Re: Re: Is it time for a digital "bill of rights"?
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
I'd rather see a bill of rights which involves government not interfering in a private website's right to manage it's own content. not that it's needed
Originally posted by Surtur
Why do you have such disdain for youtubers?
Probably because so many people on the right use it to get their voice heard. He wants the left to control everything including the narrative and the way people think. That's how authoritarians roll ya know...and an authoritarian pooty/bashy is.
They (the left) don't want any dissenting opinions to be made well-known because it might start attracting more people to their way of thinking. They want everyone thinking alike that "Orange man bad!! Orange man bad!!"
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Probably because so many people on the right use it to get their voice heard. He wants the left to control everything including the narrative and the way people think. That's how authoritarians roll ya know...and an authoritarian pooty/bashy is.They (the left) don't want any dissenting opinions to be made well-known because it might start attracting more people to their way of thinking. They want everyone thinking alike that "Orange man bad!! Orange man bad!!"
IMO his biggest issue with it is that you're able to see criticism of the left that comes from sources other than the right.
It's why they do not like liberals such as Tim Pool, Dave Rubin, and Sargon.
KMC's Trumper Squad wanting the government to interfere with private platforms, too funny.
If you think Youtube, Twitter or whatever is shit and are "fascist" as you like to label anyone who holds a different viewpoint, go to anther platform. You know, the whole "free market will sort it out" approach you people often use to defend a person's right to bigotry.
Originally posted by Robtard
KMC's Trumper Squad wanting the government to interfere with private platforms, too funny.If you think Youtube, twitter or whatever is shit and are "fascist" as you like to label, go to anther platform. You know, the whole "free market will sort it out" approach you people often use to defend a person's right to bigotry.
What exactly are Trumpers wanting the government to do?
Originally posted by Robtard
KMC's Trumper Squad wanting the government to interfere with private platforms, too funny.If you think Youtube, Twitter or whatever is shit and are "fascist" as you like to label anyone who holds a different viewpoint, go to anther platform. You know, the whole "free market will sort it out" approach you people often use to defend a person's right to bigotry.
Translation:
Originally posted by RobtardBingo! 👆
KMC's Trumper Squad wanting the government to interfere with private platforms, too funny.If you think Youtube, Twitter or whatever is shit and are "fascist" as you like to label anyone who holds a different viewpoint, go to anther platform. You know, the whole "free market will sort it out" approach you people often use to defend a person's right to bigotry.
Originally posted by Robtard
KMC's Trumper Squad wanting the government to interfere with private platforms, too funny.If you think Youtube, Twitter or whatever is shit and are "fascist" as you like to label anyone who holds a different viewpoint, go to anther platform. You know, the whole "free market will sort it out" approach you people often use to defend a person's right to bigotry.
👆
Agreed
Enough regulation and forcing companies to act and do what you want.
Bitchute was created as an alternative to YouTube because of YouTube's unfair practices. It looks like it is taking off. I'll try to use it more often to show my support. Is there a viable alternative to Twitter?
Originally posted by dadudemon
👆Agreed
Enough regulation and forcing companies to act and do what you want.
Bitchute was created as an alternative to YouTube because of YouTube's unfair practices. It looks like it is taking off. I'll try to use it more often to show my support. Is there a viable alternative to Twitter?
We've been over this before: you know the troubles Gab has faced. People will not simply let you go quietly form your own platform.
And just like when people didn't like Patreon and went to StarSubscribe...SJW's attacked that as well and they had to suspend payments.
Minds is another alternative, guess what? An upcoming event they are holding is having to switch venues because one venue cancelled because Antifa threatened to burn it to the ground. And this is after they hacked into the theaters twitter account and said they wouldn't release it until they dropped the group from the event.
So yeah I'd thumb Robs comment up a thousand f*cking times if it was based in reality and if shitheads who cry over youtube hosting offensive shit wouldn't run over to the very next platform these people try to use and cry there too.
