to result in a cut on the cheek? So I can punch a guy 10 times in the gut and that will result in them getting cut in the cheek?

Thor is not the one Thanos is fighting in this match. It's Hela.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, at her greatest power since she was beaten. Easily. Surtur trounced her despite her trying so hard. She utterly failed. Thanos would maul this one nite villain.

Holdup. You're saying Thanos w/o the IG can take on fully grown Surtur?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Thor cut into her with Gungnir. That is not inferior weaponry.

Thor admitted he didn't have a shot against Thanos [b]with the IG. He doesn't have it in this match

So all the damage done to Thanos all over his body accumulated to result in a cut on the cheek? So I can punch a guy 10 times in the gut and that will result in them getting cut in the cheek?

Thor is not the one Thanos is fighting in this match. It's Hela. [/B]

He fought him without Thanos using it and still lost despite a cheapshot.

Directors verified it. If you get hit me hundred times your body is not fresh as a daisy you nitwit.

The girl unable to beat Thor. Yeah, Thanos did so easily and without even really trying. She is in over her head. These are not weak asgardians this is the guy who has superior strength and skill to her. He beats the stuffing out of her.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Holdup. You're saying Thanos w/o the IG can take on fully grown Surtur?

Originally posted by FrothByte
You're making this way more complicated than it should be. Just use high showings unless there are enough other showings that constantly contradict it. The end.

Originally posted by Silent Master
An argument you've never been able to prove.

I been posting evidence when some do it. And will continue.

No, you haven't.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, you haven't.

I just did. You replied to it.

No, your argument was people only use high end feats for people they want to win. Froth's quote doesn't say to only use them for one side.

Try again.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, your argument was people only use high end feats for people they want to win. Froth's quote doesn't say to only use them for one side.

Try again.

People don't consistently use them for both sides, just for one side (the for character). Some highball lowball troll.

Originally posted by h1a8
People don't consistently use them for both sides, just for one side (the for character). Some highball lowball troll.

Other than you, post some examples.