Eric Swalwell Suggested Nuking the country in order to take guns away.

Don’t be so dramatic. No one is nuking anyone or threatening that. I’m telling you this is not the 18th Century. The argument that you would go to war with your government if an assault weapons ban was in place is ludicrous and inflames the gun debate. Which is what you want.

-Eric

napalm and a few hillbilly bunker-busters would do the trick. shame about the trees though

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Don’t be so dramatic. No one is nuking anyone or threatening that. I’m telling you this is not the 18th Century. The argument that you would go to war with your government if an assault weapons ban was in place is ludicrous and inflames the gun debate. Which is what you want.

-Eric

Cleanup on aisle 3

Remember Waco. The last thing the government would want in a bunkered down situation, is that outcome.

But if we're talking a real civil war, the pro gun side would probably resort to asymmetrical warfare, which works, provided the government doesn't go scorched earth (They'd stop being a legitimate government if they did, imo.)

All the liberals who think the government would automatically win don’t know a thing about combat. Do I need to remind people about Iraq and Afghan?

Your South would lose more heavily than you did in the last civil war you had.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Your South would lose more heavily than you did in the last civil war you had.

I think the South and North both lost, hard.

To corporate America, and their federal patrons.

Originally posted by cdtm
I think the South and North both lost, hard.

To corporate America, and their federal patrons.

YouTube video

All the liberals who think the government would automatically win don’t know a thing about combat. Do I need to remind people about Iraq and Afghan?

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Yes. Please remind us.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
The north and California will always be the better parts of the US.

Friends of friends who visited CT claimed people seemed more down to earth, compared to Cali.

All of my CT friends jaws dropped in astonishment and disbelief, mine included.

Not a North vs South, but i would NOT put CT people above anyone.

How did this-

"So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get. You’re outta your ****ing mind if you think I’ll give up my rights and give the gov all the power." - joe biggs

"And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities." - eric swalwell

Turn into this?-

"Eric Swalwell Suggested Nuking the country in order to take guns away."- Broly

Originally posted by Raptor22
How did this-

"So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get. You’re outta your ****ing mind if you think I’ll give up my rights and give the gov all the power." - joe biggs

"And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities." - eric swalwell

Turn into this?-

"Eric Swalwell Suggested Nuking the country in order to take guns away."- Broly

What do you feel Swalwell meant when he mentioned nukes, why bring that up?

And if some Republican said the same thing, but about illegal immigrants...how do you feel the democrats would respond?

Originally posted by Raptor22
How did this-

"So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get. You’re outta your ****ing mind if you think I’ll give up my rights and give the gov all the power." - joe biggs

"And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities." - eric swalwell

Turn into this?-

"Eric Swalwell Suggested Nuking the country in order to take guns away."- Broly

^Legit 5 minutes ago knowingly took someone out of context. Top notch stuff. I love it.

Originally posted by Surtur
What do you feel Swalwell meant when he mentioned nukes, why bring that up?

And if some Republican said the same thing, but about illegal immigrants...how do you feel the democrats would respond?

Thats a far cry from - "Eric Swalwell Suggested Nuking the country in order to take guns away."- Broly

Do u think what eric said is the same as that?

If a Republican said that im sure alot of dems would make a shit storm out of it like peeps are doing now. They'd be just a idiotic as the people doing it now are.

Originally posted by Raptor22
How did this-

"So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get. You’re outta your ****ing mind if you think I’ll give up my rights and give the gov all the power." - joe biggs

"And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities." - eric swalwell

Turn into this?-

"Eric Swalwell Suggested Nuking the country in order to take guns away."- Broly

Special trumper feelings

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Special trumper feelings

Originally posted by Raptor22
he probably meant that there was a chance they could be used if peace talks didnt work and common ground couldn't be reached and part of the country declared war on the government/rest of country like that joe guy threatened.

Thats a far cry from - "Eric Swalwell Suggested Nuking the country in order to take guns away."- Broly

Do u think what eric said is the same as that?

If a Republican said that im sure alot of dems would make a shit storm out of it like peeps are doing now. They'd be just a idiotic as the people doing it now are.

If peace talks can’t be reached nuking the country over a 2nd amendment right totally seems reasonable.