End of Biased Internet Censorship?!

Originally posted by Surtur
So then why is it legal for twitter to ban anyone? It denies them access to Trump.

^ Red Herring.

The fish aside, I'm not on Twitter, never had an account, but I can see Trump's tweets whenever I want. America is great!

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Red Herring.

The fish aside, I'm not on Twitter, never had an account, but I can see Trump's tweets whenever I want. America is great!

But if people are owed access to Trump on twitter why is it okay for twitter to ban anyone? You haven't explained this.

Should it be illegal for twitter to ban anyone?

And you realize people he blocked could just log out and see his tweets, correct?

So again: should it be illegal for twitter to ban anyone?

If you can't understand that sometimes the President operates under different rules than a private citizen because that comes with the job, I don't know what to tell you.

Repeat, he's the President of every US citizen.

Originally posted by Robtard
If you can't understand that sometimes the President operates under different rules than a private citizen because that comes with the job, I don't know what to tell you.

So essentially you're okay with a corporation deciding who gets access to the president.

El oh El...oh leftists.

^ Another strawman victory.

So you're not okay with twitter being able to decide who gets access to Trump, and in fact agree it is wrong?

Say what you mean kid, don't be shy.

Self-soothe yourself over the fact that when the Dem wins in 2020, like Biden, Warren or Buttigeig, they won't be able to block all the Rightist trolls.

Though in reality, they all have thick skins and wouldn't rage over some mean comments online, because that comes with the job of Potus :0

Originally posted by Surtur
So you're not okay with twitter being able to decide who gets access to Trump, and in fact agree it is wrong?

Say what you mean kid, don't be shy.

Originally posted by Robtard
Self-soothe yourself over the fact that when the Dem wins in 2020, like Biden, Warren or Buttigeig, they won't be able to block all the Rightist trolls.

Though in reality, they all have thick skins and wouldn't rage over some mean comments online, because that comes with the job of Potus :0

If Warren had a thick skin she'd have never done her little DNA test debacle you clowns 😆

Originally posted by Robtard
The law disagrees. That's faulty logic, while someone without internet access may not have equal access to a President's words, they should be allowed the opportunity without being blocked.

The law doesn't disagree. The ruling was wrong. Twitter isn't a public forum.

Originally posted by Robtard
The law disagrees.

This is incorrect. The law does not disagree.

A group of old an out of touch justices disagreed and they are showing their disconnect from modern technology by thinking people deserve harass the president on his personal twitter account that he used for years before he was president. 🙂

They might have a point if he used an official PotUS Twitter account after taking office. 👆

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Red Herring.

The fish aside, I'm not on Twitter, never had an account, but I can see Trump's tweets whenever I want. America is great!

Which means you have fundamentally proven the Justices wrong on their ruling.

🙂

You understand that, right? You don't even have a Twitter account to get blocked by Trump. Yet, you can see his tweets just fine. 👆

Yup and if people wanna stand behind the ruling, technically it should be illegal for twitter to ban ANYONE lol.

The left would neeeeeeever accept that, but they sure as hell stayed silent over Trump being forced to unban people.

Originally posted by dadudemon
This is incorrect. The law does not disagree.

A group of old an out of touch justices disagreed and they are showing their disconnect from modern technology by thinking people deserve harass the president on his personal twitter account that he used for years before he was president. 🙂

They might have a point if he used an official PotUS Twitter account after taking office. 👆

Disagreed, when Trump became POTUS his personal Twitter became of the state since he uses it as a Presidential platform to reach the people.

Trump's not just tweeting about what he had for lunch or his favorite movies, he's using it for official business.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Which means you have fundamentally proven the Justices wrong on their ruling.

🙂

You understand that, right? You don't even have a Twitter account to get blocked by Trump. Yet, you can see his tweets just fine. 👆

Disagreed. See above.

Rob should it be illegal for twitter to ban people?

No, they're a private company.

(No, you don't have your little "gotcha!" here)

Originally posted by Robtard
No, they're a private company.

(No, you don't have you little "gotcha!" here)

So then you agree that people are indeed not owed access to his twitter account?

You cannot have it both ways lol.

The office of the POTUS is not a private company, it's the government and serves all citizens, not just Trump supporters, you pretending the rules are the same between the two will not change the fact that they are not.

You really need to decide if a private business has the right to refuse business to anyone for any reason or not, you can't have it both ways (like your sexuality).

Could Twitter legally ban Trump?