Originally posted by FrothByte
You can't ask me to prove a negative. If you want to claim that being able to bench press 500 lbs automatically gives you the strength to break a 1 inch thick wooden board then you're the one who has to prove it.I don't think you understand how difficult it is to break a 1 inch thick wooden board. Try it sometime. Go grab your chopping board at home and try to break it with a single strike.
And how do you think Wanda broke Thanos' sword? She didn't slowly crush it with her TK, she [b]struck
it with her TK. Thus the comparison to striking strength is apt.Now, do you have any proof that Wanda is strong enough to counter Carol's flight strength or will you continue to dodge? [/B]
You are making a mistake. Although you can't prove a universal negative, you are claiming an existential negative (someone) which can and must be proven with a single example.
Even if you can't and we must accept your assertion without proof then this would imply that some person who can lift 300 tons can't necessarily break a 1in board and so forth. So in general, Carol can't necessarily break a 1in board with a headbutt.
See how stupid that is?
Anyway, just because you can't prove an universal negative does not make it true. Some things in fiction can't be proven. But evidence that leans more to one direction than not is what we go with. Otherwise most of the threads wouldn't go anywhere.
Ok. Let's say that you are right about Wanda striking the sword. Then she would kill Carol in one blow.