Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Oh, no I said that TOBA isn't equal to TOAA in POWER. And I said that TOBA needed a puppet to act through on the 616 plane.Albert asserted the reverse. And used interviews to bolster his stance.
So if you have scans supporting his stance, that TOBA = TOAA in power, and that TOBA doesn't need a puppet, then sure, his interviews are admissible, as they are backed up by comics. Implications? Nah. [B]I never argued that TOAA and TOBA weren't other sides of the coin
. I argued power levels, as TOAA doesn't need a puppet, but TOBA does. As my comic scans obviously are at odds with....whatever interviews Albert used, we can't use the interviews.You obviously don't know what's being argued. [/B]
Alberto asserts that TOBA is a mirror and that being a mirror implies equality. The writer makes a statement that supports Alberto's first assertion and Alberto's first assertion is supported by the book. Thus the statement should meet the guidelines for usage. The debatable part of whether TOAA and TOBA are equals in power is not addressed by the statement, therefore not making it a violation of the rules from the standpoint of writer making statement that is not supported in book.
Plus, you made a general, overarching statement that writer statements are inadmissible which apparently they are not. Their inadmissibility depends on factors. So your statement was inaccurate along with you not knowing the definition of "analogy".
Originally posted by Diesldude
馃槀 he thought he saw a chance to get you back at all those times you outsmarted him and it backfired. This is why people shouldn鈥檛 jump into other people鈥檚 arguments while having only read the latest post.
LOL. Is this another one of your accusations against me? At least you didn't take it to my pms this time.
Originally posted by TheHulkster
Alberto asserts that TOBA is a mirror and that being a mirror implies equality. The writer makes a statement that supports Alberto's first assertion and Alberto's first assertion is supported by the book. Thus the statement should meet the guidelines for usage. The debatable part of whether TOAA and TOBA are equals in power is not addressed by the statement, therefore not making it a violation of the rules from the standpoint of writer making statement that is not supported in book.Plus, you made a general, overarching statement that writer statements are inadmissible which apparently they are not. Their inadmissibility depends on factors. So your statement was inaccurate along with you not knowing the definition of "analogy".
My very first comment on the subject:
Note, however, that TOBA needs a host personality to function on the living plane. A constraint TOAA should never EVER have.
My second:
[quote]
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Yeah, no one has proven that TOBA = TOAA, apart from their names. It's like saying you'd get eye damage from a torch - then argue you'd also get damage from darkness, lol.
Albert's use of interviews was to support his statement that TOBA DIDN'T need a host to work through. This is not true - as my multiple scans showed. Thus, the book does not jive with the interview.
So it is not analogous at all to the thread you posted your Pr quote from - and as I said, the writer interview is not admissible
Originally posted by Diesldude
馃槀 he thought he saw a chance to get you back at all those times you outsmarted him and it backfired. This is why people shouldn鈥檛 jump into other people鈥檚 arguments while having only read the latest post.
You can always tell when Hulkster *thinks* he can catch me out - he ignores threads where he is dead wrong, and attempts to engage in threads where he thinks he has a chance......maybe it is an ego thing? I proved him wrong in several threads, and he just drops it and disappears. Then won't stop posting in the one thread until I beat him again.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
My very first comment on the subject:My second:
Albert's use of interviews was to support his statement that TOBA DIDN'T need a host to work through. This is not true - as my multiple scans showed. Thus, the book does not jive with the interview.
So it is not analogous at all to the thread you posted your Pr quote from - and as I said, the writer interview is not admissible
I wasn't comparing threads, I posted a quote. I made no analogy.
The book does jibe with the statement. He doesn't discuss whether or not TOBA needs a host or not.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
馃槀 See you're still calling me that name. A wise man once told me to let others believe what they wanna believe^ they are one and that they really equally in power because they are the same being.. both have to work 50/50 and 50+50 =100 which mean they really are one. the one above cannot erase the one below all. I don't make these things up my guy
He resorts to such name calling when he's struggling, which is often.
Originally posted by TheHulkster
I wasn't comparing threads, I posted a quote. I made no analogy.The book does jibe with the statement. He doesn't discuss whether or not TOBA needs a host or not.
Analogy = comparison.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/analogy
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/analogy
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/analogy
Pr's quote has nothing to do with this thread, as the circumstances are different.
Albert specifically discusses whether it needs a host or not.
Originally posted by TheHulkster
He resorts to such name calling when he's struggling, which is often.
Oh? I called him Bazie, as a reference to his previous username on here.
Originally posted by TheHulksterI pm鈥檇 you once and it was to say that a certain poster went to far by cursing your mom that time. You saw that as an accusation? Smh, who reads/ translates to you?
LOL. Is this another one of your accusations against me? At least you didn't take it to my pms this time.
Originally posted by Diesldude
I pm鈥檇 you once and it was to say that a certain poster went to far by cursing your mom that time. You saw that as an accusation? Smh, who reads/ translates to you?
You PMed me asking me if I reported a certain poster and then told me that that was uncalled for. You made no mention of anyone cursing anyone's mom. Your statement reads as if you were telling me that reporting this person was uncalled for. I searched the name you gave and it pulled up someone who hasn't posted since 2007. I had no idea what you were talking about.
Did you express this in the thread you reference? Was it closed or something? The DC fanboys here insulting player's families is nothing new.
Originally posted by TheHulksterlol someone insulted your mom, got banned. I asked if you reported him because what he said was uncalled for.
You PMed me asking me if I reported a certain poster and then told me that that was uncalled for. You made no mention of anyone cursing anyone's mom. Your statement reads as if you were telling me that reporting this person was uncalled for. I searched the name you gave and it pulled up someone who hasn't posted since 2007. I had no idea what you were talking about.Did you express this in the thread you reference? Was it closed or something? The DC fanboys here insulting player's families is nothing new.
I didn鈥檛 use his entire name because I thought you would know. My point wasn鈥檛 if you reported him or her, my point was that the insults to your mom were uncalled for. As per usual you misunderstood like the comics you read.
Originally posted by TheHulkster
You PMed me asking me if I reported a certain poster and then told me that that was uncalled for. You made no mention of anyone cursing anyone's mom. Your statement reads as if you were telling me that reporting this person was uncalled for. I searched the name you gave and it pulled up someone who hasn't posted since 2007. I had no idea what you were talking about.Did you express this in the thread you reference? Was it closed or something? The DC fanboys here insulting player's families is nothing new.
馃槀 You shouild've ignored his pms, dude is legitimately weird, How anybody take him serious is completely beyond me