It's not that these people don't want these views on youtube and twitter, they don't seem to want them anywhere. So f*ck that, I say fight youtube so they stop bending the knee to SJWs. F*ck 'em. They've earned so much off these creators and those creators do not deserve to have a big steaming dump taken on their livelihoods cuz some fruitcakes got offended. *They* should leave youtube if it's offensive instead of whining to them about hurt feelings and offensive videos. I, Surtur, turn off a tv show if I don't like it I do not try to get it cancelled.
Exhibit A of people who went to alternative platform being left alone to their own devices:
Why is Antifa Attacking the #Minds IRL Event?
Originally posted by Surtur
We've been over this before: you know the troubles Gab has faced. People will not simply let you go quietly form your own platform.And just like when people didn't like Patreon and went to StarSubscribe...SJW's attacked that as well and they had to suspend payments.
Minds is another alternative, guess what? An upcoming event they are holding is having to switch venues because one venue cancelled because Antifa threatened to burn it to the ground. And this is after they hacked into the theaters twitter account and said they wouldn't release it until they dropped the group from the event.
So yeah I'd thumb Robs comment up a thousand f*cking times if it was based in reality and if shitheads who cry over youtube hosting offensive shit wouldn't run over to the very next platform these people try to use and cry there too.
It's not that these people don't want these views on youtube and twitter, they don't seem to want them anywhere. So f*ck that, I say fight youtube so they stop bending the knee to SJWs. F*ck 'em. They've earned so much off these creators and those creators do not deserve to have a big steaming dump taken on their livelihoods cuz some fruitcakes got offended. *They* should leave youtube if it's offensive instead of whining to them about hurt feelings and offensive videos. I, Surtur, turn off a tv show if I don't like it I do not try to get it cancelled.
Agreed 100%.
And many people still don't understand the differences betweeen a publisher and a public forum/square. This 6-minute video does an excellent job of explaining them:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6C6_NVj964
Basically, it points out that a platform can't be both at the same time. A platform, like You Tube for instance, can't simultaneously act like a publisher by controlling everything that gets said on its channel and also claim to be an open forum and/or public square type of channel in which anyone can post whatever they want on it and which also makes YT immune from being sued for anything people post on the channel.
That is the basis for Prager U's lawsuit against You Tube which is what the video in link above is about.
You Tube is trying to have their cake and eat it too.
Honestly I'm starting to feel somewhat optimistic. Facebook has at least admitted to the bias on their platform and taken a first step towards trying to fix it, youtube has in the past few weeks actually acknowledge pewdiepie's existence and been doing more to deal with bullshit copystrike claims.
I'm not getting complacent and assuming everything will go great from here, but I'm tentatively a bit optimistic.
Originally posted by Surtur
We've been over this before: you know the troubles Gab has faced. People will not simply let you go quietly form your own platform.And just like when people didn't like Patreon and went to StarSubscribe...SJW's attacked that as well and they had to suspend payments.
Minds is another alternative, guess what? An upcoming event they are holding is having to switch venues because one venue cancelled because Antifa threatened to burn it to the ground. And this is after they hacked into the theaters twitter account and said they wouldn't release it until they dropped the group from the event.
So yeah I'd thumb Robs comment up a thousand f*cking times if it was based in reality and if shitheads who cry over youtube hosting offensive shit wouldn't run over to the very next platform these people try to use and cry there too.
It's not that these people don't want these views on youtube and twitter, they don't seem to want them anywhere. So f*ck that, I say fight youtube so they stop bending the knee to SJWs. F*ck 'em. They've earned so much off these creators and those creators do not deserve to have a big steaming dump taken on their livelihoods cuz some fruitcakes got offended. *They* should leave youtube if it's offensive instead of whining to them about hurt feelings and offensive videos. I, Surtur, turn off a tv show if I don't like it I do not try to get it cancelled.
Have you seen bitchute? It's very similar to YouTube. It is an alternative and it is working. It is successful already. Case closed.
As for Twitter-alts - nothing you mentioned matters. Literally doesn't matter for this topic. If a business' success is dependent upon holding a rally, that's a shitty business unless the business is a rally-making business or something.
When in the history of any online technology has holding a rally been paramount to a technology's success?