Originally posted by dadudemon
No, the real reason for Robtard is it is a ruling that goes against what Trump wanted and anything or any situation that pisses of Trump, Trumptards, or conservatards is amusing to him.It has nothing to do with he incorrect Supreme Court interpretations or his contradiction of how he thinks private social media companies should operate.
It's all about the lulz for him and owning Trump.
This is not correct, as noted, Trump will probably be president for only two more years and I have no problem with this same rule applying to whomever comes after. Becoming President comes with some personal sacrifices, if a person can't handle that, they shouldn't run for the office.
Originally posted by Robtard
This is not correct, as noted, Trump will probably be president for only two more years and I have no problem with this same rule applying to whomever comes after. Becoming President comes with some personal sacrifices, if a person can't handle that, they shouldn't run for the office.
Why should this just be a rule for the president?
Should your state senator be allowed to block you on twitter, Roberto?
Oh and, can twitter legally ban Trump?
Originally posted by dadudemon
At no point were any of those items discussed in the rulings. That's just some weird shit he made up.I found 0 evidence for what he was talking about. lol
Probably this: Presidential Records Act
the PRA changed the legal ownership of the official records of the President from private to public, and established a new statutory structure under which Presidents must manage their records. -snip
edit: Link should work now
Originally posted by Surtur
Why should this just be a rule for the president?Should your state senator be allowed to block you on twitter, Roberto?
Great question. I'd say a person's local government officials have far more influence on a person's life than the president would..
Surely robbie and other leftists will be consistent and say ''no, they shouldn't be allowed to either.'' Let's wait & see lol.
Originally posted by Surtur
Why should this just be a rule for the president?Should your state senator be allowed to block you on twitter, Roberto?
Oh and, can twitter legally ban Trump?
Me personally, I think this rule should also apply to congress as well.
See above.
Already answered and explained on previous page, you ignored the facts.
Originally posted by Robtard
This is not correct, as noted,
Your statement about it being incorrect is incorrect, as I noted. lol
Originally posted by Robtard
Trump will probably be president for only two more years and I have no problem with this same rule applying to whomever comes after. Becoming President comes with some personal sacrifices, if a person can't handle that, they shouldn't run for the office.
Yeah, if the next president creates a Twitter account that is named "PresidentTrumpOfficial", yeah, that could be seen as the official presidential twitter account. But Trump is using his private Twitter handle that he had for years before becoming President. 👆 We all know this. NO reason to rehash the facts.
Guess what? Still no official business being conducted on it. 🙂
Unless you view the Office of the President of the United States as a business?
Originally posted by Robtard
Probably this: Presidential Records Actthe PRA changed the legal ownership of the official records of the President from private to public, and established a new statutory structure under which Presidents must manage their records. -snip
edit: Link should work now
I keep reading and reading and I just don't find anything in the rulings about the PRA applying to blocking people on Twitter which is what Adam_Poe posted...
It's as if...as if what I said was correct this whole time. 🙂
Originally posted by dadudemon
Your statement about it being incorrect is incorrect, as I noted. lolYeah, if the next president creates a Twitter account that is named "PresidentTrumpOfficial", yeah, that could be seen as the official presidential twitter account. But Trump is using his private Twitter handle that he had for years before becoming President. 👆 We all know this. NO reason to rehash the facts.
Guess what? Still no official business being conducted on it. 🙂
Unless you view the Office of the President of the United States as a business?
Well no.
Well you're wrong there: First Trump administration tweets come from @realDonaldTrump
Trump has used both the POTUS Twitter and his personal Twitter to conduct POTUS business.
Originally posted by Robtard
Well no.Well you're wrong there: First Trump administration tweets come from @realDonaldTrump
Trump has used both the POTUS Twitter and his personal Twitter to conduct POTUS business.
So you admit that Trump has a presidential Twitter and these rulings should only apply to the official presidential Twitter, not his private one?
It seems like you're conceding the entire argument just now. Why else would you bring up that he has two twitter accounts?
🙂
You could call me out on the fact that I incorrectly stated the Supreme Court Justices ruled on this when they didn't. No one called me out...I got away with it.
Originally posted by dadudemon
So you admit that Trump has a presidential Twitter and these rulings should only apply to the official presidential Twitter, not his private one?It seems like you're conceding the entire argument just now. Why else would you bring up that he has two twitter accounts?
🙂
You could call me out on the fact that I incorrectly stated the Supreme Court Justices ruled on this when they didn't. No one called me out...I got away with it.
Already covered here:
Originally posted by Robtard
Disagreed, when Trump became POTUS his personal Twitter became of the state since he uses it as a Presidential platform to reach the people.Trump's not just tweeting about what he had for lunch or his favorite movies, he's using it for official business.
This supports the above here:
Originally posted by Robtard
Well no.Well you're wrong there: First Trump administration tweets come from @realDonaldTrump
Trump has used both the POTUS Twitter and his personal Twitter to conduct POTUS business.
Originally posted by Robtard
Already covered here:This supports the above here:
So you have no good arguments and nothing new to add? Because all your arguments were addressed and destroyed. You need to present something new if you wish to convince me that something something something stupid.
Let's recap:
1. Not his official presidential twitter account.
2. He has a second one branded for the president stuff.
3. PRA was unrelated to the ruling (which is why it doesn't shows up in the ruling documents)
4. You acknowledge all the facts including the contradiction in the ruling and in your position.
You just like it that Trump lost an argument. That's really all this is. 🙂
Originally posted by dadudemon
So you have no good arguments and nothing new to add? Because all your arguments were addressed and destroyed. You need to present something new if you wish to convince me that something something something stupid.Let's recap:
1. Not his official presidential twitter account.
2. He has a second one branded for the president stuff.
3. PRA was unrelated to the ruling (which is why it doesn't shows up in the ruling documents)
4. You acknowledge all the facts including the contradiction in the ruling and in your position.You just like it that Trump lost an argument. That's really all this is. 🙂
Incorrect and already covered in the post I just quoted for you again above with the corresponding story/links as support.
-Trump has used both the POTUS Twitter and his personal Twitter to conduct POTUS business.
Originally posted by Surtur
Quote me where on the previous page the question is answered.Oh, do you think twitter itself has 1st amendment rights?
Already dissected on page 2 and 3, not playing your silly games where you ignore reality and pretend something didn't happen just because the page flipped.
So here you go:
Originally posted by dadudemon
So you have no good arguments and nothing new to add? Because all your arguments were addressed and destroyed. You need to present something new if you wish to convince me that something something something stupid.Let's recap:
1. Not his official presidential twitter account.
2. He has a second one branded for the president stuff.
3. PRA was unrelated to the ruling (which is why it doesn't shows up in the ruling documents)
4. You acknowledge all the facts including the contradiction in the ruling and in your position.You just like it that Trump lost an argument. That's really all this is. 🙂