Why does Harriet Tubman deserve to replace Andrew Jackson?

Originally posted by Stoic
So then that's exactly what should happen. She fought for people that were held captive like phucking animals, are you kidding right now? I'm not playing here. Jewish people went through 5 to 7 years of hell during the Holocaust, and they have shrines raised in the honor of their dead, while Black people went through over 300yrs of captivity as if they were someone's phucking Pitt Bull and are still going through it today, and you're actually asking why? You know what? Place yourself in the shoes of the people that were raped, forced to work, lynched, mutilated, divided, and all of the other shit that you've decided to either not give a shit about, or did not realize, and then perhaps you might see why the phuck she should be placed on currency. Christopher phucking Columbus was given major kudos for being an evil piece of shit, only to later be seen for what he really was. An embarrassment. And you question why she should be given proper respect? You ought to think carefully about your next words.

*boom*

Peddle that virtue signaling BS elsewhere. I don't care. I don't care if she personally ended slavery by herself and then time traveled into the future and killed Hitler.

Originally posted by Surtur
Peddle that virtue signaling BS elsewhere. I don't care. I don't care if she personally ended slavery by herself and then time traveled into the future and killed Hitler.

It's not BS nor is it virtue signaling. You people like to label things incorrectly as a means to dismiss then. Anyhow.

Tell me, since we're (unfortunately imo) going to have faces on our currency, why not replace Andrew Jackson with Harriet Tubman, considering she's the FAR better role model?

Stoic is on fire, he came in and dropped the mike, Boom Shakalack Rood boi!

Originally posted by Surtur
Because there is no valid reason to change our money from one person to the next. It'd be more valid to remove people from it entirely.

Re-read what you wrote here please. You said nothing, because in order for her to be placed on currency someone would have to be removed from it. That's really what it comes down to. Who was more important in American history, or would it have been better if she or anyone like her existed? Should Blacks still be wiping and licking ******* like some sub human animal like they were presented to be back in those twisted times?

Originally posted by Stoic
Re-read what you wrote here please. You said nothing, because in order for her to be placed on currency someone would have to be removed from it. That's really what it comes down to. Who was more important in American history, or would it have been better if she or anyone like her existed? Should Blacks still be wiping and licking ******* like some sub human animal like they were presented to be back in those twisted times?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Stoic is on fire, he came in and dropped the mike, Boom Shakalack Rood boi!

But he really didn't drop the mic lol. But because his response was to me you and Rob get triggered and pretend he did.

Originally posted by Robtard
It's not BS nor is it virtue signaling. You people like to label things incorrectly as a means to dismiss then. Anyhow.

Tell me, since we're (unfortunately imo) going to have faces on our currency, why not replace Andrew Jackson with Harriet Tubman, considering she's the FAR better role model?

Originally posted by Surtur
I give two shits what she did. She doesn't deserve to be on our currency, *nobody* does.

But we sure as hell shouldn't change it from one person to the next for some virtue signaling bullshit, and you know that's exactly what this is. She's black, she's a woman...her accomplishments are secondary to that fact.

So No: we should not give in to virtue signaling. Folk can carry around a picture of her in their pockets if they need a picture of her on them at all times so badly.

👆

Originally posted by Stoic
Re-read what you wrote here please. You said nothing, because in order for her to be placed on currency someone would have to be removed from it. That's really what it comes down to. Who was more important in American history, or would it have been better if she or anyone like her existed? Should Blacks still be wiping and licking ******* like some sub human animal like they were presented to be back in those twisted times?

Read what I say here: nobody should be on currency. Not Harriet, not anyone.

You wanna build them a shrine? Set up a Go Fund Me for a shrine to Harriet Tubman.

Originally posted by Surtur
But he really didn't drop the mic lol. But because his response was to me you and Rob get triggered and pretend he did.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
It's O.K. to be angry Surt, pats Surt on the head!

And likewise: it's okay to deflect from correct observations with claims of anger 👆

Originally posted by Surtur
And likewise: it's okay to deflect from correct observations with claims of anger 👆

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
👆

I mean..."the jews suffered!" Okay, what jews are on our money? They have shrines, neat. Give one to Harriet, I'm all for it. I won't pay for it, but if others wanna donate money for some sort of shrine to this woman they are free to do it.

And in a country where a certain side seems keen on downplaying the suffering of jews by constantly invoking the holocaust...invoking jews here may not be the best move.

Originally posted by Surtur
Peddle that virtue signaling BS elsewhere. I don't care. I don't care if she personally ended slavery by herself and then time traveled into the future and killed Hitler.

I know that you don't care. It's part of your culture not to care. You only care when it affects you.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Oh Surt! 😆

It's what you guys do lol. All the time. A correct observation is pointed out about your behavior(or Robs, or Bash) and then it's "you're salty" or "you're angry". It is wonderfully predictable ol' chap.

To be fair, occasional the word "meltdown" will be incorrectly used by you guys as well.

Originally posted by Surtur
It's what you guys do lol. All the time. A correct observation is pointed out about your behavior(or Robs, or Bash) and then it's "you're salty" or "you're angry". It is wonderfully predictable ol' chap.

To be fair, occasional the word "meltdown" will be incorrectly used by you guys as well.

Originally posted by Surtur
I mean..."the jews suffered!" Okay, what jews are on our money? They have shrines, neat. Give one to Harriet, I'm all for it. I won't pay for it, but if others wanna donate money for some sort of shrine to this woman they are free to do it.

And in a country where a certain side seems keen on downplaying the suffering of jews by constantly invoking the holocaust...invoking jews here may not be the best move.

The issue was about currency.

Originally posted by Stoic
I know that you don't care. It's part of your culture not to care. You only care when it affects you.

You invoked Jews and shrines to the holocaust. Lets go down this road: I find it hard to believe we don't have any memorials, shrines, museums, etc. dedicated to the victims of slavery.

Originally posted by Stoic
The issue was about currency.

And yet you inserted shrines to victims of the holocaust, go figure that such a thing would change the dynamics of the conversation.