Originally posted by FrothByte
Not all energy is the same. You honestly think it's a good idea to block a lightning strike with a metal weapon? lol.
Prove it is an earthly metal weapon. His lightning even powers up Iron mans suit. If you are going to make a claim please prove it. You just continue the baseless claims.
In any case, Thanos got shot by lightning 3 times and in none of those times was he able to block it. So if you want to claim he can do so, please provide some feats.
[/B]
And yet none of those were instances of him brunt even critically injured. Your claim this defeats him is absurd since he went on to impose his will in all instances.
I am not arguing he is untouchable I am arguing if he does get hit which he has by the lightning it will not be enough to defeat him. This is factually correct your case is based on your own baseless stance being accepted while ignoring the result of their fights on screen.
Provide examples of Thor using lightning to defeat someone impressive. If you cannot cite any examples then you are about as effective as joshs hilarious and dubious headcanon stances.
Possibly. At the very least, a prolonged lightning blast or repeated blasts should severely hurt and weaken Thanos considering even a single hit already had him squirming on the ground.
[/B]
So his actions after said blasts do not lead you to believe he was fine? Did you see what he did to Cap after? Why do you ignore the end result in favor of your desperate headcanon. Thanos countered. He was not damaged in the slightest evident by his prolonged fight afterwards while incurring a lot more damage than fodder lightning.
A jab doesn't usually knock an opponent off his feet. A better comparison would be a right cross, and a right cross powerful enough to knock you down with a single hit is not something you can take repeated hits from. Especially not when you have no feats of being able to block it.
[/B]
it is not a literal comparison but it fits your criteria. Thors lightning is not as powerful as his weapons. We see Thor and hulk knock each other at great distances in their fight in Ragnarok but at that point neither guy was able to hurt them significantly. Thanos beat the hulk soundly but just because the director did not choose to have him fly back 30 feet we do not ignore what causes actual significant damage. Thanos soundly defeated the hulk Thor did not.
We do not ignore the clear intention of Thor and cap trying as hard as they can to defeat Thanos and that both were unable to do so. They gas skill, weapons, and lightning yet both lost.
A pinch doesn't knock you off your feet. Please use a bit of common sense. Name me one type of hit that can knock you down with a single hit yet won't hurt you and that you can take repeated hits from.
[/B]
I did not say it does. A push could. I could keep getting up. You are trying to compare humans to characters who can resist stars, lol. The lightning never did any significant damage to Thanos. Thanos beat them both.
Cap isn't Thor. Cap is a complete newb with his lightning powers and doesn't have a 10th of the lightning feats that Thor has.
[/B]
Cap used the hammer and shield like a pro. Yo act as if he was getting used to his powers while seeing him wield them is akin to trolling.
Cap used the shield and hammer in tandem and showed he was a fierce and a competent wielder of his powers. Cap is combat ready. Thor has more feats because he held the hammer longer but Cap was competent and quite impressive wielding the hammer. If he did not know what he was doing how could he just summon lightning?
Again, Thanos is not Hela. Hela has an insane healing factor. You can't transfer feats between different characters that have very little in common.[/B]
So what? She cannot get up so based off your theory she can never resume her footing and her healing factor clearly has limits even on Asgard. Surtur.
And Thor almost killed Thanos in IW. If Thanos hadn't tucked tail and ran Thor would have killed him. This is IW Thor we're talking about, not Endgame Thor.Hela wore no armor. But she also has a healing factor that Thanos doesn't have. Thor had no issue piercing Thanos with Stormbreaker. [/B]
Thanos won. He could have killed him with the snap. He was not there to kill Thor. His goal was killing half the universe. Thors goal was to stop and kill him. He failed on both accounts. He admitted in the film.
Your josh like delusions are about as compelling as your imagination arguments. Not based off facts or reason no one takes your fanboyism seriously.
She was not naked. That is clearly protective covering or armor of some kind. Surtur has no issue killing her with one stab. Hela did not resist stormbreaker which is greater than mjolnir so who cares?
Hela went toe to toe with Thor and he survived just fine. Thanos was about to impale him with his own weapon. Thanos is just too skilled for Thor or Hela. Stronger, more durable, and greater experience. You can ignore the filmmakers opinions, the fights, the evidence but you just come off as another josh. Who I like more I will argue for.