Is it time for a digital "bill of rights"?

With YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, you-name-it, etc banning/censoring conservative talking-heads left and right, is it time for legislation that would prohibit these moves?

What exactly is "hate-speech"? Anything that can be interpreted as being hostile towards another group of people? Give me a break.

Leftists Hate Rights... ALL Of them..

That and KMC is Techincally a Dick-In-Tater-SHIP.

KMC hates the Rights Very Much!

No, it just takes a sane stance on those to hide behind "muh free speech" to be horrible people Fly.

You want to say something boring, or irrelevant, or malicious? Claim someone is trying to ban you from saying it. It's how these vacuous Youtube followers are manipulated.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
No, it just takes a sane stance on those to hide behind "muh free speech" to be horrible people Fly.

You want to say something boring, or irrelevant, or malicious? Claim someone is trying to ban you from saying it. It's how these vacuous Youtube followers are manipulated.

The problem is your definition of a "sane" stance.

So the far-lefts stance is that people shouldn't have their rights protected?

Originally posted by Silent Master
So the far-lefts stance is that people shouldn't have their rights protected?

Originally posted by Silent Master
So the far-lefts stance is that people shouldn't have their rights protected?

Mmmyeah , pretty much. Just look at how Google/Youtube hides behind their shenanigans like wiith the Crowder stuff. They tell him He hasn't Broke Any Rules... but they punihsed him cause they don't like how he thinks....

Leftism is Fascism.

The Same kind of thing happens here on the microcosm that is KMC all the time.

And now FacsistBook is going to start pulling THIS SHIT!

FaceBook to soon start Banning People (aka Conservatives) for "HATE SILENCE!

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Mmmyeah , pretty much. Just look at how Google/Youtube hides behind their shenanigans like wiith the Crowder stuff. They tell him He hasn't Broke Any Rules... but they punihsed him cause they don't like how he thinks....

Leftism is Fascism.

The Same kind of thing happens here on the microcosm that is KMC all the time.

And now FacsistBook is going to start pulling THIS SHIT!

FaceBook to soon start Banning People (aka Conservatives) for "HATE SILENCE! [/B]

Originally posted by Flyattractor

Just pointing out how our Loveable Loony Lefties actually Think!

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Just pointing out how our Loveable Loony Lefties actually Think! [/B]

Originally posted by TempAccount
With YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, you-name-it, etc banning/censoring conservative talking-heads left and right, is it time for legislation that would prohibit these moves?

Nope.

Originally posted by TempAccount
With YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, you-name-it, etc banning/censoring conservative talking-heads left and right, is it time for legislation that would prohibit these moves?

What exactly is "hate-speech"? Anything that can be interpreted as being hostile towards another group of people? Give me a break.

I'd rather see a bill of rights which involves government not interfering in a private website's right to manage it's own content. not that it's needed

I would like to see some legislation that holds them accountable to defining and being clear about what their own rules are.

Yeah. That would be nice.

Originally posted by ares834
Nope.

Just to be clear, you're perfectly fine with a few corporations controlling what is rapidly becoming the new public square? With them being able to behave like a publisher, claim first amendment rights, while also enjoying the immunity granted to them due to their "platform" status?

It’s not a public square though it’s private. Yes yes, the ruling about Trump whatever. I’ve already claimed I disagree with it and believe the ruling was wrong.

Originally posted by ares834
It’s not a public square though it’s private. Yes yes, the ruling about Trump whatever. I’ve already claimed I disagree with it and believe the ruling was wrong.

They're rapidly becoming that whether we like it or not. And you can disagree with the ruling, but the precedent has now been set. Regulation is needed.

They did this to themselves. And all over Trump Derangement Syndrome.